PTSD ignored

Plight of traumatised soldiers 'ignored by Government'
By Terri Judd
Published: 13 January 2007

Those charged with caring for military personnel returning from tours of duty have warned of a dramatic increase in servicemen and women needing help because of the traumatic nature of their experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The issue was highlighted when Tony Blair had to face a former lance-corporal in the Coldstream Guards who felt that he had been "abandoned" after coming home with post-traumatic stress disorder from his second tour of Iraq.

Justin Smith, 32, told the Prime Minister during a debate on ITV's Westcountry Live programme: "I have lost my house, my security and any self-belief," adding: "Now I'm living in temporary accommodation that is forcing me to go to work rather than concentrate on getting better, and I want to know what the Government is going to do." Mr Blair promised to look into the situation, insisting that there was supposed to be adequate provision for those who are medically discharged.

But last night another veteran, John Pentreath, of the Royal British Legion, accused the Government of "shutting the door" on those needing help after serving their country. He said: "I don't expect the Government to carry out their duty of care to people like Justin. They will just say that, once he's a civilian, there is the NHS."

But the leading charity in the area, Combat Stress, and the new British Armed Forces Federation say it is inappropriate to treat men and women with battle stress among civilians, and that military hospitals are needed.

Robert Marsh, of Combat Stress, said they already have 8,000 veterans on their books and will soon struggle to cope with mounting numbers. Last year, they had a 26 per cent increase and many do not present themselves for at least a decade.

"We are really busy. We have seen over 120 veterans of Iraq but we consider that is just the bow wave of what we are likely to see in the future. And, with fatalities in Afghanistan higher, we can expect the same. We are storing up a bit of shocker," he said.

Treatment of physically and mentally wounded soldiers has become a long-term thorn in the Prime Minister's side as an increasing number of high-profile figures have accused the Government of breaking the covenant with the military and failing in its duty of care.

The issue flared up again yesterday as Mr Blair promised to improve conditions for the armed forces and admitted soldiers deserved better. But he insisted that Britain must maintain its status as a major defence power and warned against any retreat from fighting wars.

Speaking aboard HMS Albion in Plymouth, he said that military might was essential to winning the war on terror as he tried to rally increasingly sceptical troops. But he acknowledged that the covenant with the forces had to be renewed as soldiers were asked to undertake unprecedented challenges.

"For our part, in Government, it will mean increased expenditure on equipment, personnel and the conditions of our Armed Forces - not in the short run, but for the long term," he said, adding: "On the part of the military, they need to accept that in a volunteer armed force, conflict and casualty may be part of what they are called upon to face."

Yet Mr Marsh insisted that treating returning service personnel in NHS hospitals was inadequate as often they found it difficult to discuss the trauma generated by combat with civilians. The last psychiatric military hospital closed in 1999. In 2001 a review found there were not enough military acute in-patient psychiatric cases to justify a unit and the Government found it more cost-effective to offer private care at the Priory, a clinic known for taking on celebrities.

"In an ideal world military people would be treated in military hospitals and veterans should be treated in veterans' institutions. We are the only Western nation that does not do that. If you look at the Americans, they almost get treatment from cradle to grave," said Mr Marsh.

Douglas Young, chairman of the British Armed Forces Federation, agreed: "In the NHS, with the best will in the world, any sort of group therapy would be with people with completely different problems. If you are already finding it horrendously difficult to try and explain problems that arise from battle, with respect you are not going to get much help from an alcoholic."

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence said that under two per cent of servicemen and women had developed PTSD but the department was aware that it was a condition with delayed symptoms and continued to fund research into the problem.


MoD figures show that 1,897 soldiers have returned from Iraq with mental health problems, of whom 278 have post-traumatic stress disorder. Others suffer depression or acute anxiety, or turn to drink and drugs.
There was an excellent documentry on this on channell 4's Despatches about 6 months ago i think the way our wounded, both physical and mental have been treated is shoddy if not down right criminal!
There is still and always will be a reluctance to treat or fully acknowledge any form of chronic disability caused by service related injuries. Time and again I am sure the old practice of "deny all, they will get tired or die and we won't have to pay out" is dusted off when the issue arises. Then they wonder why experienced service personnel leave in such numbers. Maybe those in Government have ceased to care. If so shame on them. That kind of short term thinking however is endemic to politics and politicians. Particularly when they have announced their intention to retire.
Douglas Young, chairman of the British Armed Forces Federation, agreed: "In the NHS, with the best will in the world, any sort of group therapy would be with people with completely different problems. If you are already finding it horrendously difficult to try and explain problems that arise from battle, with respect you are not going to get much help from an alcoholic."

Not a very politically correct comment, but I felt it made a fair point about the need for specialised support for military-related psychiatrc problems.



War Hero
There are a few people out there (but watch out for the carpet-baggers) that can help.

I know this bloke in Wales called David Bennet. He's got a website at with some very useful links on and some good information.

He's not a degree qualified suited consultant, he's a genuinely nice bloke who listens. Worth a try.
The ''with respect'' clears you on that one Hackle...Anyway, being PC is less important than getting good care for sufferers.
The MoD's own figures of ''under 2%'' still means around 1 in 50 service personel will develop PTSD.
Good to see BAFF doing the stuff....
Psych issues are always under reported by serving personnel because of the flow on effects in their work and personal lives. Even after leaving the forces there is very much a culture of "oh so you are joining the fruitcake brigade now huh?" if individuals seek help. They are often more shunned within their social group for admitting to needing help than by crutching along exhibiting possibly far less pleasant behaviours. Until that changes then there will always be a reluctance to say anything and the MoD/DoD will have the ability to claim active service only effects a small number and there is no need to bring back the forces specific hospitals or programmes due to the financial cost outweighing the benefits.

Latest Threads