• ARRSE have partnered with Armadillo Merino to bring you an ARRSE exclusive, generous discount offer on their full price range.
    To keep you warm with the best of Merino gear, visit www.armadillomerino.co.uk and use the code: NEWARRSE40 at the checkout to get 40% off!
    This superb deal has been generously offered to us by Armadillo Merino and is valid until midnight on the the 28th of February.

Only white Britains can be racist?

#1
Any British person displaying the most moderate sense of nationalistic feeling is instantly branded a “racist” — but a former teacher in Tower Hamlets has revealed how intense anti-British racism and hatred by Muslims is tolerated and ignored by the authorities.

Former teacher Nicholas Kafouris, a Greek Cypriot, has accused the authorities at Bigland Green Primary School of “upholding racism” by ignoring complaints that the Muslim children in the school were violently anti-Semitic and anti-Christian.

Mr Kafouris told an employment tribunal that the Muslim children, many as young as eight years old, “openly hailed September 11 hijackers as heroes” and said they wanted to be “Islamic bombers” when they grew up.

Mr Kafouris said his concerns were dismissed by the school in Shadwell and he is suing Tower Hamlets council, the school, head teacher and the assistant head for racial discrimination.

The 12-year veteran teacher described in the opening of the Central London Employment Tribunal this week that his pupils’ attitudes changed after the September 11 attacks in 2001.

He said he had to order his pupils to stop making remarks such as “We hate the Jews” and “the Christians and Jews are our enemies.”

He said he filled out a Racist Incident Reporting Sheet but claimed head teacher Jill Hankey dismissed his concerns and was “vicariously upholding racism and religious hatred.”

The refusal to act against the Muslim children’s outbursts is in marked contrast to the treatment being dished out to ethnically British children at schools across the country.

In October 2009, it was revealed in a report from the Manifesto Club civil liberties group that as many as 40,000 children are officially branded “racists” each year as Government rules force schools to investigate every playground incident for “racial bias.”

The report revealed that one child had been “severely disciplined” for calling two other children a “chocolate bar.” The report, titled “The Myth of Racist Kids”, said around 280,000 such incidents have been reported by teachers across Britain since the rules were introduced in 2002.

Schools Minister Diana Johnson was quoted at the time as saying that “If racist bullying is not dealt with in schools, this will send a powerful message to children that racism is acceptable, not only in schools but in society as a whole.”

It seems that this attitude only applies when white British people are involved, and the Muslim community, which has special status with Tories and Labour alike, are exempt.

In a statement submitted to the tribunal, Mr Kafouris said: “Amongst Ms Hankey’s justifications for the child’s remarks she said: `If the child was older say 15, I might take it more seriously, he’s only nine, he’s only doing it to wind you up.’

“I felt the head’s behaviour and conduct towards me amounted to direct religious discrimination. I was intimidated in the way she spoke to me which indicated ‘Don’t come back with such issues again’,” he said.

One law for British people, another for the colonisers.
 
#3
Goes along with the old argument, why is it when a black bloke attacks a white bloke, its called an assault, yet when a white bloke attacks a black bloke, its called a racial motivated assault?



Cue the racist bigot remarks, but you cannot be racist if you are coloured to any degree, its only us whities who are racist.
 
#6
As much as i agree with the sentiment, where is the link? Where is this article from?

Edit: If i was Salford uni i would ban them for not being able to spell socialise correctly.
 
#8
harareboy99 said:
As much as i agree with the sentiment, where is the link? Where is this article from?

Edit: If i was Salford uni i would ban them for not being able to spell socialise correctly.
Daily mail online ; feb 9
 
#9
Sorry Fellas. I nicked a lad for Racially aggravated assault.

He was Black, from St Vincents and was attacking another black lad from Jamaica if memory serves. He N-Bombed whilst carrying out the assault, and I nicked him. In my statement said I was offended by his use of Ni99er and sure enough, rather than a straight assault it went down (and so did he) for Racially aggravated crime.

Fact is white people don't feel that society is biased racially against them, so don't make the complaint. If you feel that a crime perpetrated against you was racially motivated, say so and stick to your guns.
 
#11
msr said:
And the Student Union at Salford refuse to do anything about this.

'Do you want to socialise with your own people'?
'Own people' being other pupils visiting from Pakistan, as opposed to slightly brown British citizens.

You should have highlighted the 'Do you want to maintain peace and unity between Pakistan and other countries?' question for your quote, because that way you could have made it sound like they have a REALLY racist hidden agenda... :roll:
 
#12
MrShanklysboots said:
Sorry Fellas. I nicked a lad for Racially aggravated assault.

He was Black, from St Vincents and was attacking another black lad from Jamaica if memory serves. He N-Bombed whilst carrying out the assault, and I nicked him. In my statement said I was offended by his use of Ni99er and sure enough, rather than a straight assault it went down (and so did he) for Racially aggravated crime.

Fact is white people don't feel that society is biased racially against them, so don't make the complaint. If you feel that a crime perpetrated against you was racially motivated, say so and stick to your guns.
Hey I'm just an old white guy so what would I know..but in my estimation 'assault' is the primary crime..the rest is you sticking you nose up your 'diversity co-ordinators jacksey' for extra 'brownie' points...offended by the word 'ni99er'..??..as opposed to e.g. 'opening the other guys head with a brick'..but hey I forget your part of the 'Police service'..the basic premise of reaction to 'law breaking' is not a reflex..
 
#13
BlueDanubeWalt said:
MrShanklysboots said:
Sorry Fellas. I nicked a lad for Racially aggravated assault.

He was Black, from St Vincents and was attacking another black lad from Jamaica if memory serves. He N-Bombed whilst carrying out the assault, and I nicked him. In my statement said I was offended by his use of Ni99er and sure enough, rather than a straight assault it went down (and so did he) for Racially aggravated crime.

Fact is white people don't feel that society is biased racially against them, so don't make the complaint. If you feel that a crime perpetrated against you was racially motivated, say so and stick to your guns.
Hey I'm just an old white guy so what would I know..but in my estimation 'assault' is the primary crime..the rest is you sticking you nose up your 'diversity co-ordinators jacksey' for extra 'brownie' points...offended by the word 'ni99er'..??..as opposed to e.g. 'opening the other guys head with a brick'..but hey I forget your part of the 'Police service'..the basic premise of reaction to 'law breaking' is not a reflex..
Sorry you feel that way. If some young scrote started effing and blinding and dropping racist remarks alles uber die platz, I'd make sure I highlighted it in my report too. I can't say that I'd personally be offended were it me on the receiving end (I do have rather rhino-like skin) but I'd want to make sure the 'racist' label was well and truly hung round the little fucker's neck once and for all. After all, if he's not told or shown that what he's said is offensive, why would he ever feel the need to stop saying it?
 
#14
Here in the States it's long been known that only Whitey can be racist. Apparently no one bothered to pay the international postage so that you'd get the memo...
 
#15
skintboymike said:
BlueDanubeWalt said:
MrShanklysboots said:
Sorry Fellas. I nicked a lad for Racially aggravated assault.

He was Black, from St Vincents and was attacking another black lad from Jamaica if memory serves. He N-Bombed whilst carrying out the assault, and I nicked him. In my statement said I was offended by his use of Ni99er and sure enough, rather than a straight assault it went down (and so did he) for Racially aggravated crime.

Fact is white people don't feel that society is biased racially against them, so don't make the complaint. If you feel that a crime perpetrated against you was racially motivated, say so and stick to your guns.
Hey I'm just an old white guy so what would I know..but in my estimation 'assault' is the primary crime..the rest is you sticking you nose up your 'diversity co-ordinators jacksey' for extra 'brownie' points...offended by the word 'ni99er'..??..as opposed to e.g. 'opening the other guys head with a brick'..but hey I forget your part of the 'Police service'..the basic premise of reaction to 'law breaking' is not a reflex..
Sorry you feel that way. If some young scrote started effing and blinding and dropping racist remarks alles uber die platz, I'd make sure I highlighted it in my report too. I can't say that I'd personally be offended were it me on the receiving end (I do have rather rhino-like skin) but I'd want to make sure the 'racist' label was well and truly hung round the little fucker's neck once and for all. After all, if he's not told or shown that what he's said is offensive, why would he ever feel the need
to stop saying it?
Need to read 'n' note my 'bolds' and apply that which is sadly missing...'application of the obvious'...a 'black calling another black'..'Guy Gibsons Labrador'...'racial' means just that...think about it..!!..
 
#16
I'm perplexed but then I'm from Co Down. Surely righteous hate knows no creed or color and is the collateral damage of a free(ish) society?

To some extent mindless bigotry is sanctioned by all of the various Abrahamic scriptures. Those who are observant of these traditions may therefore get on our nipple ends. I think it might be healthier to recognize this, draw a breath and move fecking on.

Numpties setting their testicles afire should not distract us from this.
 
#17
MrShanklysboots said:
Sorry Fellas. I nicked a lad for Racially aggravated assault.

He was Black, from St Vincents and was attacking another black lad from Jamaica if memory serves. He N-Bombed whilst carrying out the assault, and I nicked him. In my statement said I was offended by his use of Ni99er and sure enough, rather than a straight assault it went down (and so did he) for Racially aggravated crime.

Fact is white people don't feel that society is biased racially against them, so don't make the complaint. If you feel that a crime perpetrated against you was racially motivated, say so and stick to your guns.
On the one hand I am heartened by your final paragraph - it seems to me to be very sensible - racism works both ways. But.. on the other hand I do wonder whether we (black, white, other) should be wasting our time on this crap.

If I have a civilised party at my place and there are black people there, am I better than the host who has none? Should I have gay guests? Jews? Roman Catholics? CofE? Agnostics? Atheists? Should I have some with risque political views to add a certain frisson to the affair?

If someone breaks the law they should be prosecuted. The court should decide on the sentence. I don't particularly care about their skin colour, ethnicity, or religion. Why the bloody hell does this
'racial/ethnic/religious' crap interfere with the process of law? If I smack you over the head with a bottle because you are fat is that worse than if you are ginger/skinny/black/muslim/christian. The charge should be the same for all: Assault. Possibly GBH.

It annoys me that we have had plenty of perfectly good laws to deal with crimes over the ages, but the current government has chosen to legislate on a biblical scale 'to show they care' about 'minorities'.

I pray for the day when the UK gets back to the laws of old for all people - black, white, yellow; christian, muslim, agnostic, and atheist.
 
#18
Oyibo said:
MrShanklysboots said:
Sorry Fellas. I nicked a lad for Racially aggravated assault.

He was Black, from St Vincents and was attacking another black lad from Jamaica if memory serves. He N-Bombed whilst carrying out the assault, and I nicked him. In my statement said I was offended by his use of Ni99er and sure enough, rather than a straight assault it went down (and so did he) for Racially aggravated crime.

Fact is white people don't feel that society is biased racially against them, so don't make the complaint. If you feel that a crime perpetrated against you was racially motivated, say so and stick to your guns.
On the one hand I am heartened by your final paragraph - it seems to me to be very sensible - racism works both ways. But.. on the other hand I do wonder whether we (black, white, other) should be wasting our time on this crap.

If I have a civilised party at my place and there are black people there, am I better than the host who has none? Should I have gay guests? Jews? Roman Catholics? CofE? Agnostics? Atheists? Should I have some with risque political views to add a certain frisson to the affair?

I have guests at my parties whom I like or whom I respect, they can be any and all of the above as long as they're good people because there are only two types of people, good and bad, nothing else matters as it is only superficial.


If someone breaks the law they should be prosecuted. The court should decide on the sentence. I don't particularly care about their skin colour, ethnicity, or religion. Why the bloody hell does this
'racial/ethnic/religious' crap interfere with the process of law? If I smack you over the head with a bottle because you are fat is that worse than if you are ginger/skinny/black/muslim/christian. The charge should be the same for all: Assault. Possibly GBH.

I think the idea is to differentiate between just a drunken brawl and a targeted attack because someone is black or brown or a squaddie etc.

It annoys me that we have had plenty of perfectly good laws to deal with crimes over the ages, but the current government has chosen to legislate on a biblical scale 'to show they care' about 'minorities'.

Amen to that

I pray for the day when the UK gets back to the laws of old for all people - black, white, yellow; christian, muslim, agnostic, and atheist.

I pray for the days when people judge people by their actions rather than their appearance.
 
#19
Markintime said:
I pray for the days when people judge people by their actions rather than their appearance.
Sounds like a bit of a dream, to me. :wink:

Anybody can be a racist, but it seems that the only universal agreement on racism is that it's something other people do.
 
#20
msr said:
And the Student Union at Salford refuse to do anything about this.

'Do you want to socialise with your own people'?
I went to Salford and there is no feeling of racism at all. In fact, despite being a white poof I was practically made a member of the Islamic society as I had a lot of friends , including the head of the society, in it and went to a lot of the evenings they put on. I was never made to feel inferior or different by anyone. Trust me, if you turned up at this society, unless the environment and culture of Salford has changed dramatically in the 3 years since I was there, you would be welcomed with open arms.
 

Latest Threads