Priti Vacant?

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by MrShanklysboots, Nov 8, 2017.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Harvey Weinstein walt
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Nah, Generals Matthis and Dunford are running the show across the pond in what I've heard described as a soft coup.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. It would be money better spent if you were gagged with a ball gag and had your fingers restrained to prevent you from communicating utter testicular nonsense.
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. Goatman

    Goatman LE Book Reviewer

    @Boumer ...I can see my grasp of foreign affairs has been severely limited by 30 plus years not working at the FCO.

    Are you pro Tel Aviv because you fear that to be anti-Israel means being branded as a fascist fellow traveller?

    - or because you have considered the relative merits of the case and concluded that Balfour was ...hey, dead on ?

    I missed out on 'Yes Minister' originally...just a Satsuma*, down there in the weeds. I was just trying to get a job done. Not my gift to say

    ' I disapprove of this regime and will therefore not comply'

    - although I did come across one guy who said as much in relation to sending spares to Chile. it didn't stop the transaction. Hey ho, moving on.

    Consider this....

    CAAT - Resources - Country Information - Saudi Arabia - The Arabian Connection: The UK Arms Trade to Saudi Arabia

    Then do a bit of digging and see how much this country has sold to Israel since 1967 ? and set it against this:

    Israel–United States military relations - Wikipedia

    U.S. policy changed markedly after the Six-Day War of 1967, in response to a perception that many Arab states (notably Egypt) had permanently drifted toward the Soviet Union. In 1968, with strong support from Congress, U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson approved the sale of F-4 Phantom II fighters to Israel, establishing the precedent for U.S. support for Israel's qualitative military edge over its neighbors. The U.S., however, would continue to supply arms to Israel's neighbors, particularly Lebanon, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, in order to counter Soviet arms sales and influence in the region.[citation needed]

    During the Yom Kippur War in 1973, the U.S. mounted a major airlift codenamed Operation Nickel Grass to deliver weapons and supplies to Israel. Over 22,000 tons of tanks, artillery, ammunition, and other materiel were delivered to aid the Israeli military in response to a large-scale Soviet resupply effort of the Arab states. The operation was paralleled by a large-scale sealift of some 33,000 tons of materiel and the transfer of 40 F-4 Phantoms, 36 A-4 Skyhawks and twelve C-130 Hercules transport aircraft to replace Israeli war losses.[11]

    Bilateral military cooperation deepened under the Ronald Reagan administration in the 1980s. In 1981, U.S. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger and Israeli Minister of Defense Ariel Sharon signed the Strategic Cooperation Agreement, establishing a framework for continued consultation and cooperation to enhance the national security of both countries. In November 1983, the two sides formed a Joint Political Military Group, which still meets twice a year, to implement most provisions of the MOU.[12] Joint air and sea military exercises began in June 1984, and the United States has constructed facilities to stockpile military equipment in Israe

    Then add in this: Britain is now the second biggest arms dealer in the world

    Then consider the phrase ' A moral arms trade' - or << Blair's Fig Leaf >>

    A great many jobs, particularly North of the line Avon - The Wash still rely on such transactions.

    Personally, I've never bought the line ' Well - if we don't the French/Russians/Chinese/Yanks will '

    But it might help explain the apparently 'traditionally Arabist' pov of the Foreign Office ?

    pip pip, what?

    * you know? ....Like a Mandarin?...but with less pips?
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Still would though.
  6. She lies without much in the way of guilt showing so could go all the way. Her selection shows how much the quality in the pool has dropped.
  7. It blows feck all out of the water. If her visit(s) was/were official she wouldn't have resigned. HTH.
  8. Mordant's an apparatchik of a particular wing. Expect nothing.
  9. Wordsmith

    Wordsmith LE Book Reviewer

    Nope - I saying that a lot (not all) of the current crop of MP's lack experience of the world outside of politics. We're get a better crop of MP's if more had achieved something of note .

    Priti Patel - Wikipedia
    So, straight of of uni into a researcher's job for the Tories, then 10 years in PR firms flogging the merits of alcohol and tobacco. Proves she can talk a lot, but her practical record of achievement in the real world where profits get made is minimal.

    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  10. She is however pro Brexit !
  11. In that case, I agree, and have often thought that a minimum age of 40 should be a prerequisite for standing for parliament.

    This would hopefully ensure some work experience, unless of course it simply means that future MPs spend longer as advisors or other political bubble related jobs
  12. wot I said wivout saying it. She appears to be a good constituency MP but her Turkish fibs weren't the words of anyone who should be holding a ministerial brief. She either needs to wise up quickly and realise that what she says will be remembered or STFU, otherwise she'll be following Ms Vacant pdq.
  13. Flight

    Flight LE Book Reviewer

    Foreign affairs select committee will be investigating all this next week. Could be interesting..

    No Foreign Office takeover of international aid budget, says Priti Patel

    So Patel was fighting back against a Boris power grab..

    Priti Patel accused of overshadowing Middle East minister's mission

    "It is understood that Patel’s earlier visit to Netanyahu was mentioned at Burt’s meeting in Jerusalem, meaning that Foreign Office officials should then have been advised of her trip. The Foreign Office dispute that Patel’s meeting with Netanyahu was mentioned at this meeting."

    They can dispute all they like though as a report on the successful meeting was given to the deputy ambassador their story is bollocks.

    Course Burt, the foreign office's Middle East minister, is also Priti Patel's junior minister for International Development. Arranging details for Bibi's Balfour dinner is quite clearly Burt's terrain, hence the idea he knew nothing about this meeting.... Lol

    Also the FCO had three months to raise concerns with the Cabinet office if they felt that Patel's visit broke protocol, and did not supposedly.

    After Patel fights back against Boris' power grab the BBC gets the lead at the perfect time to embarrass Netanyahu who was in London for the Balfour centenary.

    Seems her enemies are resorting to lookalike porn..

    • Informative Informative x 1