At least be honest with yourself. The false premise is that there is a trigger number of deaths that should result in people being locked in their homes. Those are your words, not any proposals by any Government anywhere in the world that I am aware of.
dear god, but I’m losing the will to live. Can you think of a reason why the latter didn’t happen? Do you think it might be something to do with the very thing you’re moaning about? Restrictions?
Tell me who has suggested staying in their house forever.
but there clearly is a trigger. 20,000 from flu is not enough, but a number for COVID was. What was that number?
I’m not moaning about restrictions, or saying they are ineffective, I just want to know what the trigger for them is. The scientific grounding.
Those wanting zero risk are wanting people to stay in their houses forever. If nobody wants this then they are accepting people must be exposed to the risk of infection and death for life to continue. I want that level of risk to be articulated. After today’s briefing it is clear that it has been decided people should work from home and not socialise. How many lives is that predicted to save? If It can’t be articulated, what premise is it being based upon?