Labours jobs miracle - a disaster for a whole generation

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by Semper_Flexibilis, Aug 13, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. "Jeff Randall says it is way too late to blame the Tories for the latest, terrible unemployment figures."

    Huh what da ya mean.
    Too late to blame the hated Tory.
    It's never too late means ta say we have only been in Absolute Power since 1997, mind you Good Old Gorden the Great has only been in top slot for 2 ? years ish.
    john
    It's never too late to explain to the Great Unwashed It's all the Tories fault, definitely Maggie's curse on UK.
     
  2. There is one reason, and one reason only that bLiar chucked it when he did - he saw the whole nulab 'miracle' was going to go tits up spectacular style. Forget the special deals about handing power over to Cyclops, bLiar left on his own terms at his time of choosing.

    And since Cyclops has been the idiot who was in charge of the money all those years he deserves every single bit of sh!te he's getting now.

    I get the impression New Labour could have been in power for 100 years and some people would still think it was all the Tories fault though :roll:
     
  3. You are all so "of message". Ashie, Sven/Whet and parapauk will be along shortly to re-educate you!
     
  4. In 1982, unemployment breached 3 million, 3 years after the Conservatives got into power - because she had to make massive changes to the economy to stop it collapsing completely (anyone remember 1979, 1978, 1977 etc - under Labour). Thatcher did not inherit a good economy, she got the leftovers of ruin and incompetence - left behind by Labour.

    12 years after Labour got into power, a new Conservative Prime Minister is being left exactly the same legacy. A country ruined by envious, spiteful, incompetent liars. It's going to take another generation to fix broken Britain again. Before this is done, unemployment is going to hit approx. 3.5 million - maybe even 3.75 million as tens of thousands of non-jobs (jobs that massaged the unemployment figures, at huge cost to the tax-payer) in the state sector are thrown where they belong - in the bin, to balance the books.
     
  5. Sad thing about the "up to date" figure is, they neglect to mention that anyone who is signing on, and on a training course, is not included as being on the unemployed list.
    Even though they are, and are still getting benefits, so the actual figure is almost twice the quoted number.
     
  6. Not to mention those on the sick because it's more convenient for the figures and the huge numbers of young people doing courses in Sugababes Studies at the University of Neasden etc.
     
  7. Indeed - they aren't counting those on incapacity either. In the last 12 years, about 2.5 million people have suddenly found themselves 'broken' rather than merely unemployed, and have thus been removed from the lists.

    As you say - those on 'training', but signing on are excluded too.

    Plus another 200,000 non-jobs created by the state merely to reduce the unemployed rates still further.

    Not to mention the 10's of thousands who have lost their jobs but haven't signed on, due to redundancy payments or the fact that their partners now support them.

    I would hazard a guess and say that the REAL unemployed figure in the UK (those able to work, but not in work) is somewhere closer to 5 million.
     
  8. The real catastrophe on the conservative years wasn't the cyclical unemployment, it was the elimination of an entire sector of the economy that provided jobs with decent pay and prospects that were both suitable for the non-academic and fostered a sense of community amongst those involved with them. It was a mistake no one else in Europe made, and one we'll never be able to row back from.
     
  9. You might want to look into when that really happened:

    [​IMG]
     
  10. msr

    msr LE

    I think your location should read Planet Zog., not earth.

    msr
     
  11. How am I wrong?
     
  12. Would you care to explain why that is anything other than the most depressing graph of Government mendacity?
     
  13. You talk of the Coal Miners for a start - STILL haven't learned the truth of that one.

    Seeing a you like graphs so much - check out the graphs for number of people employed down the mines over a 50 year period. Pay close attention to the Labour run periods.

    Those very same non-academic jobs were being held to ransom by militant-trotskeists hell-bent on seeing yet another government fall, and not giving a toss about the UK while they tried to bring it to a standstill. It was an industry that, at the time, could not compete with oil, which was half the price.

    Edited to add: Parapuke - have you noted in the graph the corresponding rise in incapacity claimants, or the fact the the total number claiming one sort of benefit or another has been pretty static throughout? I bet you won;t dare put up this year's figure when they come out :twisted:
     
  14. There is a big difference between a natural shift toward a more capital-intensive extraction and manufacturing industry and taking a wrecking ball to the whole thing.

    It's amazing that despite most of Western Europe having a far more active communist and union movement than the UK they were somehow able to get through the period without throwing the baby out with the bathwater, isn't it?

    Personal insults, good to see you've found your level... :roll: