More trouble in Luton

#1
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
 
#2
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
those idiots speak for the army in the same way that that other bunch of idiots speak for most muslims in this country.
 
#3
BiscuitsAB said:
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
those idiots speak for the army in the same way that that other bunch of idiots speak for most muslims in this country.
I say we let them kick f*ck into each other and be done with it.
 
#4
DeltaDog said:
I say we let them kick f*ck into each other and be done with it.
Sky is missing a fantastic pay-per-view opportunity here.
 
T

trowel

Guest
#5
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
"Low-life scum, nutters, gormless pillocks, thugs". Which side are you on?
 
T

trowel

Guest
#6
trowel said:
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
"Low-life scum, nutters, gormless pillocks, thugs". Which side are you on?
If it all kicks off, and I for one hope it doesn't, I want those lads on my side. They were doing what most of the country wants to do, but hasn't yet got the nerve to do.
 
#8
trowel said:
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
"Low-life scum, nutters, gormless pillocks, thugs". Which side are you on?
What fcuking side, you prick?
 
T

trowel

Guest
#10
the_guru said:
trowel said:
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
"Low-life scum, nutters, gormless pillocks, thugs". Which side are you on?
What fcuking side, you prick?
That's it . get the abuse in before pausing to think.
 
#11
No place like home! Trouble makers will use any excuse to cause some bother, and hopefully people will realise that they are not representing the Forces at all. I don't want to be associated with them.
 
#12
trowel said:
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
"Low-life scum, nutters, gormless pillocks, thugs". Which side are you on?
Fcuknuts, I'm serving TA and ex-reg. What side do you think I'm on? I, and my colleagues, don't need these criminal arrsewipes thinking that they can speak for me. I'm quite capable of holding my own in any sensible lucid discussion. What those morons did was nothing like that and we need to distance ourselves from that sort of 'brown-shirt' style lunacy.
 
#13
trowel said:
trowel said:
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
"Low-life scum, nutters, gormless pillocks, thugs". Which side are you on?
If it all kicks off, and I for one hope it doesn't, I want those lads on my side. They were doing what most of the country wants to do, but hasn't yet got the nerve to do.
Really? So why haven't the good people of Luton already set about this?

Perhaps because they knew a good dose of ignoring the ignorant works wonders?

Still, these gormless c*cks have given the ignorant the publicity they craved didn't they.
 
#14
trowel said:
trowel said:
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
"Low-life scum, nutters, gormless pillocks, thugs". Which side are you on?
If it all kicks off, and I for one hope it doesn't, I want those lads on my side. They were doing what most of the country wants to do, but hasn't yet got the nerve to do.
trowel said:
That's it . get the abuse in before pausing to think.
I've thought... You're still a fcuknut trying to defend the undefensible.
 
#16
MikeMcc said:
There was more trouble in Luton yesterday. A bunch of low-life scum seem to think that they can speak for the Armed Forces. The nutters with the signs protesting against the Anglians may have been misguided and vocal but they were relatively few in number and harmless. The gormless pillocks that caused the mayhem yesterday were far more threatening, they were thugs and I freel the need to make it public that they certainly don't represent me.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/8066515.stm
Good article on it here - mainly taking a shot at The Mail's reporting.

http://enemiesofreason.blogspot.com/

I did a google of Wayne King, the organiser of "United People of Luton". The first hit was White Reference, which describes itself thusly:

White Reference is designed for the dissemination of news of interest to the White Nationalist community as well as others interested in such information. This includes reports of crime and oppression against White people worldwide, as well as accounts of White resistance.

http://whitereference.blogspot.com/2009/05/united-people-of-luton-stages-protest.html
 
#17
Ashie, dont you mean that the No10 smear unit did the research on the loonies that caused the trouble in Luton, and passed it onto you to spin your shite here?
 
#18
This is exactly what happens when the Police do nothing against the Islamist nutters, people decide to take the law into their own hands.

Whilst I applaud the arrests of nutters, I note that other nutters from the religion of peace haven't been arrested. So much for impartial policing.

Mind you, if being a nutter was a crime, Ashie would be looking at a life sentence withour remission.
 
#19
bobthedog said:
Ashie, dont you mean that the No10 smear unit did the research on the loonies that caused the trouble in Luton, and passed it onto you to spin your shite here?
bobthestalker. Good evening. I suppose you thought those chaps in Luton were, if anything, a little moderate for your taste.

A little tip: googling doesn't take a lot of "research". You should try it some time.
 
#20
The_Coming_Man said:
This is exactly what happens when the Police do nothing against the Islamist nutters, people decide to take the law into their own hands.

Whilst I applaud the arrests of nutters, I note that other nutters from the religion of peace haven't been arrested. So much for impartial policing.

Mind you, if being a nutter was a crime, Ashie would be looking at a life sentence withour remission.
That's the official BNP view is it?
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads