Operation Chastise

Discussion in 'Military History and Militaria' started by singha61, May 16, 2012.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Tonight marks the 69th anniversary of the start of Operation Chastise, better known as the Dambusters raid. A combination of the shear genius of Barnes Wallis' bouncing bomb and the incredible bravery of the men of 617 Squadron caused a huge amount of damage to Germany's weapons production at a cost of 53 aircrew killed in action

    The Dambusters - The First Dam - YouTube

    Top secret film made from a german soldier during his vacation risking his life. Filmed at the early morning of May 17th 1943 from the north bound of the dam.

    Secret german film of destroyed eder dam 1943 - YouTube

  2. An inspiring operation, but the effects on the German war economy are debatable. Propaganda wise it was outstanding.
  3. History disagrees just based on the logistics of rebuilding the dams slowing down the Atlantic Wall
  4. Whether it did or didnt effect the German War economy it was bloody brilliant and will go down in the legend of British Military history.
  5. Grumblegrunt

    Grumblegrunt LE Book Reviewer

    article the other day on the historical perspective being sour grapes and it knocking 6 months of production on the atlantic wall as mentioned and the fact it cost the equivalent of 5 billion to sort out. it meant that rommel commanded beaches without fortifications and the lads storming ashore maybe had an easier time of it.

    probably more important is the amount of guns and ordinance the germans kept back from the front because they feared a repeat which deserves a well done in anyones book as those 88's doubled as tank killers.
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Wordsmith

    Wordsmith LE Book Reviewer

    Barnes Wallis always thought one of the biggest mistakes of Chastise was not to make follow up raids on the dams to retard repair. One way this could have been done was with a couple of squadrons of mosquito's bombing from 3,000 feet on nights with a new moon - this was the height above the worst of the light flak, but below the height that heavier anti-aircraft guns could track fast moving targets. Even one or two 1,000 lb bombs into the scaffolding would have caused an appreciable delay.

    As it was, the Germans only just got the dams repaired in time for them to fill to full capacity over the winter - had they been at reduced capacity, that would have impacted on German steel production in 1944 - and hence on German armament production.

    This isn't hindsight either - Wallis was urging the bombing at the time...

  7. Why would anybody deploy heavy AA guns to defend targets which had to be attacked at at a height where the bombers were within rifle range -- that's a job for 20mm and 40mm light flak. And how would you have used those 88's in an anti tank role? It needed an 11.5 ton Sonderkraftfahrzeug 7 prime mover at least to haul an 88 across country and there were never enough of those available for the guns the Luftwaffe already owned. The British had 3.7 inch AA guns coming out of their ears but nobody ever fired one at a German tank because there was no transport available to get them off road.
  8. Grumblegrunt

    Grumblegrunt LE Book Reviewer

    probably because the standard air defense usually involved big guns and big lights just like over here. and just like over here they were probably more for keeping the locals happy and peppered with shrapnel. taking flak refers to the german cannon.

    88mm Flak Series - Flugabwehrkanone

    any diversion of assets was usefull I imagine when your cunning plan involved untried techniques, secret equipment, pipelines under the channel and lots of men running up the beach. those 88's I imagine would mess up a landing craft just as well. :)
  9. I'm always bemused by the claims made about certain actions or operations shortening the war by so many months or years. If someone had got things in order and arranged them consecutively, the war would have ended in 1938!
  10. The Germans responded quickly to this resounding attack by developing , within months , their own version of the " Bouncing Bomb " . They dismantled a recovered bomb which had failed to explode and their version included an interesting enhancement .... see video at about 27 secs ...

  11. By digging them into defence works along the German/French, German/Dutch and Polish/Soviet borders?
    • Like Like x 1
  12. At that period of the war the positive effect on morale of such a raid was absolutely enormous, especially from the point of view of those who were being bombed almost nightly. Clearly the Germans gave enormous priority to repairing the damage and this can only have been at the expense of other projects. The raids, on the whole, achieved their aim and they gave hope to our population as well as showing the German people that we could strike into the heart of Germany and with great precision. To say they achieved little because the repairs were effected in 6 months is tripe, for 6 months Germany was fighting with one arm in a sling and was having to ration ball bearings. How many lives were saved because the Germans weren't 100% effective?

    We should pay more attention the extraordinary courage and skill of the men who flew these raids and not look to downplay their efforts and achievements in purely economic or productive terms.
    • Like Like x 4
  13. I've always thought that the knock on effect was that the Germans had to have a major rethink about strategic bottle necks, which then HAD to be defended against a possible attack, this meant diverting men and materials to places far removed from the 'real' war, every dam was a potential target, fighting men had to be used in case of attack. The heavy water plant in Norway, all the assorted areas attacked by commandoes, etc. The Germans were as short, if not shorter, than the British as regards man power. All the stomach, and ENT battalions the Germans used to man the west wall and low threat areas weren't because they were equal opportunity employers.
  14. 88's were used extensively by the Germans in the anti - tank role, to devastating effect.
  15. AlienFTM

    AlienFTM LE Book Reviewer

    If they were going to use Mossies, why not fly them in on the next full moon with Highballs instead of Upkeeps, same mission, smaller bomb? The damage was done: this would be about, as you say, retarding repair.

    They surely would never expect the same mission a month on, then when Mossies fly over the coast, "They will not be carrying Upkeeps to bomb the Ruhr dams."