Musharraf warns UK over militancy

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by PartTimePongo, Jul 21, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4702609.stm

     
  2. Pakistan has always been a lawless cuntry. So many of its people are used to settling matters on their own account.
    Pakistan was 'mainly' the old North West Frontier region with little in the way of trade for the Old Empire and so was never really brought into the stream of mainland India.
    Western "agencies' trained up the local warlike race and now we are recieving their specilized attentions.
    john
     
  3. As odd as it might sound, I feel Pres Musharraf has made a valid point. It is well and good pointing the finger at Pakistan, when your own countries capital has the nom de pleum of 'Londanistan' with western intelligence agencies, due to the insanely lax immigration controls of this government.

    And before anyone starts of on how it is all the fault of the EU, think again! How I would like that to be the case. Unfortunately, our politicians are either more liberal, stupid or PC (take your pick) than French politicians, as we are accepting muslim radical clerics they are refusing entry to. Plainly then, the government cannot point the finger EUwards.

    Doubtless old Teflon Tone will wanting all this to die a quick, not to mention quiet, death. If only the press weren't so compliant. It would not greatly surprise me to find the press ranting on how Pakistan should sort their own affairs before attending to us etc, instead of actually pointing out the truth of the immigration situation. Hopefully the government and parliament will now attend to this matter with all possible speed.

    That said, it would not greatly surprise me if Liberty, or some other bunch of leftie tw@ts blocked it in the High Courts. Who said you can't beat democracy? Dunno, but they were bloody wrong! The courts beat democracy almost every day of the week!
     
  4. Musharraf says problem is in Britain, not in Pakistan

    Washington, July 22 (PTI) Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf has said that there was "no credible intelligence" tying the London bombers to his country and asked Britain to put its house in order before blaming others.

    Seeking to turn the tables on Britain in the wake of Prime Minister Tony Blair's criticism that Pakistan was not doing enough to tackle terrorism, he said there was no need to blame Islamabad as the problem was not there but in England.

    "The problem is not in Pakistan but in England. Let that be clear. They (London bombers) belong to an extremist organisation which has not been banned (in Britain). The hatred has been spread in London and nobody has moved against them. So why are they blaming Pakistan," he asked.

    There was "no credible intelligence" linking the bombers to Pakistan, despite reports that three of the four had spent time there, he told ABC television in an interview.

    Asked whether he knew what the bombers were doing in Pakistan, he said "we don't but we are going to investigate. Of course they came on British passports, and these people belong, unfortunately, to extremist organisations based in London itself." Lashing out at Britain, he said England had been slow to react to growing extremism within their own borders, including not acting upon a fatwah.

    "What did England do about this (the fatwah). Have they banned these organisations? Have they arrested the person who has done that? No, nothing. In the name of human rights, in the name of liberty, human liberty, freedom of speech, this is going on... Please set your own house in order. Everyone has to do something," Musharraf said.
     
  5. He has a point!
     
  6. There are several extremist organisations banned in Pakistan which are allowed to operate freely in the UK e.g Hizb-u-Tahir, Al-Mahajaroun. I believe one of these organisations issued a fatwah for Musharaff's assasination, which is what he is referring to in this quote. Also worth noting that many criminals, terrorists and general good for nothings in the Islamic world have been given sanctuary in the UK. Altaf Hussain of MQM, responsible for hundreds of terrorist killings in Karachi, is living happily in London. If the British Govt. is serious about fighting terror, it needs to start doing something about this double standard.
     
  7. fix bayonets! extended line start in scotland and work in a southerly direction!
     
  8. Saudi also complained about religious extremism in Britain.
    Yes, you know Saudi Arabia the country where women aren't allowed to drive for religious reasons!
     
  9. Currently in post-pub/through the looking glass/dream-like sort of state where the Pakistanis and Saudis are lecturing others on how to deal with human rights and religious extremism. How bizarre is that?

    I think I'd better go and sleep it off. It won't be like this in the morning surely...
     
  10. There's nothing bizarre about it. Britain has had its head in the sand over terrorism over the last few years. Extremists like Bakri have been allowed to incite hatred and violence. Extremist groups have been allowed to function freely. Britain has constantly refused to extradite terror suspects from throughout the Islamic world. Meanwhile British citizens have been carrying out terror attacks in Israel, Iraq and other parts of the world. And now London too. It's about time the British Govt. started doing something about the the scourge of British Islamist terrorism.
     
  11. I agree with most of the comments, especially Razorman's about BAKRI. This crazy PC government allowed him to receive a people carrier vehicle costing 28K from the taxpayers purse........and this bastard incites hatred every time he opens his mouth. Come on, now is the time to get rid of evil bastards like BAKRI and their siblings.
     
  12. while i do not agree with a lot Musharaf or Prince Turki (the Saudi Ambo to UK ) had to say, they both have valid points
    The UK gives asylum to these trouble makers and benfits and cars and disability benefits etc
    and then refuses to extridite them to their home countries as they are morally against sending some one "home to a death sentace" well they can turn a blind eye to Zimbabwe and a lot of other huge tragedies.... so why not send these mad mullahs home to a long walk out in the desert and then the world is a safer place
    to make a stand for freedom of speech the govt allows these venoumous filth to live here and bring all sorts of trouble on to a valued and respected part of the british population
     
  13. I understand that part of the Saudi government (read Royal family) wants to stage something like a "revolution from above" and to modernise the country, especially with the urban population in view , but they are forced to walk a tightrope as not to alienate the very feudalistic traditional rural tribal chiefs, who prefer to go back to the olde ways, where they had the absolute power.
    This is also not helped by reactionaries within the royal family, who are waiting for their time to take over.

    Jan
     
  14. Wasn't Britain allowing these groups haven here part of the "Covenant of Safety" whereby we allowed them here providing they did not cause any problems in this country?

    It seems that according to a poll fpr the Telegraph that six percent of Muslims believe that the bombers were right in what they did. Not a large percentage until that is put into numbers = 100,000 people.

    So much for not causing trouble here.
     
  15. 6% of those polled. Not 6% of the population I presume?