Police H&K sent to Grandma in post

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by Blogg, Dec 10, 2008.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Why...?

    ..not a weapon

    Nobody hurt

    no story here..

    move on please...
  2. Assistant Chief Constable Adrian Whiting, of Dorset Police, said: 'Because this item isn't actually a firearm it is lawful for the company, the suppliers, to use a courier as they did.

    'I hasten to add if it was a real firearm we would transport it by hand, making sure that no such error like this could occur.

    'The item is perfectly safe and can't cause anyone any harm but it does look like one of our firearms.'

    'Yes, if somebody wanted to misuse it and pretend it was real as you could perhaps a a toy firearm then it could be quite a distressing item.'

    Hmmmm.... especially if you are in Guildford, apparently....
  3. But honestly, how many people would get it through the post and upon looking in the case think "mmmm, thats little Tommys Xmas present sorted!" :twisted:
  4. Time to re-launch The Johnny Seven!
  5. Ohhh I've always wanted my own SAT/DCCT range!
  6. heh, I've just noticed the "...mistakenly sent a police Heckler & Koch machine gun similar to this one..." picture caption, the similarity ended with it being black and made by H&K as the simulator was a G36C and the file picture that of an MP5, journo muppets.
  7. Indeed, I don't understand why they needed the MP5 pic and caption as the picture heading the article addresses all the visual info you need.

    I found it interesting that a rep from the police claims that the thing isn't a firearm. I know the hobby gets flak on here but I'm an airsofter and thanks to some harping from the lunatics that run the country my toy guns (because lets face it, thats what they are) have now been given the rather serious sounding name of 'Replica Imitation Firearm', toy guns (any sort, bb, rubber sucker, water etc) with more than 50% of them being painted an unrealistic colour are classed as 'Imitation Firearms'.

    The proper airsoft stuff tends to fall more in the realms of low powered air weapons by function but it seems the legislation is written based on appearance. As far as I'm aware the classification on air weapons keeps them classed as weapons dealt with under the Firearms Act due to their muzzle energies and deacts, models and training tools such as the one discussed are classed as just 'replica firearms'.

    So, the object in question I believe is subject to legislation written in both the Firearms Act and Violent Crime Reduction Act, the latter of which clearly states that the item in question is a RIF. Somewhat amusing that someone responsible for enforcing the law goes and makes a statement that is technically wrong and could have been easily replaced with "The item in question although realistic in appearance is comparable in function to the same blasters used in laser quest and poses no risk to public safety".

    Still, given the amount of red tape the police are wrapped up in its not surprising they don't know the latest crazy definitions for big boys toys and things that are actually dangerous in the wrong hands.
  8. the_boy_syrup

    the_boy_syrup LE Book Reviewer

    Until you point it at someone :wink:
  9. BrunoNoMedals

    BrunoNoMedals LE Reviewer

    So you're an expert then, love?

    Get a grip.
  10. She could have blinded someone! If she had a DCCT handy to plug it into :D