Nepal’s Gurkhas battle to stay in British military - Toronto Star

KATHMANDU, NEPAL—Deo Man Limbu sat in a veterans hall lined with pictures of old soldiers and reflected on his years of service, his battles and his dreams. The retired major with Britain’s legendary Gurkhas faced the Argentines in the 1982 Falklands War, when being a member of one of the world’s most-feared fighting forces had its advantages.

Well before hostilities started, British military planners encouraged photos of Gurkhas sharpening their fearsome curved knives — no one seemed to ask why you would bring a knife to a gunfight — and media stories about their fighting prowess.

The day before the final battle, loudspeakers warned the Argentines that the Gurkhas were coming. “We fired one or two shots and they all flew away,” said Limbu. “It was very effective.”

Other conflicts were not as easily won. Limbu tells of Gurkhas who were decorated in the First and Second World Wars, saw action in Borneo and died in Afghanistan in the 1980s, as well as in the last decade.
“We fought many enemies,” said Limbu, 60, who has the air of a dapper gentleman in a blue blazer, checked dress shirt and well-pressed brown pants. “But our politicians in Nepal are the worst.”

Today, the Gurkhas’ proud two-century tradition with the British army is under siege. Some in the communist-led Nepalese government object to the Gurkhas being hired guns for a former colonial power and are proposing to ban the practice, just as the British government makes deep cuts in its defence spending.
Britain’s connection with the Gurkhas dates to 1815 when, having barely defeated them in battle, the British decided that if you can’t beat them, have them join you. Since then, hundreds of thousands of Gurkhas have served under the Union Jack in peacetime and in war. For much of that history, Gurkhas did a lot of heavy lifting but earned less than British soldiers. After a headline-grabbing campaign in 2009, new rules gave Gurkhas serving after 1997 the same benefits, pay and pension as their British counterparts and the right to live in Britain. But those who served previously continue to receive a fraction of that, creating a two-tier system that has led to squabbling among Gurkhas.

Of course, even the lower pay is good by Nepalese standards: last year, more than 6,000 applicants competed for 176 positions.

Hopefuls aged 17 to 21 must do 70 sit-ups in two minutes and run uphill for 40 minutes carrying 32 kilograms of rocks to qualify. If they’re too old, some forge documents and dye their hair to mask their age, a little subterfuge that occasionally comes off in the rain. Others have been caught using steroids for endurance.
Gurkhas derive their name from the Nepali hill town of Gorkha. They’re blessed, according to legend, by the eighth-century Hindu warrior-saint Guru Gorakhnath, who gave them their famous knife, the kukri.

Gurkha loyalty, fighting skills and determination in the face of near-impossible odds are legendary. Former Indian Army Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw once famously said: “If a man says he is not afraid of dying, he is either lying or he is a Gurkha.”

But some Gurkhas say these glowing compliments mask a relationship based on condescension.
“The British like Gurkhas very much, until the Gurkhas cross the line and try to compete as equals,” said Deepak Bahadur Gurung, a pre-1997 soldier. “As long as you’re under them and you’re very loyal, they like you.”

British officers counter that pre-1997 Gurkhas knew the terms and pay when they signed up. “Given the understanding at the time, they’re looked after well,” said Col. Andrew Mills, defence attache at the British Embassy in Kathmandu, Nepal’s capital.

The Gurkhas have their share of myths, especially involving the evil-looking kukri. One holds that the 45-centimetre tapered blade can serve as a boomerang. According to another, it must taste blood once unsheathed, even if a Gurkha has to cut himself.

These stories sow fear, aiding in psychological warfare that worked against the Germans and Japanese during the Second World War and helped turn the tide in the Falklands, military experts say. Gurkhas are frequently called on to guard VIPs, given their reputation for loyalty after siding with Britain during the 1857 Indian Mutiny. During a year spent in Buckingham Palace protecting Queen Elizabeth II, Gurung attended 150 cocktail parties. Among the dignitaries he observed, then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was particularly impressive, he said. “She was as tough as a Gurkha.”

Although the pull is still strong, some military analysts are questioning the Gurkhas’ future. Britain will take just 126 this year and has seen 400 Gurkhas lose their jobs, reducing to 3,200 the number in active service, a tiny fraction of the 200,000 during the Second World War. “If you took them down much further, you’d risk ruining the mix,” said Chris Bellamy, a military historian and author of The Gurkhas: Special Force.

Recently, British officers and Gurkha veterans groups have emphasized the extent to which Britain and India contribute to Nepal’s economy — up to 25 per cent, by some accounts — through pensions and funding for Gurkha hospitals, schools in Gurkha communities and other welfare programs. (India employs more Gurkhas than Britain, although they’re not as well paid.)

“The government would have to think pretty long about turning that down,” Mills said. Such arguments, and the fact that 3 million other Nepalis work overseas because of the weak economy at home, appear to have silenced for now any move to block overseas Gurkha postings. But veterans groups fear the idea could resurface.

Some say the real reason the communists have floated the idea of a ban is because the former rebel fighters are jealous of Gurkha training, pay and professionalism. Chandra Prakash Gajurel, a politburo member with the Unified Communist Party of Nepal, says working for foreigners in effect makes Gurkhas mercenaries.

“Yes, Nepal has unemployment, but joining someone else’s army isn’t a good solution,” he said. “And, no, the Communist Party does not envy Gurkhas.”

As Limbu wrapped up a story about fighters squabbling over canned rations in the Falklands, he reflected on returning home after so many years abroad. “The problem with people like myself, we spend much of our life outside Nepal and when we return we don’t have the respect for things we once had,” he said. “If our government created jobs at home, we could talk about banning recruits from going overseas. But without making these preparations, they should stop talking about this idea.”

World News: Nepal
Heard about this a few weeks back, could be trouble ahead in Nepal when they realise what has been lost with the Chinese back communists in charge
I don't care as long as they stop coming to The Shot.
Get rid, I see no justification for them to be exempt from the current cuts other than Lumleys recent gobbing off, personally I think they are in general ******* shit and should have been binned years ago.
Agree 100pc. If we are going for cuts, then it makes sense to get rid of the "contractors" first.
Interesting article but some parts may backfire.

But some Gurkhas say these glowing compliments mask a relationship based on condescension.
“The British like Gurkhas very much, until the Gurkhas cross the line and try to compete as equals,” said Deepak Bahadur Gurung, a pre-1997 soldier. “As long as you’re under them and you’re very loyal, they like you.”
It's not an isolated sentiment;
Laxmi Sharma from the United British Ex-Gurkha Servicemen’s Association
He said: “The decision [on pensions] is appalling. Our service and duties to this country have been disregarded. We have been given a piece of bread you throw to a dog. Even dogs are given better treatment in this country.
"Dogs are treated better than Gurkhas"

If the public get the impression that there is a groundswell of resentment rising from the Gurkhas, whether it's justified or not, and start regarding them as serial whingers, the Gurkhas will only have themselves to blame.

Resentment can go back a long way and racial discrimination accusations, legal aid, and 'Human Rights lawyers' can be a potent mix. The High Court may have been a bluff though in order to get a settlemen in this instance:
By Robert Verkaik Saturday 18 July 2009
A former Gurkha who has spent 40 years fighting to clear his name after he was thrown out of the Army is to take his case for race discrimination to the High Court.

Maitalal Gurung, 60, has found documents which he says prove he was punished for daring to question the British Army's treatment of Nepalese soldiers in the 1960s. He wrote to his commanding officers, accusing the Army of racism.

Mr Gurung, who has moved from Nepal to Carmarthen in Wales to bring his case before a judge, said his dismissal stopped him working and ended his marriage. The law firm Howe and Co, which helped Gurkhas win the right to live in Britain, has agreed to support him. "I was upset by the way I and some of my colleagues were being treated," he said. "I was a bright student who had been approached by the British to join the Army when I was 14. I had been earmarked for officer training [at Sandhurst] ... but then they changed their minds without giving me any reason."

He wrote to his commanding officer setting out his grievances and then found himself being arrested and marched out of the Gurkhas training depot in Malaya. He was then escorted on a train to Singapore and flown to Nepal.

Mr Gurung was told he had simply been made redundant but he said he had found a letter stating he had been discharged for "disciplinary reasons".

He had been told that was a "mistake" and had been corrected. But Mr Gurung believes his case has been covered up.
Gurkha's 40 year's battle goes to the High Court
They're not the always grinning, loyal, paragons of military virtue, wee men the Brigade of Gurkha's British officers lead everyone to believe, their PR machine is superb, so good they believe their own hype.
They're generally one pint of rakshi and an imagined slight away from offing some of their officers.

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads