Promotion of Seniors with Introduction of VENG

Discussion in 'REME' started by The_IRON, Nov 20, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Not sure if been discussed but reasonably hot off the press.

    After reading through the latest changes to current promotion rules I think that the powers above have done a good job to try and deal with the issues of VENG.
    The main changes Ive seen on non tech trades are that Sgts still have to do 15 years service but have to do 3 years sub rank (rather than 2) for promotion to SSGT.

    Tiffies have to do 4 years in sub rank allowing them to do a minimum of two complete tours. This I totally agree with as it then makes sure that they are fully ready and showed their worth at two different units before getting their badge.

    Also good to see that Artisan WO2 can now get their WO1 after 2 years in the rank.

    On the whole most of the changes mean an additional year in rank before being eligable for promotion (unless your an old bloke like me) I think its a good thing but whats the view of the mass?

    Hope there can be a sensible discussion with peoples views on here and throw it over to okimato for a starter for ten.
     
  2. Nothing new here really, the time in rank has varied over the years in order to try and provide some stability/fairness it was 4 yrs when I came through that juncture. Personally I've always favoured time in the rank over time served. The first means adequate experience, the second that you just stuck around long enough!

    The crux is when are they boarded. If 4 years before a board then in reality they'll end up doing a 2 yr and a 2.5 to 3 yr tour. If it's 4 years before actual promotion then no problem, they can be selected and move on acting promotion somewhere between 3.5 and 4 yrs.
     
  3. Funny how the promotion to WO1 wasn't affected this year isnt it!! Possibly too many compo claims to deal with!!
     
  4.  
  5. Decision made in October by the command group however kept under wraps for a whole month with everyone in denial!! You cant demand respect it needs to be earned!! Has the Corps just ripped its own heart out???
     
  6. Right so no real issue then if it's 4 years to substantive promotion there's nothing to stop the exceptional picking up an acting promotion as soon as the board's sat (or even before if it's their current CO that wants them in the rank). Let's be honest these a few and far between.

    You also seem to be working to two very strange assumptions:

    1. That everybody will gain the appropriate CR recommendations to appear on the board.

    2. That everybody will pass the board.

    Neither of these is true so the effect is not a solid barrier to promotion but a slip to the right for the "average" tiffy, the exceptionals will still get promoted early the not so good a little later sure the very late may miss out altogether and whilst I don't know the individuals you refer to and therefore am not commenting on their cases in anyway, if you're a twenty year tiffy are you suitable for WO rank?

    Perhaps the net effect will be an overall increase in the quality of WO?

    In fact having re-read your post and a couple of others it sounds as though you think of promotion as a contractual condition of going tiffy.
     
  7. In agreeance with oldfart.

    Really think the issue is the timing and manner that the information was leaked! If it had affected the wo2-wo1 board then fair enough!! in that case it would affect ALL ranks from top to bottom!! Which is surely what vacancy promotion is all about!!
     
  8. Thats an interesting thing to say Oldfart. I wasn't aware that there was a problem with the current set of WOs. If there is could you elaborate (Im not baiting - just genuinely interested and able to take criticism).

    Whilst I think that there is a lot of pointless bleating on here, and Im mainly looking at those that will still have the chance to become WO1, it does beg the question as to why the communication of information is so poor within our supposedly technical Corps. I heard about this first on here despite being a Bn ASM and attending the DEME(A) WOs conference. Its a let down for the masses & I wonder if the Officer Corps can look inward and address the fact?

    I do agree with your posts about people believing that by going on the board that they are immediately going to pick up. I took 3 promotion boards to get my WO2 (a combination of a poor report (which the OC later apologised for) and time served) but it allowed me to complete two very different postings. I believe that I was much better prepared for life as a WO after this time and I am now much more employable and aware of the "bigger picture". Some are undoubtedly disadvantaged and I feel for the guys that wont get the chance to be an ASM however the others should turn to the right, pick their chins up (after a beer and a bitch to the wife) and work out how they can turn this to their advantage.
     
  9. Absolutely not! Nothing of the sort intented.

    No intent of starting a ruck either but logically if the line moves to the right the pass performance scores will inevitably rise hence an net increase in quality. Personally I'd prefer to see a horizontal line where the criteria is based solely on performance and not time in rank (subject to an obvious minimum). On purely mathematical analysis the sloping line can only imply that experience compensates for lack of performance. It's not a perfect system but subject to a few tweaks it's served well enough for the past 67 years.

    To the best of my knowledge there are very few WO posts allowed to sit vacant for any length of time hence the opportunity for flyers to pick up an acting promotion.
     
  10. Seems to be the older members of the Corps who are feeling the pinch here.....

    Probably the same Tiffies who never bothered their backside to get a Commander ES interview, but then when the application was just to hand in a form..they suddenly got out the brew room and 'gave it a go'...

    It slowed up us young folk who actually wanted to jump through the origional hoops at the time....Karma

    Not saying thats every one here but if you wern't bothered before it was easy to do, then you deserve the extra year... :D
     
  11. Poncho, isn't the first rule of comparisons within the army to say that 'it was harder in my day' not admit it's easier :D

    My opinion is that the 2 engagements should be run seperately, if on VEng then accept an extra year before boarding for WO2 and then WO1, if not on VEng then you should board. It has to be absorbed somewhere and
    If the 2 years were absorbed at the Cpl and Sgt boards then a lot more soldiers would be affected.

    I don't expect the current LE rules for WO2 to stay at 19yrs either, my money is on that moving 2yrs to the right as well to align with the 24 yr career. If there are plans for that happening the corps should make sure that people don't hear about it on ARRSE instead of through the CofC
     
  12.  
  13. For me I was looking forward to going to the board.
    Now the new rules have prevented that.
    SJAR written.
    Looking at the goals,
    about to take the shot,
    s**t goalposts have moved,
    sorry to inform you,
    you are not going to the board.
    Give me that lottery ticket back, I am going to burn it.

    Just when I thought nothing could supprise me in the corp.

    I am sure I am not the only one out there.

    To quote annex b "the increase will not be felt", trust me I felt it.
    I now await all the "get your chin up remarks"
     
  14.  
  15.