'Lose the Lads' Mags

#1
'Deeply harmful to women...' My arrse! If they are bumping their gums purely because they are on display, then to get round it, just have them in a non see through plastic sleeve. Job done! The mags are still on sale and pisses these feminist groups off even more as they'll still be in view.... Albeit no tits!!


'Lads' mag' sellers could face legal action - ITV News
 
#2
Considering all these women in said magazines are pictured voluntarily, usually for a hefty fee, and are quite happy to do so as it's (usually) their job/career choice pretty much means the feminist organisation's argument is shot down a bit.

They see it as 'objectifying women' and making them 'always available for sex', but in reality it's a load of blokes gawping at something extremely aesthetically pleasing that none of us will ever get to have anything to do with.

Feminists piss me off.
 
#5
Do they ever other asking people before they come up with these opinions.

I find their aggressive feminism deeply offensive and believe if I were to start a male group with equal ferocity it would be subject to objection. Therefore these group's very existence contravenes the very laws they try to use without correct regard.
 
#6
Maybe Zoo should have a 'Feminist' issue one month.... The front cover with a blonde in a frigid cardigan, ankle length skirt with a very regal look.
 

Joker62

ADC
Book Reviewer
#7
Do they ever other asking people before they come up with these opinions.

I find their aggressive feminism deeply offensive and believe if I were to start a male group with equal ferocity it would be subject to objection. Therefore these group's very existence contravenes the very laws they try to use without correct regard.
Go for it, Dingerr, we could call it "Ladsnet" ^^
 
#12
I assume these same feminist loons would happily give up their seat on a crowded tube for a bloke. No? Thought not.
 
#13
Lad's Mags? Do these ladies (oops!) not have an Internet connection? I hardly think these soft magazines compare with rubbernunbuggery.com et al.
 
#14
Damn it, That means it will be harder to find copies of "Ugly carpet munchers"
 
#15
On 5live as I type. Outraged wimmin gobbing off about things that they've got nothing better to chunter about. The UK Feminista cow is getting more and more shrill as the discussion develops.

She should STFU and get her melons out.
 
D

Davetheclown

Guest
#16
are these the same feminists that on the apprentice turn into shrieking banshees in the boardroom.

When I get my business running the whole place is going to have blokes in it. Due to I hate power crazed feminist bitches being anywhere near men. I have had a slew of female bosses who are micro managing bitches that did my head in.

I think men these days are slowly being treated as second class citizens in the UK.

Car insurance (glad that got sorted as sexist)

Adverts, every bloke on a advert that has a woman in it is portrayed as lazy, stupid or in the wrong.

Feminists should just **** off.

Cancer treatments more money spent on womens treatments

If a bloke gets himself ill for 9 months, recovers and wants 3 months off he will be sacked.

If you want a career dont have babies and feel that your workplace has to fund your lifestyle choice

Kitchen sinks should have TV fitted that plays soap operas

Ban the sale of 1.1 litre cars to anyone with a blue rinse and lives on a A road, also make it a legal prerequisite that if a blue rinse owns a car that does 0-60 in six seconds keep off A roads.

Also ban fat birds

Womens magazines are offensive as it promulgates the theory that men are baby pumps and good for nothing else.
 
#17
So, taking phots of a lass who is being payed for getting her speed bumps out is objectifying and evil. Yet cosmo(I'm so metrosexual) photographers can get their gucci long lenses out and take snaps of unsuspecting fat z list celebrities on holiday.

Sounds fair.
 
#19
Yes, I agree with the lovely bean flickers entirely, it's high time we got back to some victorian values!



Phwoooaaaarrrrr!!!!
 
#20
In the 80s there was a big feminist push to get rid of soft porn from newsagents with a focus on WH Smith. As a result of this push, WH Smith stopped stocking the top shelf with the likes of Club International, Playboy, Mayfair, Men Only etc. This created a gap in the market which was filled by..... yes, Lads mags. Another result of this push was Motorway service areas wrapped up their top shelf magazines in a way which covered everything bar the title of the magazine. Oddly enough they left Forum alone.

Some of the comments about the proliferation of female vanilla magazines are spot on. The market focuses on the female readership because this is where the money is. So male general interest and hobbyist magazines are slowly being pushed round the corner of the isle to the floor level. The power of marketing.

I've met some quite political feminists over the years and they all were against this extremist point of view. Some of them were heavily into BDSM as the submissive which gave them a big problem since those in their peer group who knew of their flavour castigated them mercily as playthings of the chauvinists.

The only result of this I can foresee is a change in magazine style once the fuss has died down again which fills the hole in the market which no doubt will result through all of this.
 

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top