Your own timeline picture shows the Skripals driving from the direction of his home at 13:30118 said:Don't play coy. The story, up to that point, had been plod had no idea where they were.
Don't pretend that you knew any different at that point unless you're a bona fide psychic- which I doubt.
This conspiracy site places them having left home at approx that time:
We have the CCTV footage with the car passing at approx 13:30
CCTV has been released of ex-Russian spy Sergei Skripal driving into Salisbury with his daughter Yulia before they were found collapsed on a bench.
You forget me always asking you how sure you were about the 'never to return'?
.... which just happens to be a narrative pursued by Russia ...
Some of the points being raised by official Russian spokesmen are theories that have already been debunked.
All of these date to before the documentary which upset you so much
Have you worked out what Michael Mansfield representation for the family is yet?118 said:Dawn's parents don't seem too happy, what with the Coroner's Inquest being put off every opportunity it comes up.
No doubt their brief will be useful in the months to come.
Michael Mansfield is like a dog with a bone.
View attachment 484566
DAWN STURGESS is one of the real-life victims depicted in the BBC drama series The Salisbury Poisonings. But who was Dawn Sturgess?www.express.co.uk
As is well known, Charlie Rowley was a drug dealer.118 said:
Drug dealers stash the drugs that they are dealing in to minimise the chance of getting caught with everything. It remains irrelevant as the substance concerned was novichock, and inside a perfume bottle, not a drugs vial. (What drugs come in vials?)
.... and Tom Ricks turned out to be wrong.... Lets remember the difference between opinion, fact and evidence.
No. Dawn did not overdose.118 said:Lucky that Charlie's memory is not what it used to be and he's forgotten everything leading up to when Dawn OD'd.
As per evidence produced in court from her autopsy she did not have drugs in her bloodstream and did have novichcok in her bloodstream.
Dawn was an alcoholic in a relationship with a drug addict.
If you're so concerned about the family then stop making the false allegations about Dawn.
Hardly great evidence of anything there.118 said:Imagine if his memory suddenly came back.
Many, have you?
Right from the start honest Beeb was busy making the whole thing up.
Have a look at this thread. Nothing massively revelatory here just someone's recollection of what they saw outside Superdrug that day.
He though they looked drunk - matches with other witnesses
The Maltings were deserted - if he means there was nobody there, then he is mistaken
If he means there was hardly anyone there then that matches other witnesses and the scene shown
There was snow on the ground - if he means some traces, then he's possibly right that there could have been some patches on the grass. (Hardly the worst ommision). But if he remembers any significant amount of snow then his recollection is flawed.
We've seen the stills and video, I've photos taken by me with the levels of snow at the time (and have shown you them)
Compare his recollection to your CCTV ... The Maltings are neither deserted nor snowy: