Payback Iranian style

#2
NEO_CON said:
If the British accuse the Iranians than the Iranians are going to accuse the British.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/HAF834256.htm
What's your point? (And I'm starting to think about this particular question on several different levels.)

Have you stopped to think about how Fox News and their hacks are received overseas? Pat Robertson used his CBN to call for the assassination of Hugo Chavez ffs! It doesn't mean that the government is going to do it.
 
B

Biscuits_AB

Guest
#3
I wouldn't put it past the Iranians to have done it themselves in order to divert attentions away from their 'role' in Iraq and who better to accuse, but us.
 
#4
Biscuits_AB said:
I wouldn't put it past the Iranians to have done it themselves in order to divert attentions away from their 'role' in Iraq and who better to accuse, but us.
The thought had crossed my mind too. In response to your question- The Great Satan?
 
#5
What's your point? (And I'm starting to think about this particular question on several different levels.)

I thought at first this was a case of simple payback for British accusations about the Iranians



Now I think they are testing to see how far they can push, diplomatically and checking to see what the British response will be



The Foreign Office was yesterday investigating whether the Iranian government has slapped a trade embargo on Britain as punishment for the UK's stance over Iran's nuclear programme.

Diplomats in Tehran said the informal move - which has not been officially announced - appeared to be in retaliation for Britain's uncompromising stance and reflected a worsening in relations between the countries.

A Foreign Office spokesman said: "We are aware of indications that action has been taken against British companies but it has happened before at various times of tension, and I believe we can cope."

It follows a period of heightened tension between the two countries and follows Iranian accusations that Britain was behind a series of bombings in the south of the country at the weekend.
Tony Blair and other government figures have accused Iran of providing sophisticated weapons to insurgent groups that have been used to kill British troops in southern Iraq this year.

The anti-British trade ban has been accompanied by other ad hoc embargoes against South Korea, the Czech Republic and Argentina. All three countries voted for a British-led resolution at last month's meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which agreed to refer Iran to the UN security council unless it suspended current nuclear activities.

Britain sells about $1bn (£560m) a year in goods, mainly for the oil industry, to Iran. Iranian sales to Britain are relatively small by comparison.

Iran took similar action a few years ago, according to a British official. He said it is normal for the Iranian government not to formally announce such a ban but simply to delay visas, credit deals, customs papers and take other such actions that bring trade to a standstill.

The move against Britain came after calls from Iran's hardline media for a severing of links between the two countries. Gholamhossein Elham, chief of staff to the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, confirmed yesterday that worsening political ties would affect trade relations. "Political relations and views definitely have an impact on economic relations," the ISNA student news agency quoted him as saying. "Iran's political, economic and cultural relations with other countries are connected to one another and these relations have an impact on each other."

The latest embargo follows a period of anti-British rhetoric from Iran. Last month demonstrators hurled petrol bombs and eggs at the British embassy compound in Tehran in anger over the IAEA resolution.

There were further signs of deteriorating ties yesterday when the head of the judiciary in the southern province of Khuzestan claimed a plot by "British spies" to blow up Iran's largest oil refinery had been foiled.

Sayed Khalil Akbar al-Sadat told the hardline Jomhuri Islami newspaper that the refinery in Abadan had been targeted by agents "using five Katyusha rockets with a timer on them". The report followed claims by law enforcement officials that they had defused a bomb beneath a bridge in Ahvaz, Khuzestan's capital. Ahvaz was the scene of two bombings last Saturday which killed six people.A Foreign Office spokesman described as "complete rubbish" Iranian claims that British soldiers were supporting Khalq guerrillas carrying out actions in southern Iran.




American relations with the Iranians are already tense. The EU is thinking about placing sanctions over nuclear weapons development programs .Why the British accusations at the current time?(The British have probably known about Iranian involvement in bomb making help for a long time) The Iranians actions and accusations are to determine British intent.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top