Pah, who needs carrier training ?
I have a soft spot for flying boats (possibly owing to one of my relatives having worked for Short in the 1930s), the demise of which from the field still surprises me.
British designs apart, one that was cancelled on a government whim (though I beieve somebody in the US Navy was shitting bricks that it would make most of their inventory obselete overnight) was the Martin P6(M), the orginal XP prototypes being the sleekest. Had the proposed ramjets been functional (there was talk of the second generation being fitted with atomic powerplants) it would have been the only transonic flhying boat in existence, the size of the B52, twice as fast and able to take off/land on 90% of the planet (with its own beach cradle). Refuelling at sea would have been by submarine but again the Navy claimed it was unfeasible, another deliberate block on the design perhaps.
A civilan version (307 Seamistress) would have had eight engines, four in the two overhead pods.
View attachment 674369View attachment 674370