Moderation Kent Police issues

#1
As I understand it there is an order of a High Court Judge from 1998 that prohibits naming or otherwise identifying a man whose name emerged in evidence at the Mortlock v Maison libel trial Aldwych High Court.

My guess is that the High Court Judge made the order so as to protect fairness of criminal inquiries he felt would inevitably ensue, by Kent Police, from the libel case.

Amongst crime complaints refused by Kent Police (referred to on another current thread) were the crime complaints arising from that High Court case.

Hence with regard to the murder of 6th Thanet Gun range member Ken Speakman (a retd MI5 officer) 1996; with regard to HM Coroner requests circa 97 to Kent Police to re-examine the death (suicide verdict) of Georgina Maison 1978 (A request refused by Kent Police) and with regard to police attempts to intimidate complainants about 6th Thanet Gun range and the associated issues there is a rock and a hard place.

To tell a fuller story would mean breaching a High Court Order.

What I will say is that if the full story emerges it would probably make the Huhne history look trivial by comparison.

Of course it would require that Baroness Scotland declare whether or not she was aware of the High Court order when she claimed Chief constable Fuller for CPS and got him out of Police. It would require that Senior Law Lord (I think his name is Phiilips of Maltravers) make a similar clarification.

It would require a clarification from Roger Gale MP.

But that is why I take care. What's the point of a rule of law unless you respect it.
 

Wordsmith

LE
Book Reviewer
#2
obsessive [əbˈsɛsɪv]adj

1. (Psychiatry) Psychiatry motivated by a persistent overriding idea or impulse, often associated with anxiety and mental illness
2. continually preoccupied with a particular activity, person, or thing

n1. (Psychiatry) Psychiatry a person subject to obsession
2. a person who is continually preoccupied with a particular activity, person, or thing

obsessively adv

obsessiveness n
Wordsmith
 

jarrod248

LE
Gallery Guru
#4
As I understand it there is an order of a High Court Judge from 1998 that prohibits naming or otherwise identifying a man whose name emerged in evidence at the Mortlock v Maison libel trial Aldwych High Court.

My guess is that the High Court Judge made the order so as to protect fairness of criminal inquiries he felt would inevitably ensue, by Kent Police, from the libel case.

Amongst crime complaints refused by Kent Police (referred to on another current thread) were the crime complaints arising from that High Court case.

Hence with regard to the murder of 6th Thanet Gun range member Ken Speakman (a retd MI5 officer) 1996; with regard to HM Coroner requests circa 97 to Kent Police to re-examine the death (suicide verdict) of Georgina Maison 1978 (A request refused by Kent Police) and with regard to police attempts to intimidate complainants about 6th Thanet Gun range and the associated issues there is a rock and a hard place.

To tell a fuller story would mean breaching a High Court Order.

What I will say is that if the full story emerges it would probably make the Huhne history look trivial by comparison.

Of course it would require that Baroness Scotland declare whether or not she was aware of the High Court order when she claimed Chief constable Fuller for CPS and got him out of Police. It would require that Senior Law Lord (I think his name is Phiilips of Maltravers) make a similar clarification.

It would require a clarification from Roger Gale MP.

But that is why I take care. What's the point of a rule of law unless you respect it.
Hmm bacon and mushrooms for breakfast I reckon.
 

Joker62

ADC
Book Reviewer
#6
Fuck me, Bounce, you really are a cancerous polyp on the anus of humanity!
 
#11
i must admit that when i first saw the thread i thought "thank fuck-good CO-bad CO and the other mods had finally had enough of this dribbling knobhead and had decided to moderate him onto a forum of his own where we didnt have to be terminally bored to death with his one man campaign against law and order in kent " but hey ho-not to be !! Toast with that jarrod ?
 
#12
I must have missed the start of this story. It sounds fascinating.

Run us through it again from the start BB, there's a good chap!
 
#14
Are there any flying saucers or men in black involved? I'm on the edge of my seat here. Can't* wait for the next thrilling instalment.




* Can.
 
Z

Zarathustra

Guest
#19
Bounce, I strongly suggest that it is high time you climb onto a bridge and contemplate your life and the choices you've made.
 
#20
BB - I'd love to hear more. Can you post a 20,000 word summary which I shall read on my return. Ignore these other posters mate so, in your own time, go on...........Full story.
 

Top