Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by tomahawk6, Jan 19, 2005.
The heart of the site is the forum area, including:
Pretty accurate story from debka.
Good to see the deployment of the troops but the M14 the best sniper rifle? Give me a No4T any day.
While I agree that calling the M-14 the best sniper rifle ever is a stretch, I'd take it anyday over the Enfield.
I think I read on this site that a Canadian soldier scored a kill shot at over a mile with a Barrett .50 BMG semiautomatic rifle.
M14/M1A, with a good scope, bipod, capable of superb performance out to about 800 yards. Also, I don't know of a rifle with better factory iron sights.
Not familiar with "No4T."
The No4 T was the old lee enfield service rifle but built by Holand and Holland to sporting specs. it was very accurate given the limitations of a flexible action.
The same goes for the M14 ( I thought the sniper version was th M21 but could be wrong) it is very accurate for what it is, a semi auto.
In the long range stakes a bolt action will always be a better bet, due to its inherent ridgidity. Best all round is a combination of Winchester Model 70 .300 win Mag and a good scope.
mind you having a mag of 20 and rapid shots up your sleave cant hurt if the brown stuff hits the fan.
In gulf war1 I met up with a couple of Yank snipers outside the Emires stadium in Kuwait city, they were carrying a very long case which contained a 50cal snipers weapon with the biggest scope I have ever seen on it. They were saying that with the right wind conditions and elevated position they could do a head shot at about a mile and a good kill chest shot at nearly 2 miles. I don't know how true that is being a REMF but when I got down behind it on it's bi-pod I was gob smacked by the sight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A U.S. Marine scout sniper scans for insurgents in the streets and buildings along the edge of Fallujah, Iraq, during the first hours of Operation al Fajr (New Dawn) on Nov. 8, 2004. The Marine is assigned to Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division
You're right about the M21, they also made a later version, the M24 which was bolt action.
Although the LE No4 is probably the better dedicated snipers rifle, the M14 is more useful in "up-tempo" situations.
I remember my first experience of the M14, it is a sweet weapon, feels and sounds just right, which may be a little subjective, but it always puts a big grin on my ugly mug.
I was thinking more along the 'sign' angle as well. The M14/M1A is a semi-auto. With the bolt action LE No4T, it's a lot easier to keep hold of the case.
Is it true that there's an odd clearance procedure for the M14 because it can be damaged by "firing" empty?
They're BS-ing you, there are reports of occasional 1 mile body shots with the Barratt.
For the proponents of the No.4T, it's not on a par with modern rifles in terms of accuracy or ergonomics (about 2 MOA compared with <1MOA).
I'm not aware of any problems with dry firing, perhaps that was on the early model.
Ah, I see where you're coming from. Its a good point SB.
Why do you think all old ranges in the UK are 1000 yds?
After the problems and the transition in the infantry during the Boar war the army taught its soldiers (all infantry) to shoot out to 1000 yds. The effects of this can be seen in Flanders at the start WW1. This was continued through the 30s with the 2nd BEF able to engage and kill the enemy at longer range. Unfortunately war had changed and assault weapons had come of age.
Some anecdotes from my grandfather who was an infantry soldier in both wars,
On talking to soldiers after Dunkirk the feeling was the MP38 was a far better weapon than the SMLE and they were outclassed. His comment was that with a rifle you could kill the enemy long before they got in range of the SMG.
When instructing recruits in shooting he would set up a tin on a 4ft screen and fire at it from 1000yds to show what a good shot could do. The recruits where suitably impressed when the tin fell off. As he said with a grin on his face it did not mater what part of the screen he hit, the tin would fall off.
The point, he could hit a 4ft screen at 1000yds every time without thinking about it and so could all infantry. So jumping up and down with joy because a sniper can hit at 800m with a visual aid is not impressive. With an SLR I could consistently hit a fig 11 at 600m with iron sights. And Iâm and average shot.
I tend to agree, there is an over-emphasis on optical sights these days. A good shooter can achieve remarkable results over iron sights with the simple expedient of "Kentucky windage" hold off & hold over. This kind of shooting tends to be seen as a black art these days, whereas, modern marksmanship techniques emphasize the scientific aspects of ballistics.
Separate names with a comma.