Order of the White Feather for Windbag Williams

#1
A couple of Blogs and Forums are starting the above campaign.

Requirements: Envelope, Stamp & White Feather (or image thereof)

Send to:

Dr Rowan Williams
Betrayer of the Faith
Lambeth Palace
London
SE1 7JU
 

Attachments

#2
Hmmm. Not sure he's guilty of cowardice - no more than any other Anglican, that is - but he is guilty of mind-numbing stupidity and of a betrayal of his own Church and everything it stands for.

Not bad for an afternoon's work, that.

One up the hoop to him from me.

(edite to add that the 'one up the hoop' would be a boot, not anything vulgar or horrid).
 
#3
Order of the 9mm would seem more appropriate...
 
#4
as a b o c he should be lambasting the cuntries under forms of sharia law on the drugs export business. Fukc these people who want to have a 2 tier society.
 
#6
King_of_the_Burpas said:
Hmmm. Not sure he's guilty of cowardice - no more than any other Anglican, that is - but he is guilty of mind-numbing stupidity and of a betrayal of his own Church and everything it stands for.

Not bad for an afternoon's work, that.

One up the hoop to him from me.

(edite to add that the 'one up the hoop' would be a boot, not anything vulgar or horrid).
As if.

However, Williams is a man who has a known track record of backing down from his lofty moral ground in the face of pressure.
 
#7
I don't see how his statements are cowardice.

In fact, given the inevitabilty of the knee-jek pasting that they've got I think an argument can be made that speaking out in this way is actually rather brave, whether you agree with his point of view or not.
 
#8
I have just snorted beer out of my nose!

"The only good thing about Dr Rowan Williams is that, being a Christian, once I've stabbed him in one side of his face, he has to turn the other cheek so I can easily pierce the other side of his smug, hairy twat-face.

And then we can start calling him "Kit" Williams. As in "assembly kit". As in one lamp-post; one length of rope; one illiberal, Welsh, Archbishop of Canterbury: some assembly required."


There is a deep Moral Cowardice in the Liberal church establishment he represents: the unwillingness to say no, that is wrong for fear of being accused of racism or some failure to accept all forms of "otherness" on any terms. You choose to live in a country, you abide by the law of this country and not carve one out for yourself.

I have an idea: he can go to Saudi and pass out some Bibles
 
#9

Biped

LE
Book Reviewer
#10
Fcuk me! How many ARRSERS have posted up on that blog FFS?

The Rev is just putting his metaphorical beach towel on a blasphemy-outrage sun lounger before they are all taken.
 
#11
Tom_of_Bedlam said:
I don't see how his statements are cowardice.

In fact, given the inevitabilty of the knee-jek pasting that they've got I think an argument can be made that speaking out in this way is actually rather brave, whether you agree with his point of view or not.
Not really; he was reportedly "shocked" by the reaction. Which begs the question: just how fcuking stupid IS he?! 8O

At the end of the day, he's a just stupid little man with very little real power and influence outside of his increasingly meaningless organisation.

Both politicians and real people will have a good laugh at William's pathetic ramblings, then go back to ignoring the cnut. :roll:
 
#13
So many posters, so many who have not read the Archbishop's lecture. (Surprized you are in that bag 'Cad').

I have suspected for some months that this site is geared to: 'half-brainers' and New Labour apologists. (Remember: New Labour does not do God).

In Bliar's Britain an intellect is something to be avoided, or deprecated by the lame-brains resident in government and in the republican Murdoch's media world. It is, therefore, to be regretted that the Archbishop has intellect in spades!

READ THE ARCHBISHOP'S ENTIRE LECTURE, THEN YOU MAY COMMENT.
 
#14
Why should I listen to a grown man with a make-believe friend who tells him what to do?

This does not however make me Neue Arbeit.

If you wish to believe then knock yourself out but do not think that by foisting this bullsh1t upon me you are doing me a favour.

This applies to every religion out there.
 
#15
lsquared said:
So many posters, so many who have not read the Archbishop's lecture. (Surprized you are in that bag 'Cad').

I have suspected for some months that this site is geared to: 'half-brainers' and New Labour apologists. (Remember: New Labour does not do God).

In Bliar's Britain an intellect is something to be avoided, or deprecated by the lame-brains resident in government and in the republican Murdoch's media world. It is, therefore, to be regretted that the Archbishop has intellect in spades!

READ THE ARCHBISHOP'S ENTIRE LECTURE, THEN YOU MAY COMMENT.
I have. Three times. And all the subsequent "clarifications" plus the transcript of the BBC interview. Good job I have the ability to suspend boredom really.

I know what he is saying and understand the issues involved. Williams is a highly intelligent theologian attempting to rationalise the interaction of the legal system with religious beliefs, suggesting that suitable accomodations could be reached.

And he is still a cnut.
 
#17
I think he did not think about what he was saying before hand and the implications that would occur .

I think he should make a public apology for not thinking things through properly .
 
#18
lsquared said:
So many posters, so many who have not read the Archbishop's lecture. (Surprized you are in that bag 'Cad').

I have suspected for some months that this site is geared to: 'half-brainers' and New Labour apologists. (Remember: New Labour does not do God).

In Bliar's Britain an intellect is something to be avoided, or deprecated by the lame-brains resident in government and in the republican Murdoch's media world. It is, therefore, to be regretted that the Archbishop has intellect in spades!

READ THE ARCHBISHOP'S ENTIRE LECTURE, THEN YOU MAY COMMENT.
I'm more concerned with the hypocrisy of the New Arbeit Sozis who in one breath are critising Williams whilst financing multiple wives (illegal under our law), arranged marriage (Or rape as we call it under English Law) Islamic banking and lets not forget the unlawful animal cruelty endemic in their ritual slaughter of animals.

We already have a two tiered legal system thanks to our despised and corrupt government.

Williams has probably done us all a favour by drawing attention to the covert government policy of appeasing our resident evil!
 
#20
So, was he speaking about civil law or criminal law?

"People may legally devise their own way to settle a dispute in front of an agreed third party as long as both sides agree to the process."

It happens all the time. It's usually called arbitration and is cheaper than going through the route of the civil courts and blood-sucking barristers.

Two Jews who have a dispute might agree to ask the Rabbi to arbitrate, two Muslims could ask their Imam. And really, who gives a flying fcuk?

I don't think he was speaking of Sharia law in the context of chopping off hands/heads, stoning and hangings. But why let the mere details of what what he did say get in the way of a tabloid sensationist story.

Or have I missed something here? Quite possible, since I haven't read any of it.
 

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top