Nuclear and biological attacks... By a USMC geezer

#1
NUCLEAR AND BIOLOGICAL ATTACKS

I was the ABC (Atomic, Biological and Chemical) Officer for my squadron in the U. S. Marine Coups. This is quite accurate and extremely good advice. The risks are small for civilians.

A Soldier's Viewpoint on Surviving Nuclear, Chemical and Biological
Attacks

From: SFC Red Thomas (Ret)Armor Master Gunner, Mesa, AZ

Unlimited reproduction and distribution is authorized. Just give me credit for my work, and, keep it in context.

Since the media has decided to scare everyone with predictions of chemical, biological, or nuclear warfare on our turf I decided to write a paper and keep things in their proper perspective. I am a retired military weapons, munitions, and training expert.

Lesson number one: In the mid 1990s there were a series of nerve gas attacks on crowded Japanese subway stations. Given perfect conditions for an attack less than 10% of the people there were injured (the injured were better in a few hours) and only one percent of the injured died.

60 Minutes once had a fellow telling us that one drop of nerve gas could kill a thousand people, well he didn't tell you the thousand dead people per drop was theoretical.

Drill Sergeants exaggerate how terrible this stuff was to keep the recruits awake in class (I know this because I was a Drill Sergeant too). Forget everything you've ever seen on TV, in the movies, or read in a novel about this stuff, it was all a lie (read this sentence again out loud!). These weapons are about terror, if you remain calm, you will probably not die. This is far less scary than the media and their "Experts," make it sound.

Chemical Weapons

Chemical weapons are categorized as nerve, blood, blister, and Incapacitating agents. Contrary to the hype of reporters and politicians they are not weapons of mass destruction they are "area denial," and terror weapons that don't destroy anything. When you leave the area you almost always leave the risk. That's the difference; you can leave the area and the risk but soldiers may have to stay put and sit through it and that's why they need all that spiffy gear.

These are not gasses; they are vapors and/or air borne particles. The agent must be delivered in sufficient quantity to kill/injure, and that defines when/how it's used. Every day we have a morning and evening inversion where "stuff," suspended in the air gets pushed down. This inversion is why allergies (pollen) and air pollution are worst at these times of the day.

So, a chemical attack will have its best effect an hour of so either side of sunrise/sunset. Also, being vapors and airborne particles they are heavier than air so they will seek low places like ditches, basements and underground garages. This stuff won't work when it's freezing, it doesn't last when it's hot, and wind spreads it too thin too fast. They've got to get this stuff on you, or, get you to inhale it for it to work. They also have to get the concentration of chemicals high enough to kill or wound you. Too little and it's nothing, too much and it's wasted.

What I hope you've gathered by this point is that a chemical weapons attack that kills a lot of people is incredibly hard to do with military grade agents and equipment so you can imagine how hard it will be for terrorists. The more you know about this stuff the more you realize how hard it is to use.





We'll start by talking about nerve agents. You have these in your house, plain old bug killer (like Raid) is nerve agent. All nerve agents work the same way; they are cholinesterase inhibitors that mess up the signals your nervous system uses to make your body function. It can harm you if you get it on your skin but it works best if they can get you to inhale it. If you don't die in the first minute and you can leave the area you're probably gonna live. The military's antidote for all nerve agents is atropine and pralidoxime chloride. Neither one of these does anything to cure the nerve agent, they send your body into overdrive to keep you alive for five minutes, after that the agent is used up. Your best protection is fresh air and staying calm.

Listed below are the symptoms for nerve agent poisoning: Sudden headache, Dimness of vision (someone you're looking at will have pinpointed pupils), runny nose, excessive saliva or drooling, difficulty breathing, tightness in chest, nausea, stomach cramps, twitching of exposed skin where a liquid just got on you.

If you are in public and you start experiencing these symptoms, first ask yourself, did anything out of the ordinary just happen, a loud pop, did someone spray something on the crowd? Are other people getting sick too? Is there an odor of new mown hay, green corn, something fruity, or camphor where it shouldn't be? If the answer is yes, then calmly (if you panic you breathe faster and inhale more air/poison) leave the area and head up wind, or, outside.

Fresh air is the best "right now antidote." If you have a blob of liquid that looks like molasses or Kayro syrup on you; blot it or scrape it off and away from yourself with anything disposable. This stuff works based on your body weight, what a crop duster uses to kill bugs won't hurt you unless you stand there and breathe it in real deep, then lick the residue off the ground for a while. Remember they have to do all the work, they have to get the concentration up and keep it up for several minutes while all you have to do is quit getting it on you/quit breathing it by putting space between you and the attack.

Blood agents are cyanide or arsine which affects your blood's ability to provide oxygen to your tissue. The scenario for attack would be the same as nerve agent. Look for a pop or someone splashing/spraying something and folks around there getting woozy/falling down. The telltale smells are bitter almonds or garlic where it shouldn't be. The symptoms are blue lips, blue under the fingernails rapid breathing. The military's antidote is amyl nitride and just like nerve agent antidote it just keeps your body working for five minutes till the toxins are used up. Fresh air is your best individual chance.

Blister agents (distilled mustard) are so nasty that nobody wants to even handle it let alone use it. It's almost impossible to handle safely and may have delayed effect of up to 12 hours. The attack scenario is also limited to the things you'd see from other chemicals. If you do get large, painful blisters for no apparent reason, don't pop them, if you must, don't let the liquid from the blister get on any other area, the stuff just keeps on spreading. It's just as likely to harm the user as the target. Soap, water, sunshine, and fresh air are this stuff's enemy.

Bottom line on chemical weapons (it's the same if they use industrial chemical spills); they are intended to make you panic, to terrorize you, to heard you like sheep to the wolves. If there is an attack, leave the area and go upwind, or to the sides of the wind stream. They have to get the stuff to you, and on you. You're more likely to be hurt by a drunk driver on any given day than be hurt by one of these attacks. Your odds get better if you leave the area. Soap, water, time, and fresh air really deal this stuff a knock-out-punch. Don't let fears of an isolated attack rule your life. The odds are really on your side.

Nuclear Weapons

Nuclear bombs. These are the only weapons of mass destruction on earth. The effects of a nuclear bomb are heat, blast, EMP, and radiation. If you see a bright flash of light like the sun, where the sun isn't, fall to the ground! The heat will be over a second. Then there will be two blast waves, one out going, and one on its way back. Don't stand up to see what happened after the first wave; anything that's going to happen will have happened in two full minutes.

These will be low yield devices and will not level whole cities. If you live through the heat, blast, and initial burst of radiation, you'll probably live for a very, very long time. Radiation will not create fifty foot tall women, or giant ants and grass hoppers the size of tanks. These will be at the most 1 kiloton bombs; that's the equivalent of 1,000 tons of TNT.

Here's the real deal, flying debris and radiation will kill a lot of exposed (not all!) people within a half mile of the blast. Under perfect conditions this is about a half mile circle of death and destruction, but, when it's done it's done. EMP stands for Electro Magnetic Pulse and it will fry every electronic device for a good distance, it's impossible to say what and how far but probably not over a couple of miles from ground zero is a good guess. Cars, cell phones, computers, ATMs, you name it, all will be out of order.

There are lots of kinds of radiation, you only need to worry about three, the others you have lived with for years. You need to worry about "Ionizing radiation," these are little sub atomic particles that go whizzing along at the speed of light. They hit individual cells in your body, kill the nucleus and keep on going. That's how you get radiation poisoning, you have so many dead cells in your body that the decaying cells poison you.

It's the same as people getting radiation treatments for cancer, only a bigger area gets radiated. The good news is you don't have to just sit there and take it, and there's lots you can do rather than panic. First; your skin will stop alpha particles, a page of a newspaper or your clothing will stop beta particles, you just gotta try and avoid inhaling dust that's contaminated with atoms that are emitting these things and you'll be generally safe from them.

Gamma rays are particles that travel like rays (quantum physics makes my brain hurt) and they create the same damage as alpha and beta particles only they keep going and kill lots of cells as they go all the way through your body. It takes a lot to stop these things, lots of dense material, on the other hand it takes a lot of this to kill you.

Your defense is as always to not panic. Basic hygiene and normal preparation are your friends. All canned or frozen food is safe to eat. The radiation poisoning will not effect plants so fruits and vegetables are OK if there's no dust on em (rinse em off if there is). If you don't have running water and you need to collect rain water or use water from wherever, just let it sit for thirty minutes and skim off the water gently from the top. The dust with the bad stuff in it will settle and the remaining water can be used for the toilet which will still work if you have a bucket of water to pour in the tank.

Biological Weapons

Finally there's biological warfare. There's not much to cover here. Basic personal hygiene and sanitation will take you further than a million doctors. Wash your hands often, don't share drinks, food, sloppy kisses, etc., with strangers. Keep your garbage can with a tight lid on it, don't have standing water (like old buckets, ditches, or kiddie pools) lying around to allow mosquitoes breeding room. This stuff is carried by vectors, which are bugs, rodents, and contaminated material. If biological warfare is as easy as the TV makes it sound, why has Saddam Hussein spent twenty years, millions, and millions of dollars trying to get it right?

If you're clean of person and home you eat well and are active you're Overall preparation for any terrorist attack is the same as you'd take for a big storm. If you want a gas mask, fine, go get one. I know this stuff and I'm not getting one and I told my Mom not to bother with one either (how's that for confidence). We have a week's worth of cash, several days worth of canned goods and plenty of soap and water. We don't leave stuff out to attract bugs or rodents so we don't have them. These people can't conceive a nation this big with this much resources. These weapons are made to cause panic, terror, and to demoralize. If we don't run around like sheep they won't use this stuff after they find out it's no fun. The government is going nuts over this stuff because they have to protect every inch of America. You've only gotta protect yourself, and by doing that, you help the country.

Finally, there are millions of caveats to everything I wrote here and you can think up specific scenarios where my advice isn't the best. This letter is supposed to help the greatest number of people under the greatest number of situations. If you don't like my work, don't nit pick, just sit down and explain chemical, nuclear, and biological warfare in a document around three pages long yourself. This is how we the people of the United States can rob these people of their most desired goal, your terror.

SFC Red Thomas (Ret), Armor Master Gunner, Mesa, AZ
From some other forums which i frequent - Anyone know whether thats absloute ballacks or not?

Personnally, i don't even know whether to ask or not... :roll:
 
#2
Well, for a start chemical agents are categorised as 'lethal, damaging and incapacitating', not 'nerve, blood, blister, and Incapacitating'. And I suspect it's the Marine Corps, not the Marine Coups. He's also lumped all chemical agents together and treated them as vapours, despite mentioning Blood agents specifically, the most obvious of which CO is a true gas and lighter than air.

His observation on the Tokyo underground sarin attacks are accurate, but don't take into account the comparatively small amounts of agent delivered. Sarin's also a first generation NA and by comparison fairly volatile. Thickened agents like the V-series present a long-term vapour hazard due to their low volatility and are genuine area-denial weapons. If they'd been used instead they could have shut down the underground for weeks at least, but delivery would have been a bitch.

His point about their use by terrorists not being quite the risk it's made out to be is well made, though, and quite accurate IMO.

Edited to dismount from my spelling high horse. Cheers TRSL.
 
#3
A few americanisms but nothing different to any UK CBRN training.
The author is just trying to allay peoples fears (You know how they over react over there)

Who knows... The septic probably worked at Porton Down.
 
#4
He talks a lot of sense, with the caveats of the points that Smart raised.

The best thing he gets over is that Chemical agents were designed and intended for area denial and not mass kill. Biological agents take time, the sort of instantly spreading disease/infection beloved of films etc just can't happen ..... not yet anyway. This is what Saddam spent his millions on; the attempt to 'weaponise' germs, viruses and bacteria.

His article gives some good advice, above all the bit about not panicking! Even baby nukes are survivable!
 

seaweed

LE
Book Reviewer
#5
In the 1950s I was taught the DISTRESS rule for detecting hostile chemical weapons. Apart from the last two being Hostile Smell and Hostile Smoke I've forgotten the rest. Any bids? Oh I think I was Irritation.

We used to be shown a gruesome (colour) film of what hapened to Oz convict volunteers in a piece of Queensland jungle impregnated with mustard gas. As the camera panned groins and armpits to show the resulting boils and lesions the bloke in the next seat fainted clean out (recovered though, just been to his golden wedding).
 
#7
Yeah - When World War Z happens it will be down to Chemical Agents - That darn pesky Umbrella Corporation IIRC.

I have my Sharpened Shovel Ready.
 
#8
Hmm, just reading it over again, and it appears that the nuclear weapon section is rather.. outdated..

Mainly, just looking at Trident, one of those beasties smacking into London "taaaawn" would vapourise everything within 2 square miles, and within 5 miles, 80% would be dead..

Mind you, perhaps hes trying to waylay fear, not cause it... :lol:

And agreed - following the yanks examples of stockpiling food, and weapons...

Hey, i think a good sized baseball bat does the trick, all right..? Except if you end up against some nasty fcuker like nemesis coming out of your arrse... Yes, i'm sad enough to have played the games as well....
 
#9
Far too serious and wordy for the NAAFI bar this...

If you don't like my work, don't nit pick, just sit down and explain chemical, nuclear, and biological warfare in a document around three pages long yourself. This is how we the people of the United States can rob these people of their most desired goal, your terror.
That is exceptionally sound. Exercises in the US suggested that for every real casualty from a biological agent, there would be something like sixteen more "worried well" clogging up the system - a system made much more fragile by the fact a lot of the medical staff had buggered off to Tahiti.

So yes, SFC Red Thomas, good on you for trying to waylay fears. But perhaps the best way to do it is to be honest about some of the less reassuring aspects as well. So tough, I'm going to nitpick.


Finally there's biological warfare. There's not much to cover here. Basic personal hygiene and sanitation will take you further than a million doctors.
I'd love to say that in my PhD viva. It would make life a lot easier. Perhaps there isn't much to cover as what Red completely misses is the key means of disseminating biological agents: aerosols. All this hygiene and good vector control is fine, in the aftermath of an attack, well away from where the agent was dispersed. But it won't make any difference if you had the misfortune to be in the area when an agent is disseminated.

Red's comments about standing water and rodent control speaks loudly of how the US perceived the threat as a reflection of its own offensive interests before 1972; insect borne viruses such as VEE, WEE and EEE, zoonotic bacteria such as Q fever; toxins such as staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Rather genteel as far as BW goes. Incapacitating rather than terminating, really. Spot of anthrax and plague for good measure as well.

One of the few public examples of the impact good sanitation, hygiene and cleanliness we have is the anthrax outbreak in Sverdlovsk in 1979. Firstly, the KGB rounded up dodgy meat sellers to try and cover up the existence of a BW factory in the city. The outbreak continued. Then they started scrubbing the streets with disinfectants. The outbreak worsened. Why? Vigorously cleaning the streets knocked the spores back into the air, and into the lungs of the cleaners. Oops.

I mentioned the agents above were fairly genteel. In Red Thomas's time, the fact that the Soviet Union were having fun with smallpox as a weapon would not have filtered down to his level, even if it were known at all. Smallpox's only vector is humans. And close contact is not a prerequisite. Quite a few cases in the 1970s (Meschede, Birmingham) where a teensy weensy bit of pox virus floated a long way and killed people dead. Containing an outbreak of smallpox in today's highly interconnected world is the mother of all public health headaches.

Of course, we have a half-decent vaccine for smallpox. Unless a strain was genetically engineered to be vaccine-resistant (not as sci-fi as I'd like, sadly), we could probably play catchup with its spread, and eradicate it again.

Technically, producing such a weapon would be fairly straightforward, the kind of thing you could do in an average university lab. The huge bottleneck though would be getting the smallpox strain in the first place. Officially, it only exists under strict guard in the US and Russia. Unofficially, feck knows.

As for what Saddam Hussein and co failed to achieve - they did achieve a fair bit. But here's one theory why they didn't do more. Incompetence. In my lab, there is an Iraqi scientist. He has the equivalent of a BSc and an MSc and allegedly some government lab experience as well before coming to the UK to do a PhD. He had no concept of what a thermometer is. Please don't interpret this observation as some kind of racist elitism, but one has to wonder how good the system was which allowed him to progress to this level without encountering something as basic as a thermometer during the four or five years he trained as a scientist.

Likewise, Aum Shinrykyo (sp.) with their sarin. I don't know the particulars of that attack, but not long before they had tried to spray anthrax all over Tokyo. Nobody got ill. Not because they did anything wrong. Months later, viable anthrax spores could be detected in the area. But Aum didn't know the strain they'd got hold of was completely harmless. Maybe if they could read "vaccine strain" on the bottle and got the right strain instead it would have been a very different story.


Red Thomas is obviously coming from the right place: being a drama llama helps no-one.

We're all going to die some day anyway. Whether it happens from a shock errection aged 97 in the retirement home, or choking to death on bloody vomit a few days after the first headache with blood dribbling out your bell end to go with bruised bollocks the size of oranges and your bloodied intestinal lining sloughing out your arrse doesn't change that. So why bother?
 
#10
Personnally, i'd have gone with the shock errection...

Far less messy. In theory...

Still, the extra info you've given is quite.. interesting.
 
#12
woody said:
Intresting article in British army review about cbrn if you can get hold of it .
The shock of the bit in bold will probably kill more people than the WMD would...
 

Latest Threads

Top