While reading through the stimulating publication called MATTs that I found in my in tray one day I have come arose this little mistake. I hope someone can either pass it up the chain to the required level or answer this for me. The publications required are.. MATT's and Training the Battle Shot (latest version, I think is 2005) Ok. MATT 1. Personal Weapon Test. In the chart called 'Timing and Instructor Qualification Requirements Summary' is says "Prior to WHT 10 mins of revision training may be required" and then goes onto list the relevant qualifications for 1. Giving the revision and 2. Taking the Test. And they are.... "Qualifications Required/Presenter" "Section Commanders Battle Course or Other Arms NCO Skill At Arms Instructors Course" It does not mention the CMCQ qualification. Now this is the problem. The SCBC does NOT teach you how to a. Instruct or give revision periods in SAA, or b. Take the WHT! In the Pam âTraining the Battle Shotâ, under the heading WHT, it lays down the qualifications required, which includes the CMCQ BUT does NOT include the SCBC. In the regulars the SCBC is a very long course which includes the SAA course in its length, but the TA one does not. It seems that the person who made the requirements for the MATTs got the regular/TA courses and qualifications mixed up. And that they did not bother to cross check the references and publications that give guidance to instructors and training Officers. This does need to be corrected otherwise there could be problems, incorrect teaching, or worse incorrect skills being passed and classed as competent.