terminal
LE

(...)
In addition, a 2018 CRPC study ranked the U.S. at number sixty-four in the world in terms of mass shooting rates per capita.
The actual report makes interesting reading
I've broken my response down into two posts. Here's the first.
Here's his list of the 64 countries with a higher per capita rate of "mass shootings" based on number of incidents. There seems to be a certain commonality between most of them. I'll let you decide what that is.
- Northern Mariana Islands
- Iraq
- Afghanistan
- Central African Republic
- Solomon Islands
- Guyana
- Somalia
- Nigeria
- Burundi
- Algeria
- West Bank and Gaza Strip
- Yemen
- Colombia
- Angola
- South Sudan
- Sudan
- Sri Lanka
- Lebanon
- Uganda
- Pakistan
- Israel
- Sierra Leone
- Armenia
- Syria
- Libya
- Kenya
- Philippines
- Niger
- Mali
- Chad
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Tajikistan
- Kosovo
- Finland
- Honduras
- Cameroon
- Nepal
- Macedonia
- Namibia
- Azerbaijan
- Georgia
- Switzerland
- Rwanda
- Mauritania
- Albania
- Liberia
- Tunisia
- Thailand
- Peru
- Serbia
- Ivory Coast (Cote d'Ivoire)
- Bosnia
- Russia
- South Africa
- Haiti
- Croatia
- Norway
- Guinea
- India
- Kyrgyzstan
- Belgium
- Yugoslavia
- Slovakia
The ones that stand out as the exception are the following, with number of incidents and their motivations.
- Finland 3 (nutters)
- Switzerland 3 (nutters)
- Belgium 2 (one nutter, one Islamic terrorism)
- Norway 1 (terrorism - Breivik)
- Slovakia 1 (nutter)
I don't think that anyone disputes that Belgium has a problem with Islamic terrorism. That aside, that leaves only one nutter, which again is a single data point.
That leaves Finland and Switzerland. Unfortunately citing those is not helpful to the cause of saying that the problem has nothing to do with gun laws, as those two countries have some of the most liberal gun laws in Europe.