Ministry of Defence: Major Projects Report 2008

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by Blogg, May 19, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Somewhat lost in all the noise about Gorbals Mick, the Public Accounts C'tee is not painting a rosy picture:

    "In the last year, the 20 biggest projects suffered a further £205 million of cost increases, and 96 months additional slippage. This is the worst in-year slippage since 2003. The total forecast costs for these projects have now risen to nearly £28 billion, some 12% over budget.

    Total slippage stands at over 40 years, a 36% increase on approved timescales. The number of Key User Requirements reported as being "at risk" of not being met has also increased from 12 to 16 in the last year.

    This is a disappointing set of results, particularly because the problems are being caused by previously identified failures such as poor project management, a lack of realism, not identifying key dependencies and underestimating of costs and timescales. The reoccurrence of these problems suggests that the Department's latest acquisition reforms, introduced in 2001, are not yet resulting in the Department making better investment decisions or improving the execution of its defence projects.

    In particular, the main investment decisions for Terrier, Soothsayer and the Naval Extremely High Frequency/Super High Frequency Satellite Communications Terminals were made after 2001, yet these were the projects which suffered the largest slippages in 2007-08.

    Project delays also have a detrimental impact on operational capability and costs. The Terrier and Soothsayer In-Service Dates have already been missed, forcing the Department to buy interim vehicles and continue using equipment suffering from obsolescence in Afghanistan.

    An additional 3-4 year delay to the A400M aircraft means that either older Hercules aircraft will have to serve beyond their planned Out of Service Date, or other transport aircraft will have to be bought or leased to address a growing gap in capability. "



    "The Department introduced reforms in 2001 but these have not yet had an effect: the projects with the most severe slippages in 2007-08 were the very ones where the main investment decisions were taken after 2001.

    "The consequences of all of this for our service men and women are serious. Delays to projects have led to gaps in our present front-line capability. For example, the MOD has had to use in Afghanistan interim vehicles and kit approaching obsolescence. And the Department, to live within its budget, is having to trade some future defence capabilities.

    This will limit what our hard-pressed forces are able to do in future operations."


    (Cynics may care to note that: "Analysis of the costs of the Typhoon aircraft are currently excluded on commercial grounds ")

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmpubacc/165/16502.htm