Merkel giving the Hitler party member a 21 gun salute .. [ The POPE ]

#1
Can anyone answer this Question .... How does a person that knew of child sex crimes committed by fellow priests doesn't do jack shit except move them from one chapel to another .. and the crimes continue


He somehow evades jail , arrest , conviction Whilst other figures of religious cults get arrested and jailed ,

I was disgusted that bastard got allowed in the UK he should have been arrested but for Germany to give a former Nazi youth member a 21 gun salute on his recent visit to Germany whilst a number of German Mp's stayed away in protest the Goverment made sure the empty seats were filled to hide the shame , he like others abused german jews funnily when his past surfaced the deluded release a cock n bull story claiming he was forced whereas other notorious Nazi's fled to South America but he hid in the Church .

Why are Goverments not willing to pursue a criminal you cannot refute the claim or deny the hard facts he witheld criminals from the law But if he were a terrorist they would pursue but because he's a so called religious person they don't bother so why is there a rule for one criminal and a rule for another ..
 
#6
Can anyone answer this Question .... How does a person that knew of child sex crimes committed by fellow priests doesn't do jack shit except move them from one chapel to another .. and the crimes continue


He somehow evades jail , arrest , conviction Whilst other figures of religious cults get arrested and jailed ,

I was disgusted that bastard got allowed in the UK he should have been arrested but for Germany to give a former Nazi youth member a 21 gun salute on his recent visit to Germany whilst a number of German Mp's stayed away in protest the Goverment made sure the empty seats were filled to hide the shame , he like others abused german jews funnily when his past surfaced the deluded release a cock n bull story claiming he was forced whereas other notorious Nazi's fled to South America but he hid in the Church .

Why are Goverments not willing to pursue a criminal you cannot refute the claim or deny the hard facts he witheld criminals from the law But if he were a terrorist they would pursue but because he's a so called religious person they don't bother so why is there a rule for one criminal and a rule for another ..
See the OP's thread on drugs..............

1 - the price is regulated

2 - the gangs are out of business

3 - there is money to be made

4 - we always see the same argument by all parties stating lack of money for various projects etc [ it gets effing boring and predictable ]

5 - it's a person basic human right to make his or her choice for smoking and drinking same should apply for drugs

6 - it would free up Police time to work on un solved cases and more serious crimes and more police presence on the streets and save money on pointless court cases / lawyers fee's with the result being non effective

7 - we only live once on that planet gotta make the most of it no matter

8 - Crime does pay .. so why not cash in on it legally lol
Never get high on your own supply, window licker.

If Von braun was put on trial for crimes against humanity when Dora was liberated and what was discovered by the Soldiers ... instead of being giving sanctuary due to the fact he and others were creating Rocket / missile technology that was more appealing to the US Admin



How far of a step back would that have been for the US and they're adventure into Space ??
Full moon again?
 
#8
Can anyone answer this Question .... How does a person that knew of child sex crimes committed by fellow priests doesn't do jack shit except move them from one chapel to another .. and the crimes continue


He somehow evades jail , arrest , conviction Whilst other figures of religious cults get arrested and jailed ,

I was disgusted that bastard got allowed in the UK he should have been arrested but for Germany to give a former Nazi youth member a 21 gun salute on his recent visit to Germany whilst a number of German Mp's stayed away in protest the Goverment made sure the empty seats were filled to hide the shame , he like others abused german jews funnily when his past surfaced the deluded release a cock n bull story claiming he was forced whereas other notorious Nazi's fled to South America but he hid in the Church .

Why are Goverments not willing to pursue a criminal you cannot refute the claim or deny the hard facts he witheld criminals from the law But if he were a terrorist they would pursue but because he's a so called religious person they don't bother so why is there a rule for one criminal and a rule for another ..
Another mong thread from the OP who creates them and then never contributes..... and what exactly is current affairs about something that goes back years?

In answer to your stupid query, perhaps because the figure that you are referring to will be travelling on a diplomatic passport, as he is a citizen of the Vatican state!
IIRC there were an entire generation who were made to be members of that particular youth group, they didn't get much say in their membership in those days, join the club or be ostracised, Hitler and his henchmen were not very forgiving to those who made political points against them.
 
#9
In 1939 he was 12 years old and conscripted into the Hitler Jugend at the age of 14 as required by law.

Not at all sure what the OP is trying to say.
 
#11
In 1939 he was 12 years old and conscripted into the Hitler Jugend at the age of 14 as required by law.

Not at all sure what the OP is trying to say.
Don't think he knows either....poor man has lost his marbles I think.
 
#12
Can anyone answer this Question .... How does a person that knew of child sex crimes committed by fellow priests doesn't do jack shit except move them from one chapel to another .. and the crimes continue
.
Are you a priest? Do you feel guilty? Is there something you wish to share with us?
 
#13
The Pope is, effectively, an elected head of state but also the closest thing to a living deity for a significant proportion of the population of the world. Look at the trouble we have got ourselves into removing other heads of state lately.

The real issue is how could the RC Church be so niaive as not to realise that his election would be highly controversial and, inevitably, damage the standing of the organisation as a whole in the eyes of non-catholics. (Maybe they were not niaive but simply didn't care)

I would be interested to hear the view of a catholic believer in terms of what benefit the current Pope has brought to the church (we can all see the negatives).
 
#14
The Pope is, effectively, an elected head of state but also the closest thing to a living deity for a significant proportion of the population of the world. Look at the trouble we have got ourselves into removing other heads of state lately.

The real issue is how could the RC Church be so niaive as not to realise that his election would be highly controversial and, inevitably, damage the standing of the organisation as a whole in the eyes of non-catholics. (Maybe they were not niaive but simply didn't care)

I would be interested to hear the view of a catholic believer in terms of what benefit the current Pope has brought to the church (we can all see the negatives).
He's RC, he's white and he's a German, he's a perfect target for the media. Some black, Marxist guy would have been a more media savvy chose. But, anyone who believes the shit that's the media calls news is a moron and shouldn't be pandered to
 
#15
twony, thanks but Im not sure you answered any of my post that you so carefully quoted!
 
#17
twony, thanks but Im not sure you answered any of my post that you so carefully quoted!
Yeah, suppose I was being a bit obtuse.

The real issue is how could the RC Church be so niaive as not to realise that his election would be highly controversial and, inevitably, damage the standing of the organisation as a whole in the eyes of non-catholics. (Maybe they were not niaive but simply didn't care)

I would be interested to hear the view of a catholic believer in terms of what benefit the current Pope has brought to the church (we can all see the negatives).
What negatives? The ones you and lunatics like the OP can see?

The current Pope was always going get slagged off by the media. If, he was a black Marxist, he wouldn't have been such an easy target as a white guy who served in the German army in WW2.

But, pandering to morons who believe the shit the media come up with is pointless.

The guy was popular at the office, with his workmates, as he kept up to date with all the lastest memos and understood the instructions manual well. Naive, controversial choice... who cares. He was the best at his job and can probably deep throat while breathing through his nose.

Is that response to your post adequate?
 
#18
The man is guilty after the fact for withholding evidence and knowledge of those that committed evil acts why should those that proclaim to preach the word of god abuse those who look to them for guidance be avoided of paying for there crimes

Whilst we read of those that marry minors in Islamic nations were are sickend disgusted etc .. but when a man representing millions of people knows of sickening crimes against CHILDREN , Law turns a blind eye
 
#19
If I had been in Germany then I would have joined the Hitler Youth...Hitler was viewed then as a pop star is now...he gave Germans their self respect back and made them strong. I would have wanted to join the SS as it was an elite. This has to be veiwed as of 1939 and not 2011.

As for the church and its cover up of child abuse....guilty as charged.
 
#20
The real issue is how could the RC Church be so niaive as not to realise that his election would be highly controversial and, inevitably, damage the standing of the organisation as a whole in the eyes of non-catholics
The Roman Catholic Church is a very, very conservative organisation. Joseph Ratzinger was elected by the College of Cardinals for his ultra-conservative views and also because he was 78 years of age. His age is significant because if he changes his views during his papacy, things move so slowly that he will probably be dead before he has a chance to do any lasting damage. His predecessor, Karol Wojtyla was 58 and reigned for 26 years. He was open to change to a certain extent and would not have been as conservative as his successor. The Cardinals were not going to make the mistake of electing such a young pope again. Joseph Ratzinger fitted the bill perfectly, for example from 1981 until his election as Pope he was the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith or the Inquisition if you like. You don't get a job like that by being a liberal.
 

Latest Threads

Top