Discussion in 'Royal Air Force' started by sunnoficarus, Jun 20, 2011.
The heart of the site is the forum area, including:
Should have bought C-17's!
Airbus pulls 'Grizzly' out of Paris Air Show - Telegraph
Late, overweight, unreliable.....it seems to have been made just for the RAF!
it does have a ground attack capability though - according to tinman.
it is fcuking shambles as usual, why they dont get one company to come up with a working design and then farm the subcontracts out instead of this abortion is beyond me. it was supposed to be better and cheaper than the herc to escape US reliance but they would have been better just buying the license to built hercs.
and we allready know that it lacks the legs and speed of the c17 so why call the thing 'atlas' and its so expensive we will be leasing c130s every time they might have to go somewhere with aggressive organic ground fire or sending c17s anyway.
how they can justify this and yet cancel nimrod which was at least ready is beyond me.
Does showering the ground beneath you with engine parts and propeller blades really count as ground attack?
Ok, yes it does.
And hot boiling oils we've been doing that for a thousand years on and off!
We should still do that if you ask me. There's no defence against it, apart from one of those tiny comedy umbrellas.
Not to detract from the entirely fair points about the A400M and its woes, but the Torygraph strikes again:
Says the paper.
Berlin, ILA 2010: Scotch mist, presumably?
SoF, I am shocked... why suggest buying more C-17s when they are very large beasts... really we need some new hercy birds.
Goes without saying. New C-130's and more C-17's as per the RAF's personal wish.
A load of nice airliners designed for AAR (including themselves), and transport for long haul,
c-17s for strat lift
C-130s for tac lift
and a load of chinooks, ospreys and black hawks... job jobbed.
Shouldn't that be the other way around?
And of course I didn't take this photo at RIAT (RAF Fairford) in July 2010 either...
Well, who did take it then?
Just thought I'd add a quick sub-clause to that for you!
Separate names with a comma.