Pakistan friend of the Taliban?

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by TheBigUn, Jun 28, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. From todays Daily Torygraph

    Pakistan procrastinates

    Is it time for us to try to take a tougher stance with Pakistan or are we p*ssing into the wind?
  2. What are you suggesting? Another illegal, unsanctioned war perhaps?
  3. What's got to be remembered that elements of the Pakistani government are as corrupt as can be (nothing new there-same as many other countries) and that parts of Pakistan such as the tribal areas mentioned are so lawless that even Pakistani forces won't dare venture into them.

    So all and all, this story is a non-story to be honest. Well done the Torygraph, hurrah! :roll:
  4. I agree with Andyroo as well. Your just pi**ing in the wind!
  5. Not far off with your comment. The futility of it all astounds me.
  6. We're not pi*sing in the wind, they're p*ssing all over us and the Yanks. They've got what they want in terms of the huge aid packages that have been afforded them by the U.S. At the end of the day Pakistan is a majority Muslim country. Even those that are not openly in support of the U.S/Pakistani government would sooner help out their Muslim Jihadi brothers. Yes, Musharaf is putting his neck on the line somewhat by tackling the extremeist elements in the country, but to what end? He is a MILITARY dictator right? ,he needs to be seen to be carrying out his duties as the man in charge and a General.
  7. So what do you suggest, we all go invading Pakistan and rid the Taliban there too!!!.
  8. ???? Not at all. That would be an almighty gang-f*ck. Just believe that to class Pakistan as allies is silly. As The_Matelot said, this story is pretty much a non-story.
  9. Since the ISS carefully selected who'd they funnel US money to during the Soviet occupation of the Stan, I 'd pretty safely safe that it's the ISS who helped create the Taliban. So pretty much a non story
  10. Why don't they use the MOAB bombs on the Taliban in the hills,They are ve big( 2000lbs) and kill everything within a mile of the impact zone.
  11. I think you missed a 0 out of the Mother Of All Bombs payload figure! IIRFC, this is the beastie that gets hoofed out of the back of a Herc and does a daisycutter with 23000lbs worth of whiz bang.
  12. It is the very same one rickshaw.Even better with another 0 on it, kill more of the barstewards.
  13. The ISI have a long standing relationship with the Taliban, that can not be denied and I wouldn't be surprised if the Pakistanis are trying to play both sides but the main thing that has to be understood about this whole situation is that:

    Karzai, the mayor of Kabul, hates Pakistan and in turn the Pakistani Government and the ISI hates him back.

    But a couple of thoughts:

    South Asian Perspective
    1)Karzai's claim over the Durand Line (Paks are uber sensitive about this)
    2)No one sees, Karzai as a long runner, western propaganda aside the Taliban still hold popular support amongst the Pashtuns.
    3)Going back to the Durand line, a group of Pashtuns, who support the status quo is better than ones who don't.
    4)Karzai closer relations with the Indians, Pakistans hate this and suspect that the Indians have been supporting the Sadars (tribal goons) in Balochistan using Afghanistan as a base with tacit approval from Karzai. The violence in Balochistan is threatening Musharraf's designs for the new Gwadar port.
    5) Gwadar is Musharraf's legacy to Pakistan, he and other believe that a successful port in Gwadar will not only bring Pakistan economic prosperity but will add to Pakistan's strategic power, the chinese have financed the building of this port as apart of their string of Pearls Strategy.
    6) A port in Gwadar makes it less likely that the Indians could destroy the Pak Navy as they did.
    7) Gwadar is important and in a round about way Karzai is threatening this.

    War on Terror Perspective

    1) In the original offensive against the 'terrorists' the Pakistanis focused exclusively on Al Qaeda and the Foreign terrorists.
    2) Unlike now where the Taliban and Al Qaeda are seen as being part of one organisation (in popular culture at least) in the minds of the Pakistanis and certain other elements this was not the case and the Taliban were allowed to drift away.
    3) The US support for Karzai now means that the Pakistanis are being to forced to deal with the Talibans in the tribal areas.
    4) The Taliban are often members of important tribes whose inhabitants live in both Pakistan and Afghanistan - so basically attack one section of the tribe, you attack the other. So the problems that the Pakistanis have been facing the Tribal areas.
    5) Many in the Pakistani government do not see, why they should support the Karzai and think that the Taliban is good for Pakistan
    6) The war of terror is not popular in Pakistan, its certainly not popular in the tribal regions - but saying that the tribal elders have brokered a ceasefire in Wasiristan.
    7) The British and the Americans are forcing unnecessary democratisation on Pakistan, if Bhutto or Sharif returns then the country will suffer and so will the war on terror at least in Pakistan will collapse.

    1) The attacks on the Taliban in a converse way have strengthened the hold that certain Taliban tribes have on certain sections of the tribal region.
    2) The ceasefire in allows for the Pakistan government to talk to the Pakistani tribal elders and re-establish links with central government and hopefully weaken the Taliban hold.
    3) The war in the tribal areas between the Taliban and the Pakistanis has not been popular with the non-combatants being more and more frustrated with sides.
    4) However the ceasefire also in theory allows the Taliban to focus all their energies in Afghanistan.