Pakistani civil war, can the UK accept refugees?

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by armchair_jihad, Apr 26, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. I have been thinking about this a lot recently and the article below from todays Observer by my favorite leftie writer Nick Cohen has prompted this post.

    Hopefully it won't get holed or hijacked, Its my firm belief that Pakistan is on the way out and it will break up into a number of States - its default position. This conflict is going to release an absolute flood of refugess looking for a safe haven, the vast majority of these will be the holders of western values and in many cases educations. In addition many will have blood relatives as UK Citizens.

    What to do?

    from the article
    In full

    One things for sure we are past the highwater mark of Globalisation.
  2. It's a sad situation certainly, however we have enough problems with people from that "neck of the woods" and thats whilst we still "trust" the Pakistani intelligence service.

    The UK is full to busting at the moment, our economy is in turmoil, our own security services are already overwhelmed monitoring the current number of refugees and immigrants we already have here. We have neither the room, the money & for many of the population we do not have the tolerance.

    As you've said here: "Women, Christians, Sufi Muslims and democrats are already fleeing the advancing Taliban" its a terrible shame. But, the UK has a duty of care to it's own citizens before thinking of others. If these people hold western values, what's to stop them from going to France, Germany or a safe muslim country like Turkey?

    There is no more Empire, we are no longer in a position to provide aid to all and sundry. Even in this situation the UK should not be the default choice for refugees. I have family in the US and Oz, that doesn't grant me citizenship; I'd still have to work at it to move there.

    At the end of the day if they want to stop their own country falling into turmoil, they should fight for it, or for their own state from the fallout fragments.
  3. My bold

    your right on all your points and my bold is something i have said about many recent conflicts, no matter how unpleasant it is to see the suffering and destruction wrought upon the innocent and weak. the whole region is a mess. but its not our mess, i do consider that the instant sunshine falling into the wrong hands wont be good though!
  4. If Civil war breaks out they will come in their millions... there is nothing anyone can, or indeed will do to stop it. Welcome to the HRA and decades of bending over national interest and colonial guilt coming home to roost.
  5. Sorry to add, if a rigorous system of letting a tiny number into the UK was enforced, immigrants might actually feel a sense of gratitude and great fortune to be allowed in. I have been to Pakistan a number of times and let me tell you that the UK is seen as weak and a meal ticket.... no doubt about that whatsoever

    Sorry rambling now
  6. Don't get me wrong I am no supporter of the current immigration policies but we cannot wipe our hands of the Pakistan problem and say it is not our problem for two reasons.

    1. This country did a horrendous amount of damage to that region during our Empirical jaunts; carving up the region with silly lines on maps that meant nothing to the indigenous population - the Durrand line is a good example.

    2. ( and most important by far) This country can ill afford to have a failed nation state in that part of the world. To do so would create a terrorist organisation with the military/civil/economic machinery of a recognised government.

    If we fail to support Pakistan now then the cost will be far higher down range.
  7. Agreed.IIRC Pakistan has nuclear capability-imagine that geting into the 'wrong' hands. :!:
  8. I am sure that India is probably more nervous of this issue than we are, half a world away. On the immigration issue, I agre with an earlier poster. If the immigration screening is done well then we should certainly help out.
  9. Agreed, we did a lot of damage. A bloody long time ago.

    Do we still hold modern Germans culpable for the behaviour of their Grandfathers/Great Grandfathers for carving up Europe and the death camps? No. That was 60ish years ago, as was the partition of India.
    Governments "down there" have had plenty of time and plenty of foreign investment to get their act together. We have allowed huge amounts of immigration from Pakistan since then. It would not surprise me if in some way this has exacerbated the situation by allowing hundreds of thousands of possible moderates to move here. Thus leaving room for the bad gits to get in to positions of influence within the current government of Pakistan.

    But no, we are not responsible, we can ill afford (financially & militarily) more peacekeeping duties in that region, can you imagine the backlash in the UK from the current crop of militant muslims we have at home if we were to even try and stick our noses into Pakistan today?

    If it all goes tits up, buckets of instant sunshine all round :D
  10. we need to try and prop up pakistan as the alternative is too horrendous to even contemplate.

    FWIW if we took lots of pakistani's we would get lots of people who would make a net contribution to the country, professional people, enterpenurs, even just plain old hardworkers etc and HRA or know HRA it would be our duty to take our fair share.... but not our unfair share.

  11. We'll be a muslim state within two hundred years anyway, so let them all in.
  12. Get rid of the HRA and then take none!

    It is NOT our problem and all of their problems are home-grown ones.
  13. 'Vast majority', 'western values' ?

    :lol: :lol: :lol:
  14. How do we know who is Friend and who is Foe?

    Perhaps this is a part of the long term plans of the Terrorist?
  15. A more realsitic estimate is 50 years mate