Mr.Blairs policy during the crisis with captured was... ?

Mr.Blair`s policy during the crisis with captured was...

  • Excellent

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Very good

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rather right

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Far from ideal but resultative

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rather wrong

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bad

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Absolutely wrong

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Not bad all things considered

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
#1
Personally I think it was at least not bad.
 
#3
Bravo2nothing said:
Need you ask?
I deliberately excluded an option: Blair is a c**t anyway.

Really the question is not so sensless as you suggest. There are also other questions:

- What would be right approach to resolve the crisis?
- What other British politicians (potential PM's) would do?
- What should be done to prevent similar cases in the future?
 
#5
USA doesn't look too impressed with how we handled it. From the beeb:

However, former US ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said President Ahmadinejad was the clear winner and had been strengthened in his pursuit of nuclear weapons.

"President Ahmadinejad comes out of this as a winner on two counts," he said.


"He won by seizing British hostages and he won by unilaterally deciding to release them, having found out the answer to the question I think he was posing, which is - how strong a response will Britain make to this act of taking captive these 15 service members?

"The reaction was - not much at all. I think Ahmadinejad is actually emboldened in his pursuit of nuclear weapons, and I think that means more trouble ahead for all of us."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6528235.stm

Very worrying to think we may have confirmed how weak we are.

TB
 
#6
The thing to remeber here is that the Iranians would only release the captives if they didn't appear to lose face.
Tony and his advisors have managed to give the Iranians an 'out' from this situation.
The result is the important factor here. The 15 are free, no one is dead. The rest is irrelevant.
 

Biped

LE
Book Reviewer
#7
Mr_Deputy said:
No one has mentioned Iran suddenly getting access to their prisoners in US care. Or is it just a coincidence that Iranian officials are expecting one to be released or has just been released (one captured in Iraq) and several are planning official visits to those previously denied visits. So my mate Radio 4 tells me.
I think you are just being rather cynical. If that was the case, every time the Iranians wanted to get something, they'd grab some hostages, do a deal and the 'magnanimously' release them.

I think it's just coincidental that just before the prisoners are released, various communiques (the contents of which are kept secret) are sent back and forth, whilst at the same time, bilateral talks are agreed AND the Iranians get to see their terrorists in American hands.
 
#8
From my point of view few (maybe insignificant) mistakes have been done.

The declaration that the Brits were captured in Iraqi waters was rather a mistake. So mr.Blair in fact suggested that if it would be established that the Brits were captured in Iranian waters then it would be right to arrest then, detain for a long period.

If I were mr.Blair then I would propose this explanation.

HMS Cornwall was not in Iranian waters, the merchant ship searched by British crew was not in Iranian waters too. On their way to HMS Cornwall, British boats could indeliberately and insignificantly enter Iranian waters due navigational mistake, weather conditions, turbulent waters and so on. According to our data it hasn't happened but anyway there exist a right for innocent passage through territorial waters. So anyway British servicemen and woman must be released.

Map presented by the MoD is also a mistake. The water border between Iran and Iraq in Persian Gulf simply doesn't exist. There is no agreement about it. So in fact the UK officially supported Iraq in the dispute around the border. At least on this stage it is a wrong decision.
 
#9
I'd like to know what Blair's policy actually was. Seemed to me that he and the ghastly Beckett were being entirely driven by events. It was the Iranian's decision to release, and it could have gone on until they tired of the situation.

What is clear is that we have very few allies in Europe, or anywhere else, for that matter.

I wonder why that might be. Maybe it's an indicator of British Diplomatic abilities...

Of course now everyone will be claiming kudos for the release. However, I'd like to see a proper investigation into the exact circumstances of both the Naval and Political actions.
 
#10
Unsworth said:
I'd like to know what Blair's policy actually was. Seemed to me that he and the ghastly Beckett were being entirely driven by events. It was the Iranian's decision to release, and it could have gone on until they tired of the situation.

What is clear is that we have very few allies in Europe, or anywhere else, for that matter.

I wonder why that might be. Maybe it's an indicator of British Diplomatic abilities...

Of course now everyone will be claiming kudos for the release. However, I'd like to see a proper investigation into the exact circumstances of both the Naval and Political actions.
Or maybe it's the fact that we've handed over control of our foreign policy to a shaved chimp in a suit?
 
#11
Unsworth I agree, BLiar did not appear to be driving events, rather they were passengers. As for Europe we have few allies and given that periodicaly we hear whispers of a euro army I find that odd.
On the whole I think he was lucky that Iran did not keep them. I was glad to see the TLAMS were not flying around as many Americans suggested was best.
 

Alsacien

MIA
Moderator
#12
Neuroleptic said:
Unsworth said:
I'd like to know what Blair's policy actually was. Seemed to me that he and the ghastly Beckett were being entirely driven by events. It was the Iranian's decision to release, and it could have gone on until they tired of the situation.

What is clear is that we have very few allies in Europe, or anywhere else, for that matter.

I wonder why that might be. Maybe it's an indicator of British Diplomatic abilities...

Of course now everyone will be claiming kudos for the release. However, I'd like to see a proper investigation into the exact circumstances of both the Naval and Political actions.


Or maybe it's the fact that we've handed over control of our foreign policy to a shaved chimp in a suit?
Or maybe its the fact that none of us has any idea which parties were lobbying who in the background to this whole sorry affair.

I suspect quite a few "influences" were brought to bear in the last few weeks.....
 
#13
Far too early to give a considered answer.

HMG, on Blair's watch, got the result we all wanted, and thank God for that.

What the wider effects of his government's stance will be remains to be seen.

So, in light of current info., a plaudit for Blair's govt. And his remarks today, as the 15 landed at LHR just hours after 4 soldiers and an interpreter lost their lives in Basra, were entirely appropriate.
 
#14
TopBadger said:
USA doesn't look too impressed with how we handled it. From the beeb:

However, former US ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said President Ahmadinejad was the clear winner and had been strengthened in his pursuit of nuclear weapons.

"President Ahmadinejad comes out of this as a winner on two counts," he said.


"He won by seizing British hostages and he won by unilaterally deciding to release them, having found out the answer to the question I think he was posing, which is - how strong a response will Britain make to this act of taking captive these 15 service members?

"The reaction was - not much at all. I think Ahmadinejad is actually emboldened in his pursuit of nuclear weapons, and I think that means more trouble ahead for all of us."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6528235.stm

Very worrying to think we may have confirmed how weak we are.

TB
Some very entertaining stuff in this thread and some of the others - there is a good link on the other thread to some international press (Indian) who have zero sympathy for our position and TB's handling.

Policy outcomes ? The strengthening of Ahmadinejad internationally and domestically (his perception at any rate), and a visibly, weakened UK, are just two of the outcomes of this fiasco. And that is before the tornado of recrimination and blame erupts all over our screens in the coming days/weeks. As a 2nd order effect, domestic turmoil and disharmony, this on its own was was well worth the Iranian outlay.

Boy have we underestimated Ahmadinejad, which again is something a couple of the posts reflect on. His timing and sense of theatre are outstanding - on the 25th anniversary of the Falklands (cue much soul searching), he hijacks British sailors, releases them as an Easter present, and has the neck to tell the Iranian people he will be asking TB not to try the crew for their "crime" when they return to the UK !!?!!?!? Inspired is not the world, but it certainly suggests an understanding of how we work many orders of magnitude better than we understand them.
 
#15
Temujin said:
TopBadger said:
USA doesn't look too impressed with how we handled it. From the beeb:

However, former US ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said President Ahmadinejad was the clear winner and had been strengthened in his pursuit of nuclear weapons.

"President Ahmadinejad comes out of this as a winner on two counts," he said.


"He won by seizing British hostages and he won by unilaterally deciding to release them, having found out the answer to the question I think he was posing, which is - how strong a response will Britain make to this act of taking captive these 15 service members?

"The reaction was - not much at all. I think Ahmadinejad is actually emboldened in his pursuit of nuclear weapons, and I think that means more trouble ahead for all of us."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6528235.stm

Very worrying to think we may have confirmed how weak we are.

TB
Some very entertaining stuff in this thread and some of the others - there is a good link on the other thread to some international press (Indian) who have zero sympathy for our position and TB's handling.

Policy outcomes ? The strengthening of Ahmadinejad internationally and domestically (his perception at any rate), and a visibly, weakened UK, are just two of the outcomes of this fiasco. And that is before the tornado of recrimination and blame erupts all over our screens in the coming days/weeks. As a 2nd order effect, domestic turmoil and disharmony, this on its own was was well worth the Iranian outlay.

Boy have we underestimated Ahmadinejad, which again is something a couple of the posts reflect on. His timing and sense of theatre are outstanding - on the 25th anniversary of the Falklands (cue much soul searching), he hijacks British sailors, releases them as an Easter present, and has the neck to tell the Iranian people he will be asking TB not to try the crew for their "crime" when they return to the UK !!?!!?!? Inspired is not the world, but it certainly suggests an understanding of how we work many orders of magnitude better than we understand them.
Firstly the USA may have some comentators who say we handled it badly, but they are home and well, from a country that thinks justice is hanging raped women for having sex outside marriage is OK.

Now why did Imadinnerjacket (who seems perhaps to have been on of the leaders in the US Embassy hostage fiasco) let our guys go, with no appology from Tone. He may be a master of the stage managed show, but he depnds very much on countries like France and Russia who were not that happy about the capture and may well have done some private leaning on the Iranians. It is clear a lot happened behind closed doors over the past few days to make Dinnerjacket suddenly cave in how ever he dressed it up, he caved in.
 
#16
Temujin said:
...
Boy have we underestimated Ahmadinejad, which again is something a couple of the posts reflect on. His timing and sense of theatre are outstanding - on the 25th anniversary of the Falklands (cue much soul searching), he hijacks British sailors, releases them as an Easter present, and has the neck to tell the Iranian people he will be asking TB not to try the crew for their "crime" when they return to the UK !!?!!?!? Inspired is not the world, but it certainly suggests an understanding of how we work many orders of magnitude better than we understand them.
I think the effectiveness of his gambit is only just sinking in. The Iranians have a state PR machine that Bliar would be proud of.

As a sign of goodwill I trust that our PM will be inviting President Ahmadinejad to either Downing Street or Chequers whilst he still has the chance to host such a visit.
 
#17
maxi_77 said:
Temujin said:
TopBadger said:
USA doesn't look too impressed with how we handled it. From the beeb:

However, former US ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said President Ahmadinejad was the clear winner and had been strengthened in his pursuit of nuclear weapons.

"President Ahmadinejad comes out of this as a winner on two counts," he said.


"He won by seizing British hostages and he won by unilaterally deciding to release them, having found out the answer to the question I think he was posing, which is - how strong a response will Britain make to this act of taking captive these 15 service members?

"The reaction was - not much at all. I think Ahmadinejad is actually emboldened in his pursuit of nuclear weapons, and I think that means more trouble ahead for all of us."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6528235.stm

Very worrying to think we may have confirmed how weak we are.

TB
Some very entertaining stuff in this thread and some of the others - there is a good link on the other thread to some international press (Indian) who have zero sympathy for our position and TB's handling.

Policy outcomes ? The strengthening of Ahmadinejad internationally and domestically (his perception at any rate), and a visibly, weakened UK, are just two of the outcomes of this fiasco. And that is before the tornado of recrimination and blame erupts all over our screens in the coming days/weeks. As a 2nd order effect, domestic turmoil and disharmony, this on its own was was well worth the Iranian outlay.

Boy have we underestimated Ahmadinejad, which again is something a couple of the posts reflect on. His timing and sense of theatre are outstanding - on the 25th anniversary of the Falklands (cue much soul searching), he hijacks British sailors, releases them as an Easter present, and has the neck to tell the Iranian people he will be asking TB not to try the crew for their "crime" when they return to the UK !!?!!?!? Inspired is not the world, but it certainly suggests an understanding of how we work many orders of magnitude better than we understand them.
Firstly the USA may have some comentators who say we handled it badly, but they are home and well, from a country that thinks justice is hanging raped women for having sex outside marriage is OK.

Now why did Imadinnerjacket (who seems perhaps to have been on of the leaders in the US Embassy hostage fiasco) let our guys go, with no appology from Tone. He may be a master of the stage managed show, but he depnds very much on countries like France and Russia who were not that happy about the capture and may well have done some private leaning on the Iranians. It is clear a lot happened behind closed doors over the past few days to make Dinnerjacket suddenly cave in how ever he dressed it up, he caved in.
He did cave in. His little bits of theatre don't succeeding in masking or altering that. Don't let's confuse his style with his substance, which has been badly shaken. He will be rueing the day he let this happen - if, indeed, he and his govt. were in any kind of direct chain of command with those who lifted the 15.

This outcome could well play in the Allies' favour.
 
#19
milsum said:
Oh, are we allowed to talk about it now? :? :roll:
Do You wonder why we are now allowed to talk about it. Could it be that there is no chance now that we can endanger our comrades by some injudicious comment?
 
#20
Are you familiar with sarcasm Sven? Don't mistake me for a troglodyte.

Injudicious? Talk sense man. Do you think anything about this affair was in any way just?

Thank God people gave their lives so that we can live in a free country without fear of persecution for speaking our piece. I wish such forums were ubiquitous, but apparently they're not, my dear Comrade.

Edited to add, know any journalists in Russia Sven?
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top