Marchers demand apology over raid

#1
Well Well, Dose he suddenly support Brazil in the World Cup all of a sudden!!!!

 
#2
AH Brazil, that great Islamic nation.
 
#3
Roadless said:
AH Brazil, that great Islamic nation.
Yes too great Cities, Rio de JanerioStan and Sao Paulostan!!
 
#4
By way of apology the Met should get down to Argos and invest in "Wahl" hair clippers and treat the suspects to a beard trim (no guard on the clippers).
 
#5
Can I protest to demand an apology for their protesting?
 
#6
I suppose the police should be aloud to drag men out of there beds or off a train then shoot em dead or injure them in the name of the fight on terror. Until it happens to you or someone close to you.

Your more at risk from lightening than a terrorist .
 
#7
matt12345 said:
I suppose the police should be allowed to drag men out of there beds or off a train then shoot them dead or injure them in the name of the fight on terror. Until it happens to you or someone close to you.

You're more at risk from lightening than a terrorist .
With regard to the two seperate shootings, fair enough they deserve apologies, because they both appeared to have been bungled.

However, I couldn't give two sh*ts how many times the police have to drag someone out of their bed. Should the police not conduct raids then?


I don't care what the odds are on me being subjected to terrorism, and I doubt you'll find many here that do. What I do care about however is terrorism happening in Britain. The odds may be low on me being a target but if a bomb goes off, someone from my country would cop it.
 
#8
I'm sure that bloke missed a sitter against Australia...
 
#9
Perhaps they can use part of the £38000 in cash found by police during the raid to raise suit against the Met..
The cash allegedly was being held for their mum, in a locked suitcase...hidden in a basement....of the house next door...which they own too...she didn't want to put it in a bank.
See....its all a big misunderstanding....bless 'em.
 
#12
inbredyokel666 said:
Perhaps they can use part of the £38000 in cash found by police during the raid to raise suit against the Met..
The cash sllegedly was being held for their mum, in a locked suitcase...hidden in s basement....of the house next door...which they own too...she didn't want to put it in a bank.
See....its all a big misunderstanding....bless 'em.
£38k! that'll be the half of it :D
 
#13
inbredyokel666 said:
Perhaps they can use part of the £38000 in cash found by police during the raid to raise suit against the Met..
The cash sllegedly was being held for their mum, in a locked suitcase...hidden in s basement....of the house next door...which they own too...she didn't want to put it in a bank.
See....its all a big misunderstanding....bless 'em.
£38k! that'll be the half of it :D
 
#14
inbredyokel666 said:
Perhaps they can use part of the £38000 in cash found by police during the raid to raise suit against the Met..
The cash allegedly was being held for their mum, in a locked suitcase...hidden in a basement....of the house next door...which they own too...she didn't want to put it in a bank.
See....its all a big misunderstanding....bless 'em.
£38k, that'll be the half of it. :D

Sorry, problems with my laptop.
 
#15
Awol said:
matt12345 said:
Your more at risk from lightening than a terrorist .
No you're not.
Here is my info . Clik bottom link to read full articlal. From CNN website.


"You're more likely to be struck by lightening than you are to be harmed by a terrorist event," said Bruce McIndoe, CEO of the travel intelligence company iJET and architect of various programs used by national intelligence agencies. "


Click Here and Read
 
#16
matt12345 said:
Awol said:
matt12345 said:
Your more at risk from lightening than a terrorist .
No you're not.

Click Here and Read
Nice one there Matt, not only is the source talking about American terrorism, it was also written two and a half years before the London bombings and attempted London bombings, which I am sure might have lessend the odds a little.
 
#18
Well actually mat has a point, most of these ANTI-TERROR cases
are over-hyped. It seems the police are more concerned with inviting
the media around, with silly PR than do the job correctly

I believe the more they plug terrorism the less critism will be
placed on the failure to follow up crime such as burgulary and robberies
both of which is prity rampant.

And another that
really gets on my tits is when I see Sir Ian Blair talkin sh*t on TV, when
it isnt his job, Police always used to have a spokesperson. Its as if he
is looking for votes or somthing,
 

Sixty

ADC
Moderator
Book Reviewer
#19
I've been fairly fortunate in that I've managed to get through life without being shot for something I didn't fucking do. The apologists for the polizei on this thread are pathetic.
 
#20
Death_Rowums said:
matt12345 said:
Awol said:
matt12345 said:
Your more at risk from lightening than a terrorist .
No you're not.

Click Here and Read
Nice one there Matt, not only is the source talking about American terrorism, it was also written two and a half years before the London bombings and attempted London bombings, which I am sure might have lessend the odds a little.
Lessened the odds in what way. From 1 in 9 million to 57 in 9 million.

It is also about americans traveling abroad which means the whole world.
 

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top