Pathfinders - Betrayed behind enemy lines.

Discussion in 'The Book Club' started by loopintheP, May 6, 2012.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Classic case of "who dares earns"
    • Like Like x 1
  2. The author gets his reply in early....... I know I am going to get some snipes from people who think I should have kept quiet. It has been a lonely journey but morally it was the right thing to do. The key reason was to learn lessons from the mistakes," he said.
  3. What mistakes were actually made?
  4. Entirely believable and similar IMO, to B20....compromised, asked for help/extraction, only to be ignored as the head sheds, miles away decided that the they knew better than the men on the ground and that the call 'was a bit premature' they didn't want to look stupid in the eyes of the yanks as we didn't have the means to extract anyway, so would have meant asking them for help.

    Even in our Modern army we still often have to contend with the egos and lack of ethics of some the so called 'Leaders of Men', who attitudes wouldn't look out of place from that of Victorian times.

    Then they wonder why previously loyal soldiers end up slightly bitter about the whole experience and decided to write about it.
    • Like Like x 18
  5. ...must have been incredible to have served at the heart of MoD during this time
  6. Written by some one who knows nothing about b20.
    They didn't take vehicles against all senior advice. The radios they had failed to work, so we're unable to ask for help. They took a different emergency route then what they said so when help came they were no where near.
    All this lays on patrol commanders shoulders no one else's.
    • Like Like x 3
  7. ..It was, and always got home in time for the Simpson's...winner.
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Hmm? Ok, I won't go into what I do know about it......a pissing war is boring in soooo many ways but I keep my veiws and opinions based on what I do know, and you keep yours. Sound fair?
    • Like Like x 2
  9. Well, in this they all got back OK, so clearly the call was a bit premature

    Recce group sent out to locate and evaluate the enemy, and does so, nothing more, nothing less - if the intel they already had could have been relied on, there would have been no need for a f'king recce group, would there!
    • Like Like x 1
  10. ......was talking about B20 and the premature call mucka.....Post No. 93 of this.

    There was something in the press at the time about the OP.
  11. ugly

    ugly LE Moderator

    Its nothing new, the jumped up **** of a captain in the ops room always knows better than the bloke on the ground. seen it so many times its laughable.
    • Like Like x 10

  12. Recce group sent to evaluate an airfield a couple of hundred k's behind the front line. If that doesn't call for on-call support or extraction plans, then why bother at all!?
    • Like Like x 5
  13. ugly

    ugly LE Moderator

    Makes you wonder why if no extraction plan was in place did they do the op? Surely basic recce principles as COCK and COCOA still apply?
    • Like Like x 3
  14. Recce group sent to evaluate an airfield a couple of hundred k's behind the front line.

    Sounds like a typical case of "we are bullet proof", until someone actually starts shooting. Good efforts on promoting your book though.
    • Like Like x 2