Ooh! Can't have someone getting "something for nothing", can we? I suppose like all folks of a selfish disposition, you suggest that she gets nothing, right? And what then? Do you think they'll give you a "cut" of what they save? The lady is getting what she's entitled to under the present system.
Let's face it, everyone's happy if they get something for nothing. Millions around the world play lottery every week on the off-chance that they can get something for nothing. Your beef is that you're not. And anyway, what business is it of yours?
MsG
Let's face it, everyone's happy if they get something for nothing. Millions around the world play lottery every week on the off-chance that they can get something for nothing. Your beef is that you're not. And anyway, what business is it of yours?
MsG
I watched a program the other day (one of them true life documentaries) where a chap who got brain damage (result of accident) had the bailiffs evict him from his house. It's should never have got that far. That is an example of someone who does need social help.
So no. Not socialism for all. But definitely for those in need.
Sometimes I do like your debate view points. But this one of yours is true mongdom.
*does not include those who require work after injury, surgery etc.