Panorama and bankruptcy

Discussion in 'Finance, Property, Law' started by ugly, Jan 8, 2018.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. ugly

    ugly LE Moderator

    On the BBC at time of typing, I was laughing at the figures involved especially where they were unpaid tax bills of £10 million. Now if you are a creditor then it sucks and can put you under but surely the exchequer can be a bit sharper than this.
    Lets assume that in future all corporations with a turnover of 1/2 a million are required to have appointed a company accountant qualified and possibly licensed to operate. These company accountants could be liable in law for imprisonment if they fail to comply with corporate law regarding tax returns and companies house returns.
    Perhaps this would reinforce the bankruptcy courts but would also create a level of integrity as yet unseen.
    Would this have value in proposing to my local MP?
     
    • Excellent Topic Excellent Topic x 11
    • Like Like x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. One of my pet hates are unpaid debts so I like your thinking, although I do believe that you are a bit of a liberal. Personally I`d bring back the poor houses, if a company owes money then the director/s go into the poor house until its paid. And the same goes for individuals who declare themselves bankrupt because they`ve spent all their income on sky/mobiles/piss instead of living within their means.
    Would it have value in proposing to your MP, who knows ? Having contacted mine several times I`m under the impression that their influence is more local than national, and they are no more than glorified messenger boys/girls in a lot of cases.
     
    • Like Like x 5
  3. Individuals who effectively hide behind the 'Ltd. Company' shield are a pain in the arrse for many small businesses and sole traders.

    The BiL who was a big time partner with one of the large accounting firms. He told me that if you run a Ltd. Co. and are likely to go tits up be accident or design (which happens more than you would think) you should always keep enough in the kitty to pay for the insolvency admin. That way they will do it nicely and not drop you in it.
     
    • Informative Informative x 5
    • Like Like x 2
  4. How dare you suggest that people (all genders) should be responsible for their lifestyle choices it is the duty of government to rescue idiots from their stupid descisions in life, from cradle to grave. Poor unsuspecting citizens that choose drugs, alcohol, body piercing, gender change, poor money management or anything that lures in the hard of thinking should be rescued by the state as its a human right to completely screw up with no reprocusions, how very dare you.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Funny Funny x 2
  5. I used to think like that, but then I matured a bit, and realized that there are plenty of circumstances where the individuals that you would have in the poor house have done nothing wrong.

    Let's say you're a subcontractor to Carillion. They're about to go tits up. They will be months out paying invoices right now. Do you pay your payroll or your trade invoices with what cash you have? If you go with the invoices, your blokes go unpaid. Do they then also go to the poor house?

    About 5 years ago, Canada's currency fell through the floor. 30% loss of value. If you're a Canadian company buying goods and services from foreign suppliers, your bills just went up 30%. The obvious statement is "well buy Canadian then". But if you're buying something that just isn't made in Canada, e.g telecom technology, then you can't.

    Now granted people do take the piss, and by all means crucify them, but it's often circumstance more than intent.
     
    • Like Like x 15
  6. Having been through this at work 6 months ago I am much of the view that directors should be held criminally responsible for their actions
    Months of pain for everyone at management level. Shop floor blissfully unaware despite it being obvious what was going on.

    We were bought out an hour after going under for a fraction of the true value but it was a distressed sale and a couple of hundred jobs were saved. The people who bought us out put their own money in to the company and its now a very different story but they could only do that because the bank sold the company off for pennies.

    Many of our suppliers took a bath in a big way, some in the tens of thousands, a few in the hundreds of thousands
    Most still do business with the new company and chatting to one supplier yesterday he was actually grateful that we had done our best to help him out in the aftermath. Other suppliers hold you personally responsible.

    We were previously owned by private equity and personally I think their ethics and management wouldn't stand a great deal of scrutiny.
    Nobody has been held accountable for the failure of a company with a turnover in the tens of millions.
     
    • Informative Informative x 4
    • Like Like x 3
  7. Nothing to do with maturity but all to do with responsibility. 30 days credit should mean 30 days, not 60 or 90 or 120. There should be procedures in place where a company will suffer if their debts aren`t paid within the time period required. Your blokes wouldn`t have to go to the poor house because like all responsible people they would keep some funds in reserve for a rainy day.
     
    • Show again braincell Show again braincell x 3
  8. Congratulations, you've just won the Arrse "Buffoonish statement of the day" prize, against some stiff opposition.

    Fortunately from the content of your post, I surmise that you'll never be in a position of power or responsibility, and so I won't have to lay awake at night worrying about what a cluster you're going to make of things.

    Toodles.
     
    • Like Like x 5
    • Show again braincell Show again braincell x 1
  9. Dont give them credit is the answer alternatively get PG`s off the directors .
     
  10. Never owned and run a medium sized business have you?
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Show again braincell Show again braincell x 1
  11. Most would agree that starting any business is a risk , Limited companies are a legal entity and they carry the can if things go wrong, not the directors or shareholders , generally this works and creates more business for the UK , many individuals would not take risks and invest in start up new businesses if they could possibly lose everything they own.
    Of course there are always those who take the piss and are out and out crooks but being a director of a limited company does not protect you from criminal prosecution for say fraud , owing money is a civil matter .
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Newly established Ltd's, from my own experience, need to have the money to get anything and will not get lines of credit anyway.

    The problem is the more established firms; if someone buys in, inherits, or the long time owner goes rogue. Build up bigger and bigger lines of credit, slowly, not quickly, give huge dividends and bonus' to the directors, buy office furniture and decorations that fit quite nnicely into the family home, pass of holiday travel as business trips, use corporate fuel cards for he family. Without painting the full picture you get the idea.

    Even at a personal level for myself if we retire in Euro-land we have credit cards from US banks with a combined credit limit of well over 100K. And they have no power to do anything other than write us snotty letters in europe. I know of at least one bloke who pissed off to the US from he UK with a couple of million of 'assets'. UK investigators flew out to speak with him and asked him to return he money - he told them to pi55 oph, end of. By the by, he wasn't a mate I used to know some on the investigation team.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  13. Grownup_Rafbrat

    Grownup_Rafbrat LE Book Reviewer Good Egg (charities)

    Private Equity, Hedge Funds, Asset Strippers, reducing thriving companies near you to the poor house. That's where the law needs serious amendment.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  14. I apologise as it is digressing a tad from the original thread title and theme, but it all costs us money indirectly.

    With the Mrs working mainly for banks during her career I hear all the dirt that does not make it to the customers ear. We whinge and complain about banks making money hand over fist, but....what you do not hear about is how much they have to absorb as losses.

    Creditcard fraud alone costs them a fortune and I don't mean 5 or 6 million quid a year, not even 10 or 20 million quid a year. The Mrs has been head of HR for the credit card divisions of two banks and in both cases losses just from fraud were in excess of 100 million a year, that is card cloning fraud. Then you add on deliberate non-payment by people who take a card with no intention of ever paying it back - saw a few students at uni doing that and then suddenly realising their credit rating would be dinged forever unless they became sensible.

    Then on top of creditcards there are car loans, in store loans, etc, etc, etc,.... their abuse and misuse all affects the wider population, regarding them as cheeky chappies and clever crafty beggars is not doing anyone any favours.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  15. I have previously had the benefits of various corporate structures and off shore registrations explained to me in great detail by the BiL - as he implemented a few over his career. If you can pay for the expert advice a company can be structured in such a way that you can make millions, or strip millions, and never pay tax on it.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2