MERS Coronavirus warning

[Nick Dipples]

That is not the latest science, it is a recent meta-analysis. I know what it says - that the studies they reviewed do not provide a good estimate of the effect. On the other hand, there is a whole lot of evidence that they do in fact work as you would intuitively think, some of which I have posted.

Why don't you want to wear a mask? Are you extremely autistic in a way that means you can't have anything on your face? Or highly anxious?

 

[Whey_Aye_Banzai]

That is not the latest science, it is a recent meta-analysis. I know what it says - that the studies they reviewed do not provide a good estimate of the effect. On the other hand, there is a whole lot of evidence that they do in fact work as you would intuitively think, some of which I have posted.

Why don't you want to wear a mask? Are you extremely autistic in a way that means you can't have anything on your face? Or highly anxious?

Lab studies don't always translate well into real world stuff. As Macron aptly displays.

You've still not provided that link about Prof Sikora. Why?

 

[Norsemaid]

The guardian has published a piece on Karol Sikora in May 2009 and therefore quite an old piece.
I've just read it myself.
He is was / is linked to oncology and appeared in the US to denounce Obamas Policies on health reform .
He used the imperial college name link to a commons select committee accordin pg to the guardian and imperial got their knickers in a twist as it was at best accordingto them a tenuous link .
I think this where the information has come from .
I shall have another little read around . Oh , Wikipedia also has him at imperial, but that's a headline and I shall whether it's been retracted.

 

[Whey_Aye_Banzai]

Here is a commentary on 2 studies in the lancet oncology. Somewhere between 1000 and 3000 additional deaths.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(20)30391-0/fulltext

I read through that but it didn't give a firm number of deaths; it said "Even so, patients whose symptoms are truly indicative of cancer have been disadvantaged, and some thousands will die as a result."

Where did you get your 1000 and 3000 additional deaths from?

 

[Nick Dipples]

I'm not going to do all your work for you, you can put your 'tism to work on Google. He's a total hack.

He has also been consistently wrong about COVID.

 

[Whey_Aye_Banzai]

He used the imperial college name link to a commons select committee accordin pg to the guardian and imperial got their knickers in a twist as it was at best accordingto them a tenuous link .

Did he? Or did the newspaper that published him add that in?

 

[wherewozeye]

Post the link you took that out of.

Cancer expert Karol Sikora accused over honorary professorship claim

Imperial College seeks legal advice to prevent arch-critic of NHS cancer care from using title associated with the university

www.theguardian.com

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Whey_Aye_Banzai]

I'm not going to do all your work for you, you can put your 'tism to work on Google. He's a total hack.

He has also been consistently wrong about COVID.

Okay, where do you get your 1000 - 3000 excess cancer deaths from?

It wasn't from that piece you linked.

 

[Nick Dipples]

I read through that but it didn't give a firm number of deaths; it said "Even so, patients whose symptoms are truly indicative of cancer have been disadvantaged, and some thousands will die as a result."

Where did you get your 1000 and 3000 additional deaths from?

It is in there you mong. I am tiring of your inability to read.

 

[Norsemaid]

Yhe college again took umbrage with the Prof in 2017 after appearing on newsnight .
KS is an oncologist in a private cancer university hosptial ( trying to find the article ) .
The tenuous link to imperial is that for a while he worked at Hammersmith hosptial which had links to the imperial .
He's known as a far right Speaker for privatising the NHS.

 

[Whey_Aye_Banzai]

It is in there you mong. I am tiring of your inability to read.

More disnigenuity.

Here's what it says

"Even so, patients whose symptoms are truly indicative of cancer have been disadvantaged, and some thousands will die as a result. "

 

[Norsemaid]

Did he? Or did the newspaper that published him add that in?

I'll try and post the article URL . IPAd being a pain .

 

[Whey_Aye_Banzai]

He's known as a far right Speaker for privatising the NHS.

Lots of countries have private healthcare, but they're not 'far right'.

Right of centre maybe?

Does he have other views that make him far right?

 

[Nick Dipples]

Lots of countries have private healthcare, but they're not 'far right'.

Right of centre maybe?

Does he have other views that make him far right?

Stop trying to make other people read stuff for you.

 

[Whey_Aye_Banzai]

Stop trying to make other people read stuff for you.

I've read the study a 2nd time; you're full of shit.

 

[pc supa]

Okay, where do you get your 1000 - 3000 excess cancer deaths from?

It wasn't from that piece you linked.

Just logged on again, on my device the advert above your post is for tarot card reading, made me laugh.

 

[Whey_Aye_Banzai]

Just logged on again, on my device the advert above your post is for tarot card reading, made me laugh.

You know ads are personalised, don't you?

I get some daft LG advert.

 

[Norsemaid]

Sorry, can't copy the thing but it says that
Professor Roy Anderson stated that KS has never worked for the imperial college and that he has been warned before about saying he was employed by them and they do not subscribe to his views .
They made the claim again as I said in 2017 .

 

[Nick Dipples]

I've read the study a 2nd time; you're full of shit.

Haha go on then.

 

[pc supa]

You know ads are personalised, don't you?

I get some daft LG advert.

View attachment 523157

Mine are normally dating sites, deffo not into any of that paranormal bollocks.