The toothless tiger once the direct interests of one or more permanent members is involved? Such as Syrian govt chemical weapons for example?Is there a need for the UN anymore? Given Russia is a member of the SC and an untouchable.
We've had the discussion before. Russia was approachable on the early 90s but not any more.
Maybe if their vetoes were reduced/removed on things like HR abuses, but of course it would need a 'none vetoed' vote for that to happen. I believe it has been mentioned but a couple of countries appear to be against it for some reason.