More Of Our Heritage Under Threat

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by Chodmeister, Jul 12, 2015.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Aparteid means seperate development the idea was to bring everyone up to the same point of education.
    What a pity that the idea didn`t include the "Yaarpies"
     
  2. isn`t `positive discrimination`.............`apartheid`?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. HSF

    HSF LE

    bomb the barstards
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. sirbhp

    sirbhp LE Book Reviewer

    when i saw Joan of arcs ring i was disappointed with the pictures , not at all what i was expecting .
     
    • Funny Funny x 6
  5. I heard she had a hot ass.
     
  6. A response to the BLM and statue removal issue that last of which has been the move to remove Nelson. This one to do with Rhodes’s statue in Oxford

    Political Correctness - views of a group of dons at Oxford University

    A foolish attempt to re-write history according to contemporary views and prejudice.

    This letter (author or authors' identity concealed) is in response to the campaign by Black students attending Oxford University as 'Rhodes Scholars' to remove the statue of Oxford Benefactor, Cecil Rhodes. It should be read on every campus in the USA and elsewhere in the western world.

    To whom it may concern among the cohort of Rhodes Scholars at Oxford University


    Cecil Rhodes’s generous bequest has contributed greatly to the comfort and well being of many generations of Oxford students – a good many of them, dare we say it, better, brighter and more deserving than you.

    This doesn't mean we approve of everything Rhodes did in his lifetime – but then we don’t have to. Cecil Rhodes died over a century ago. Autres temps, autres moeures.* If you don’t understand what this means – and it would not remotely surprise us if that were the case – then we really think you should ask yourself the question: “Why am I at Oxford?”

    Oxford, let us remind you, is the world’s second oldest extant university. Scholars have been studying here since at least the 11th century. Oxford has played a major part in the development of Western civilisation from the 12th century's intellectual renaissance through the Enlightenment and beyond. Our alumni include William of Ockham, Roger Bacon, William Tyndale, John Donne, Sir Walter Raleigh, Erasmus, Sir Christopher Wren, William Penn, Adam Smith, Samuel Johnson, Robert Hooke, William Morris, Oscar Wilde, Emily Davison, Cardinal Newman, Julie Cocks and Margaret Thatcher. We’re a big deal. And most of the people privileged to come and study here are conscious of what a big deal we are. Oxford is their alma mater – their dear mother – and they respect and revere her accordingly.

    And what were your ancestors doing during that period? Living in mud huts, mainly. Sure we’ll concede you the short-lived Southern African civilisation of Great Zimbabwe. But let’s be brutally honest here. The contribution of the Bantu tribes to modern civilisation has been as near as damn it to zilch.

    You’ll probably say that’s “racist”. But it’s what we here at Oxford prefer to call “true.” Perhaps the rules are different at other universities. In fact, we know things are different at other universities. We’ve watched with horror at what has been happening across the pond from the University of Missouri to the University of Virginia and even to revered institutions like Harvard and Yale: the “safe spaces”; the‪#‎blacklivesmatter; the creeping cultural relativism; the stifling political correctness; what Allan Bloom rightly called “the closing of the American mind”. At Oxford however, we will always prefer facts and free, open debate to petty grievance-mongering, identity politics and empty sloganeering. The day we cease to do so is the day we lose the right to call ourselves the world’s greatest university.

    Of course, you are perfectly within your rights to squander your time at Oxford on silly, vexatious, single-issue political campaigns. Though it does make us wonder how stringent the vetting procedure is these days for Rhodes scholarships and even more so, for Mandela Rhodes scholarships. We are well used to seeing undergraduates – or, in your case postgraduates - making idiots of themselves. Just don’t expect us to indulge your idiocy, let alone genuflect before it. You may be black – “BME” as the grisly modern terminology has it – but we are colour blind.

    We have been educating gifted undergraduates from our former colonies, our Empire, our Commonwealth and beyond for many generations. We do not discriminate over sex, race, colour or creed. We do, however, discriminate according to intellect.

    That means, inter alia, that when our undergrads or post grads come up with fatuous ideas, we don’t pat them on the back, give them a red rosette and say: “Ooh, you’re black and you come from South Africa. What a clever chap you are!” No. We prefer to see the quality of those ideas tested in the crucible of public debate. That’s another key part of the Oxford intellectual tradition you see: you can argue any damn thing you like but you need to be able to justify it with facts and logic – otherwise your idea is worthless.

    Your notion that a bronze statue of Cecil Rhodes should be removed from Oriel College because it’s symbolic of “institutional racism” and “white slavery” is utterly ludicrous. Even if there's a shred of validity in your case – which we dispute – so bloody what? Any student so feeble-minded that he or she can’t pass a bronze statue without having their “safe space” violated really doesn't deserve to be here at all. And besides, if we were to remove Rhodes’s statue on the premise that his life wasn’t blemish-free, where would we stop? As one of our alumni Dan Hannan has pointed out, Oriel’s other benefactors include two English kings so awful – Edward II and Charles I – that their subjects had them killed. The college opposite to Oriel – ChristChurch – was built by a murderous, thieving bully who bumped off two of his wives. Thomas Jefferson kept slaves: does that invalidate the US Constitution? Winston Churchill had unenlightened views about Muslims and India: was he then the wrong man to lead Britain in the war?”

    Actually, we’ll go further than that. Your absurd 'Rhodes Must Fall' campaign is not merely fatuous but ugly, vandalistic and dangerous. We agree with Oxford historian RW Johnson that what you are trying to do here is no different from what ISIS and Al-Qaeda have been doing to artefacts in places like Mali and Syria. You are seeking to murder history.

    And who are you, anyway, to be lecturing Oxford University on how it should order its affairs? Your 'Rhodes Must Fall' campaign, we understand, originates in South Africa and was initiated by a black activist who told one of his lecturers “whites have to be killed”. One of you – Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh – is the privileged son of a rich politician and a member of a party whose slogan is “Kill the Boer; Kill the Farmer”; another of you, Ntokozo Qwabe, who is only in Oxford as a beneficiary of a Rhodes scholarship, has boasted about the need for “socially conscious black students” to “dominate white universities, and do so ruthlessly and decisively!"

    Great. That’s just what Oxford University needs. Some cultural enrichment from the land of Winnie Mandela, burning tyre necklaces, an AIDS epidemic (almost entirely the result of government indifference and ignorance) one of the world’s highest per capita murder rates, institutionalised corruption, tribal politics, anti-white racism and a collapsing economy. Please name which of the above items you think will enhance the lives of the 22,000 students studying here at Oxford.

    And then please explain what it is that makes your attention-grabbing campaign to remove a listed statue from an Oxford college more urgent, more deserving than the desire of probably at least 20,000 of those 22,000 students to enjoy their time here unencumbered by the irritation of spoilt, ungrateful little tossers, on scholarships they clearly don’t merit, using racial politics and cheap guilt-tripping to ruin the life and fabric of our beloved university.

    Understand this clearly: you have everything to learn from us ... we have nothing to learn from you.

    Yours,

    Oriel College, Oxford

    *Autres temps, autres moeurs – Other times, other customs: in other eras, people behaved differently.

    Chris Patten (Lord Patten of Barnes), The Chancellor of Oxford University, commented on the Today Programme on BBC Radio 4 "Education is not indoctrination. Our history is not a blank page on which we can write our own version of what it should have been according to our contemporary views and prejudices.” How true.
     
    • Like Like x 8