Which is right and proper as they are the 'owners' of that info. However AS has copies which he offered to share, but only if the Committee demand them, thus lifting the threat of contempt proceedings against AS by the Crown Office
AS was, I believe, suggesting that such notice be put to directly his lawyers rather than the PF's office, which has already recieved a request for the evidence and declined to provide it.
Were the Crown office to provide the evidence, that doesn't automatically eliminate the threat of contempt against AS. The court imposed injunction would need to be removed by that same court.