Military Civil Partnerships

#1
Right, I'm off to what I think is one of the FIRST military civil partnerships on thursday.
Now, there's been ALOT of controversy around our little camp about their rights etc etc

Well that aside- I need to get a wedding present, and fast........ it's two females so think, think, think!!!





Retracted "that" sentence.... The key issue was a present!!!!!! ENOUGH!
 
#5
To keep a healthy balance in the relationship, might I suggest that one of your Lebanese friends gets given a copy of

"The Domestic Violence Handbook - By Doctor Franny Belter of Leeds"

It simply won't do, that both ladies have an equal hand in the partnership, so one of them will have to take on the role of Yorkshire-wife-terrorist to ensure happiness and stability for many years.

The book is crammed full of tips for both the novice and professional alike. With sections written by some of Britains most renowned spousal-pugilists, one of your friends will be 'walking into doors' within days.
 
#6
naafi_bird04 said:
Right, I'm off to what I think is one of the FIRST military civil partnerships on thursday.
Now, there's been ALOT of controversy around our little camp about their rights etc etc
Even the padre refused to hold the ceremony- holy prick.
Well that aside- I need to get a wedding present, and fast........ it's two females so think, think, think!!!
Are you suggesting that he's somehow obliged to perform a ceremony that may be fundamentally at odds with his religious undertanding?

Presumably if a couple of misguided satanist's wanted to make a blood sacrifice on the altar in his chapel he'd be holy prick for turning them down to?

You are having a laugh aren't you?
 
#7
convoy_cock said:
To keep a healthy balance in the relationship, might I suggest that one of your Lebanese friends gets given a copy of

"The Domestic Violence Handbook - By Doctor Franny Belter of Leeds"

It simply won't do, that both ladies have an equal hand in the partnership, so one of them will have to take on the role of Yorkshire-wife-terrorist to ensure happiness and stability for many years.

The book is crammed full of tips for both the novice and professional alike. With sections written by some of Britains most renowned spousal-pugilists, one of your friends will be 'walking into doors' within days.
Thats it....end the post now! We have a winner!
 
#9
strut_jack said:
naafi_bird04 said:
Right, I'm off to what I think is one of the FIRST military civil partnerships on thursday.
Now, there's been ALOT of controversy around our little camp about their rights etc etc
Even the padre refused to hold the ceremony- holy prick.
Well that aside- I need to get a wedding present, and fast........ it's two females so think, think, think!!!
Are you suggesting that he's somehow obliged to perform a ceremony that may be fundamentally at odds with his religious undertanding?

Presumably if a couple of misguided satanist's wanted to make a blood sacrifice on the altar in his chapel he'd be holy prick for turning them down to?

You are having a laugh aren't you?
misguided satanists..... What a load of codswallop! Be gone- foul beast
 
#10
balldrick said:
why is the padre a prick for refusing to hold a CIVIL ceromony it is not his job
Answer the question Naafi tart.

Just because the God Squad refuse to carry out someone elses job in coupling a couple of Dockers wearing clam jousters, how does that make him a prick?
 
#11
naafi_bird04 said:
misguided satanists..... What a load of codswallop! Be gone- foul beast
Yes, 'cos anyone wanting to make a blood sacrifice to anyone, for anything, is frankly misguided. If you reckon one religion is b*ll*cks, then all religion is b*ll*cks.
 
#12
Here's a thought for you. Now that it is no longer punishable by burning at the stake to be a cack pipe commando, whats stopping all of the singlies suddenly "turning gay" and "marrying" each other in civil ceremonies?

Surely a top notch way to get out of the block and into a pad?
 
#13
Aunty Stella said:
balldrick said:
why is the padre a prick for refusing to hold a CIVIL ceromony it is not his job
Answer the question Naafi tart.

Just because the God Squad refuse to carry out someone elses job in coupling a couple of Dockers wearing clam jousters, how does that make him a prick?
That was not the issue- and it's my opinion.
 
#15
Aunty Stella said:
Here's a thought for you. Now that it is no longer punishable by burning at the stake to be a cack pipe commando, whats stopping all of the singlies suddenly "turning gay" and "marrying" each other in civil ceremonies?

Surely a top notch way to get out of the block and into a pad?
I totally agreee.....What's your point?
 
#16
Aunty Stella said:
Here's a thought for you. Now that it is no longer punishable by burning at the stake to be a cack pipe commando, whats stopping all of the singlies suddenly "turning gay" and "marrying" each other in civil ceremonies?

Surely a top notch way to get out of the block and into a pad?
Funnily enough I understand a couple of RHA officers are considering just that, or possibly it's a double bluff on their part and they've finally found a workable cover?
 
#17
naafi_bird04 said:
Aunty Stella said:
Here's a thought for you. Now that it is no longer punishable by burning at the stake to be a cack pipe commando, whats stopping all of the singlies suddenly "turning gay" and "marrying" each other in civil ceremonies?

Surely a top notch way to get out of the block and into a pad?
I totally agreee.....What's your point?
Do you not understand the concept of "rhetorical" or has it got too many letters in it?
 
#18
Aunty Stella said:
naafi_bird04 said:
Aunty Stella said:
Here's a thought for you. Now that it is no longer punishable by burning at the stake to be a cack pipe commando, whats stopping all of the singlies suddenly "turning gay" and "marrying" each other in civil ceremonies?

Surely a top notch way to get out of the block and into a pad?
I totally agreee.....What's your point?
Do you not understand the concept of "rhetorical" or has it got too many letters in it?
Run along....
 
#20
naafi_bird04 said:
Aunty Stella said:
naafi_bird04 said:
Aunty Stella said:
Here's a thought for you. Now that it is no longer punishable by burning at the stake to be a cack pipe commando, whats stopping all of the singlies suddenly "turning gay" and "marrying" each other in civil ceremonies?

Surely a top notch way to get out of the block and into a pad?
I totally agreee.....What's your point?
Do you not understand the concept of "rhetorical" or has it got too many letters in it?
Run along....
Is that a "no" then?
 

Latest Threads

New Posts