New Isms

Discussion in 'The NAAFI Bar' started by BiscuitsAB, Aug 23, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. BiscuitsAB

    BiscuitsAB LE Moderator

    The Governemnt is surely scraping the barrel with this one. They are "concerned" about the DISCRIMINATION being shown to this group of people and consider it to rank with;

    homophobia: the fear of homo.

    racism: the fear that jonny forigner will forget his place.

    agism: well thats just revenge when your old folks are in the old folks
    and you refuse to pay the bill, because they didnt buy that
    action man tank when your were 7. its called pay back.

    anyhoo we must now not under any circumstance DISCRIMINATE against these members of our very diverse society.

    I Know my Rights, thats discrimination that is!

    Ladies and Gents and others. Wait and shoot!
     
  2. I believe selected rules should apply.

    Those above a C cup should be allowed to wander around naked freely.. Female ofcourse ;)
     
  3. What including Harriet Harman, are you mad or blind? :omfg: :puker:
     
  4. Boom! Boom!

    It's nice to have these things out in the open, as my good lady wife said the other night ...

    Please. No. "The Prime Minister will address the nation in the nib and reach out to members of all parties. Lord Mandelson will stand behind the PM and display his support, ably assisted by Black Rod."

    I remember the administration of gratuitous violence to people of non-heterosexual and/or East Asian origin being the vogue when I was growing up, but I don't remember the local nudist colony being so affected.

    ... I missed all the fun :evil:
     
  5. Wrong thread. Sorry.
     
  6. Harriet Harman is currently bidding for the Labour leadership by using her usual tactic of stirring up hatred towards men in order to capture the support of 'women' ...

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/rachel_sylvester/article6737832.ece

    And then, of course there is the anti-male Equality Bill, which is designed to be an ever-present reminder to women that men are always discriminating against them.

    And now, here's this ...

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1204359/In-week-Harriet-Harman-takes-charge-feminist-initiative.html


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1204359/In-week-Harriet-Harman-takes-charge-feminist-initiative.html#ixzz0P2V6QRPN


    And this ...

    Harman Demands Tougher Rape Laws

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6739430.ece

    Here she goes again, firing as many attacks on men as possible in order to enrage continuously women against men so that she can get their support - in this case, for the leadership.

    She has used this hateful tactic time and time again over the past 20 years.

    This is how Harriet Harman works ...

    She makes up some phoney or highly-exaggerated claims to suggest that millions of women are being 'abused' by men in some way; physical, sexual, emotional, financial etc etc.

    Indeed, she will do anything to keep this idea of, "men forever abusing women," in the headlines.

    By doing this, Harriet Harman inflames many millions of women into feeling antagonistic towards men. And then, of course, she gets their support for her own alleged endeavours in battling against these wicked men.

    She and her feminist friends have used this tactic for over 20 years. And it is a tactic that has worked very well indeed.

    And the men of this country just sit on their backsides, do nothing, and keep on letting her get away with it - while all her little communist poodle boys in the Labour party hide behind her skirt.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1204375/MAIL-COMMENT-Seven-days-feminist-fantasies.html

     
  7. Because this is NAAFI, the obvious response is "Make you mind up, woman, which is it to be?"

    Outside of NAAFI, I have some sympathy with the view, but in most cases it has to be coupled with a reduction in alcohol/drug usage. In addition, I am yet to be convinced that merely telling people not to do something will have a significant effect unless the reasons for doing it in the first place are addressed.