Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by OldRedCap, Feb 15, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Not going into the whole saga of Ken's remarks to a journalist - they deserve each other - but something he said in connection with his outburst I do find interesting
    In these days of duplicitious dealing, it is refreshing to read something where the guy says what he means rather than some mealy mouthed p.c. gibberish.[/b]
  2. Quite agree with his remarks about that horrible little rag - The Daily Mail!! Every time I have the misfortune to see a copy I am amazed at some of the unpleasantness within the articles.
  3. The fact that he hates the mail or the evening standard is not the point. He should have been able to control himself and not made outrageous comments (but then again his above the law isnt he? :roll: )

    The guy is a snivelling champagne socialist and despite him not feeling that an appology would be approriate or that he wouldnt mean it, sometimes ken, we have to get over our own importance and come back to the real world. Face it what you said was offensive and as such you should appologise.

    rant over :D

  4. I'm with Old Red Cap! Nice to see a poli speaking his mind and not what the PR man says.

    The probelm is he has attcked a journo (fair do's) by using a racial slur (not-very good) to be blunt I think he is Fcuked.

    Sad cos he has been great for London and 5th column within the Labour Party.
  5. I detest Ken Livingstone and his (pro-IRA) politics, but I do admire him for refusing to make an insincere apology. How many politicians have used the 'S' word to save their neck when they blatently haven't meant it? The whole sorry saga is just a typical PC feeding frenzy, and as usual with these things I'll bet nobody is really even offended by what was actually said.

    The real insult to the memories of the Camp victims comes from politicians of all sides who would use a row like this to score cheap political points.
  6. "You can't expect to work for the Daily Mail group and have the rest of society treat you with respect and as if you're a useful part of society. You are not." Ken Livingstone, London mayor and former restaurant critic for the London Evening Standard's ES magazine, part of the Daily Mail group.
  7. Any Londoners here seen that free newspaper, called "The Londoner" or something like that which carries no advertising and is exclusively funded at taxpayer's expense and is simply a pro-Ken propaganda rag of the worst type?
  8. I listen to the actual tape of the conversation on Jerremy Vines program today. The reporter was being inquisitive only not demanding anything unusual and red ken just loist it and insulted the reporter.

    It doesn't matter what newspaper he works for Ken should have kept his mouth shut and reverted to the "No Comment" option and put the phone down. He's twit and should apologise for his comments. In real terms if the reporter felt like it Red Ken could end up in court on racial charges (good thing IMHO)

  9. Perhaps Ken was refering to Concentration camp Guards in the context of the South African Campaign where Concentration camps were effectively invented by the British, or their use by the Germans in West Africa where tens of thousands of African bushmen were worked to death. Or perhaps he was referring to it in the context of the millions of non-jews such as Russian prisoners, Gypsies, homosexuals or politcal prisoners who died in the Camps.

    The Jewish populations of Europe were devastated by the actions of the Nazis, but since then the history books have been progressively refined to erase non-Jewish victims.

    I too dislike Ken Livingstone's politics intensely, but for once I admire his stance. What he said was (and I am working from newspapers, not having heard the broadcast) not anti-semitic, it was anti intrusive reporter. Not perhaps the best thought out riposte, but not a crime (either real or imagined)
  10. Red Ken can't expect to have it both ways. He's a high-profile politician. As such, he should be able to cope with media inquiries without resorting to insults. If he's incapable of doing that, he's unfit to be a leader. Nor, in a democratic society, can he pick and choose which papers to speak to. Much as I, like others here, dislike the DM's brand of journalism, if politicians go down that road, it's the start of the kind of censorship our oppos have given their lives to prevent as part of the defence of freedom-of-speech.
  11. BK!

    BK! Old-Salt

    Sorry FTB. Ken was bang out of order on this one. I heard the tapes on the telly last night. Ken said something vaguely daft, the journo pointed out he was Jewish and took offence at the comment and then Ken let rip.

    Absolutely no excuse for that. He had the opportunity to back down with good grace and instead, not only blew it but dug himself a deeper hole.

  12. what the f*ck are you on! go to Belsan or Aushwitz, where has the non-jewish part of the death toll been erased.

    as we have seen on urban75 and the Guardian, it ain't racist anymore if its against a jew!
  14. ok, point taken, but

    if a man is talking b*llocks, not only do i not have to agree with him, but i certainly do not have to respect him for it.

    by all means, freedom of speech and expression i will defend, and i would defend Ken's utter b*llocks (which, let's be honest, is most of what he says) but as an adult, you should know when you've been wrong and be big enough to admit it.

    I have no problem with apologies from politico's, if its honest and justified. march in, admit you fecked up and write out the cheque to the ABF (or equivilant civy org).

    Apologies along the B*Liar vein; for everything in the past that you have no control over, is useless and pedantic.

    I would have respected Ken if he said "ok, wrong call, bit drunk and annoyed with journo, shouldn't have said it". That would have been fine, and probably have garnered some support from the public who viewed journo's only slightly higher on the evolutionary scale then politico's.
  15. Claymore sums it up perfectly for me! :D