officers

Discussion in 'RLC' started by masher69, Nov 15, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. if you join the rlc as an officer ,do you stay with one regiment/trade group for the rest of your career or do the move from job to job within the rlc???
     
  2. They move between stores, blankets to duvets to boots,etrc. You get the gist..............
     
  3. An interesting question..

    The forming Corps had differing approaches:

    The RCT followed a very "generalist" formula, with an emphasis on regimental duty. Most technical expertise lay with SNCOS and LE officers.
    RAOC officers all specialised in either Fuel, Ammuniton, Food supply, vehicle design or industrial managment and were trained in stores supply and inventory managment across the piece.
    ACC officers were trained in catering (it is alledged!).
    The Pioneer Corps did not recruit officers directly until very late, and were dependent on transferees, mostly from the infantry. They did latterly attend courses in supervisory management.
    Posties were all (as I understand) LE.

    The prevailing theory since the formation of the Corps is that DE Officers should be "generalists" and that the subject matter experts should be provided by either SNCOs or LE Officers, which was the RCT/Pioneer view..

    Officers are therefore posted to any area where they do not need a specific qualitfication.

    Recently however, it has become apparant that there is a need to re-grow technical expertise in the DE community and that the risks of leaving technical policy work to LE and and amateaur DE officers is becoming noticably high!

    So we may see a change to more specialisation within the officer corps...

    Or maybe not..
     
  4. HE - that is not strictly true. The RLC continues to train and employ specialist ATOs, Pet Offrs, Food Svces Offrs, Posties and Maritime Types. In addition those with a mover background can pop in and out of mov jobs more easily than others might be able to.

    The reason we specialise less is simply that there is no longer a big enough Army to justify lots of deep specialists - the RAOC had c 17 Brigadier ATO tied posts - now there are a few full Colonel jobs.

    Where we have got it wrong is in equating generalist with transport - we have neglected training officers as well as we might in the supply bit of our job (but this is now being addressed).

    To answer the original post, you can pretty much choose to do generalist jobs, or have a mix of specialist and generalist. Many of the current crop of COs have experience in a specialist area but are now doing generalist jobs.

    As for seahorse, of course, in the REME you can choose lots of different areas - Metric, Whitworth, AF and so on. It is not as if you are just turning the same bolts on different bits of kit is it?
     
  5. I wondered how long it would take for a nibble! Perhaps you should remember that in the near fututre BOTH LOGISTIC BDEs will be commanded by a Late REME Brig. Oh sorry, we left you with one didn't we - 104. I am impressed by your engineering knowledge on thread types... top marks. Sadly, whitworth isn't used much anymore!
     
  6. top posts , was expecting some old toss about officers doing f**k all ect
     
  7. An RLC officer 'found' my Leatherman whilst in Iraq and wouldn't give it back. Bastard.
     
  8. Close but no cigar. I reckon at formation approx 30% were LE, 50% were re-treads and 20% were DE.

    P-T
     
  9. Worth pointing out that the recently appointed "DG Logistics" is from the RE!
     
  10. and COS LF is late RLC....blah blah blah
     
  11. I do remember when CILSA was a 2* post, can't quite remember 17 1*, but you may be right. My point is really that the Army needs at least a core of military logistics experts, partularly in areas where there is no civilian equivalent such as in Ammuniton. The "cluster" that are the IPTs is a shining example of where we have seriously lost the plot. The RE seem to be able to retain their officer expertise, so where is the problem with the RLC?

    Not disagreeing with you about the remaining specialist courses in the Corps, however there was a period when specialism was frowned on, and which still continues in the minds of some folk.. This does seem to be changing and not before time. The only way to get experts is to grow them...

    I do think YOs would be better employed learning the stores system, and at least the basics of stock accounting rather than swanning around Leconfield in trucks.
     
  12. I stand corrected....! (but how many did 20% actually account for - can't be many?
     
  13. You might be surprised. At the time Postal was, IIRC, around 700 strong and spread across a Directorate, 2 Depots, 3 Regiments and numerous small 1/2 man dets.

    The top of the tree was a Postie 1* followed by 2/3 Colonels and at least 7 Lt Colonels.

    To give you some idea, the regiment supporting 1 BR Corps had a held strength of around 210 and was established for 10 officer posts.

    I reckon there were around 45 officer slots within Postal, a good 17ish of which were command appointments.


    P-T
     
  14. Yeah but you can take consolation that he wouldn't know how to operate it either.
     
  15. That'll be Master General of Logistics then.