I don't get it. Surely its jam on one half and cream on the other then you can turn them whichever way up to suit the County?
Offending the god botherers
- Thread starter ugly
- Start date
Excognito
LE
You, Sir, are the kind of unmitigated scoundrel that would attempt compromise with Hitler by asking if it was all right if he only used half the Jews for his central heating system.
Pish and fie to you Sir.
And I'll have you know that intend to make Pasties today with Chuck beef!!
No carrots obviously I'm not insane.
And I'll have you know that intend to make Pasties today with Chuck beef!!
No carrots obviously I'm not insane.
Drlligaf
LE
A little thought to wind up the various sky fairy worshipppers.
Leaving aside the various minority religions or those of indingenous peoples world wide, when you consider the so-called major religions, they are all different although christianity and judaism do have a common background. However each group of believers are convinced that theirs is the one and only religion, but it's called belief, not knowing. So on this basis only one of the various religions can be right, that is the very best case scenario and assuming that there is indeed a god. The others of course would then be barking* up the wrong tree.
I think that Stephen Hawking got it right when he said that on the basis of probability there is no god. Therefore religion = much ado about nowt.
* There is perhaps good reason to believe that they are barking anyway.
Leaving aside the various minority religions or those of indingenous peoples world wide, when you consider the so-called major religions, they are all different although christianity and judaism do have a common background. However each group of believers are convinced that theirs is the one and only religion, but it's called belief, not knowing. So on this basis only one of the various religions can be right, that is the very best case scenario and assuming that there is indeed a god. The others of course would then be barking* up the wrong tree.
I think that Stephen Hawking got it right when he said that on the basis of probability there is no god. Therefore religion = much ado about nowt.
* There is perhaps good reason to believe that they are barking anyway.
Excognito
LE
And rest confident in the knowledge that they'll be the hardest Pasties in town ...
Excognito
LE
Not really. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all believe in the same god, even though their views as to his nature may differ. Furthermore, there are several other explicitly monotheistic religions (eg, Sikhism) and others in which the nature of the individual gods can be reasonably regarded as aspects or avatars of a single god.
So the possibility arises that there is but one God and we're merely like the blind gurus attempting to describe an elephant that they can only feel.
javaguzzisti
LE
Around about 1220 Genghis Khan took reps from the Islamic, Christion and Buddist sects into the Kharezmian Mountains and said, 'the great Spirit made all of this for you. Why do you build your silly Palaces for him'.
Sums it up for me.
Any form of worship is errse licking and nobody decent loves errse lickers.
scarbrough
LE
Looks nothing like Jimmy Savile.
Everyone is on board with the late Cardinal Newman being saintified. Everybody, that is, except homosexuals and communists. Are you a communist, Higgsy?
javaguzzisti
LE
FoC.
scarbrough
LE
I'd be surprised if he was both.
javaguzzisti
LE
Why?
crustyrusty
LE
For Sale.
Unwanted gift.
Unwanted gift.
BlackDyke
War Hero
So let me get this one right...
Because St John Cardinal Newman is a 'Jimmy Saville (sic)* lookalike' therefore he must be a Jimmy Savile type offender yes?
It is atheists like you that give atheists like me a bad name.
* It is Savile you thick twat.
javaguzzisti
LE
re-stilly
LE
Does it have a "vent" at the back for all the RC priests to get jiggy with?
re-stilly
LE
Just yes, oh fucking yes...wonder how long until they go bankrupt.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Vatican cash crisis: Holy See loses €44million in a year
Italian journalist Gianluigi Nuzzi (pictured) writes that the Vatican lost nearly €44million (£38million) last year while its property empire made a loss for the first time.
Was it down the back of the Papal sofa, by chance?
I visited St Peter's Basilica in 2007....and the Palace of Versailles a year later....they both brought out previously hidden Leveller sentiments in me..
' "Our case is to be considered thus, that we have been under slavery.
That's acknowledged by all. Our very laws were made by our Conquerors... We are now engaged for our freedom.
That's the end of Parliament, to legislate according to the just ends of government, not simply to maintain what is already established.
Every person in England hath as clear a right to elect his Representative as the greatest person in England. I conceive that's the undeniable maxim of government: that all government is in the free consent of the people."
(3) John Lilburne, Leveller pamphlet (March, 1647)
I visited St Peter's Basilica in 2007....and the Palace of Versailles a year later....they both brought out previously hidden Leveller sentiments in me..
' "Our case is to be considered thus, that we have been under slavery.
That's acknowledged by all. Our very laws were made by our Conquerors... We are now engaged for our freedom.
That's the end of Parliament, to legislate according to the just ends of government, not simply to maintain what is already established.
Every person in England hath as clear a right to elect his Representative as the greatest person in England. I conceive that's the undeniable maxim of government: that all government is in the free consent of the people."
(3) John Lilburne, Leveller pamphlet (March, 1647)
(4) John Lilburne, The Free Man's Freedom Vindicated (1647)
Last edited:
Taffwob
LE
I thought this was the latest Saint.
Though to me The Saint will always be Roger Moore's left eyebrow.
Excognito
LE
Drlligaf
LE
A little dig at the Catholics. We all know about how JC* ended up, betrayed by the Jews because he was a right royal pain to them, or more accurately the pharisees. It was of course the Romans who did the dirty deed.
If we now fast forward, then we note that the Romans as they were are now gone, we do however have Italy (Bella Italia) with its capital Rome, within that city is a the Vatican, HQ of the biggest christian church in the world. So the descendants of the Romans, who crucified JC are now the self appointed guardians of the christian faith.
Meanwhile the Jews are still around, but I think that we can forgive them, as long as they don't do it again.
*All right JC and his disciples were also Jews.
OK even Catholics are human, just would'nt send my son to a catholic kindergarten.
If we now fast forward, then we note that the Romans as they were are now gone, we do however have Italy (Bella Italia) with its capital Rome, within that city is a the Vatican, HQ of the biggest christian church in the world. So the descendants of the Romans, who crucified JC are now the self appointed guardians of the christian faith.
Meanwhile the Jews are still around, but I think that we can forgive them, as long as they don't do it again.
*All right JC and his disciples were also Jews.
OK even Catholics are human, just would'nt send my son to a catholic kindergarten.
