Then the Canadian Constitution is what?
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Brave Sir Justin !
dangerlegal protest raised its head,
turned his taildecided one of his kids might have Covid and fled...
Then invoked the War Powers act and didn't use it,
then rescinded it immediately when the Senate looked like they'd question it...
Brave, brave, brave Sir Justin!
Your rights are a legal construct, protected by government( well not in your case). If they were a mental construct I could write them down a on a piece of double ply and ignore them. If we are using your example of “people” agreeing to them we can get a few members of this forum to come up with the Terminal Bill of Rights which you would be subject to.It said nothing about rights from 1867 to 1982. The Constitution Act of 1982 says that rights and freedoms are subject to reasonable limits as prescribed by law and can be demonstrated as reasonable in a democratic society. Is that what you are referring to?
Rights are a mental construct. They are what people have agreed they are. They don't exist outside of that.
Well done chaps. An absolute masterclass in deflection.
Not for class three mate. If any place has Class three parts then they will be registered with the ATF and anything they sell, a copy of the sales receipt and a copy of the buyers class three permit goes to the ATF.
Even buying that lower in the link you posted, still going to need an ATF class three permit to buy it.
Your natural "rights" extend to breathing, eating, drinking and sleeping. If they are infringed or denied you then your natural right is to die.We are born with our natural rights. They are not granted by my fellow citizens.
The ban crowd does not control enough States to do anything through Congress.
So you would prefer society to deal with the folks like Ramos the old school way?
Hate to argue with you but, legally buyable with no paperwork. There is a slight difference between a civvy semi auto upper and a milspec/LEO upper that precludes a full-auto trigger pack fitting in standard configuration. If you are a cartel Sicario; 15 minutes with a dremel, or a hacksaw and file and the full-auto trigger pack will fit a civvy upper....then just change the bolt group and away you go.
Just the same way you, or I could go and buy full-auto spec bolt group, bolt, or barrel for an UZI, or AK. All the pieces to build a full-auto UZI are available - supply chain allowing, bit dodgy at the moment. It is up to the individual to make sure that they adhere to the letter of the law by only assembling their box of UZI parts as a semi-auto UZI.
Is that the 4Chan one that is proven to be false? Although that didn't stop Congressman Paul Gosar from tweeting that the shooting was committed by a “transsexual leftist illegal alien"
They tried to prosecute his first victim, didn't they, his repeat domestic violence victim who managed to escape being burned alive by hiding in the woods before he started his killing spree.Highly apposite, many families of the victims and their lawyers have just walked out of the Royal Commission into the NS mass shooting.
'That's not acceptable': Families of N.S. shooting victims, lawyers boycott inquiry in protest
"It's total bullshit"
For those not aware, the Premier of NS resigned shortly after failing to prevent a Royal Commission from happening. Pure coincidence, I'm sure. Now the appointees are trying to make sure it's the usual whitewash, but if the victims' families walk out, that's a fail too.
Unfortunately, 'Fact Checkers' are about as reliable as a DIY condom, but yes, Gosar is a tw@t.Is that the 4Chan one that is proven to be false? Although that didn't stop Congressman Paul Gosar from tweeting that the shooting was committed by a “transsexual leftist illegal alien"
PolitiFact - No, these photos of a person wearing a skirt aren’t of the Uvalde, Texas school shooterSome social media posts are sharing images of a person wearing a skirt and wrongly claiming that they show Salvador Ramowww.politifact.com