labour *still* throwing good money after bad...

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by maguire, Jul 10, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. maguire

    maguire LE Book Reviewer

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/10/id_card_advertising/

    'The Identity and Passport Office has appointed another advertising agency to persuade the public of the apparent benefits of ID cards.

    The IPS has chosen Proximity after also hearing pitches from EHS Brann, Tequila and TMW. The firm will deal with "below the line" marketing - typically PR and promotions rather than billboard or media advertising.'

    ffs...
     
  2. It's a bit like the EU Treaty isn't it?

    'We'll just keep running it past you until you give us the answer we want…'

    Quasi-Facist cvnts the lot of them.
     
  3. If Cameron was actually serious about his pledge to scrap ID Cards he would have threatened to introduce legislation to void ab initio all contracts without compensation for breach as one of the first acts on his legislative programme.

    The world and his wife know full well that Labour will be out of office next year and will enter the political wilderness for many years thereafter. No commercial entity would dare risk significant financial loss by even considering tendering for government contracts in this area and ID cards would be dead in the water!
     
  4. Gordon’s Political Balls Ups.

    Labour Ministers can get very cross and grumpy when their foul ups are criticised. Instead of criticising fellow MPs and Ministers, criticise them for their appearances instead. Guffaw loudly, snigger and point at them making snorting noises.

    For example, say…”Goodness Gracious, Gordon. We never realised just how huge and ugly your nose is!” Once that has been said several times….. Gordon will only be too happy to be criticised for his total lack of common sense and howling incompetence....!! :oops: :p :? :(
     
  5. So giving HMG the ability to breach any contract that they've entered into. Have you any idea what that would do to risk premiums in contracts? That risk premium is the extra cost of companies not trusting HMG to do it's job properly.

    Anyway, one of the main issues with the whole ID card farce is that even if Cameron makes good on his assurances, cancelling the ID card part of it won't save a great deal of money, most of it is going into the underlying database that's associated with the passport system anyway.

    It's interesting that they appear to feel the need to separate out the overt communications from this style, although different companies have different competencies.
     
  6. It makes you wonder where all that fecking money goes. I mean, on Monday evening we flew into Manchester airport and when we and 3 other flights worth of people arrived at the 'UK Border', there was only 3 stooges to check the passports. There are 6 desks, but even with a bottomless pit of a budget and with the price of a passport exceeding the rate of inflation by ten-fold, it's very fcuking annoying when you have to queue for half and hour whilst the only 3 members of the Stasi that are on duty check to see if you're Osama Bin Laden.

    It's also a sharp reminder that you're back in Blighty. Pay through the nose for everything and always get a shite service in return.

    They should change the sign from 'UK Border' to read 'Welcome back to Shitsville, High Taxes, High Crime, High Surveillance and a Bent and Corrupt Government to abuse you'
     
  7. Yes. No surprise then to learn that if you type ''Pro New Labour'' into google, all that comes up are things that new labour is pro. Not a hint of a website which is pro labour.
     
  8. To be fair the humourless bunch of bar-stewards in the States are just as bad.

    "what do mean they've all gone to lunch? Three Jumbos have just landed... :x "
     
  9. Then ex hypothesi, the suggestion is that a state of affairs should continue because it it too expensive to terminate. Or put in another way, one Parliament may bind a future Parliament by the simple expedient of legislating for something for which there exists no popular mandate and made an permanant and irreversibe aspect of life for every Crown subject in the Kingdom in perpetuity because it would be too expensive not to.

    If companies wish to bid for Crown contracts then they bear the risk of doing so. Government policy is not, has not and never will be driven by the venal demands of the Insurance Companies.
     
  10. No, the legislation that you suggest would need to apply to all contracts, not just specific contracts related to the programme. That would give HMG the ability to walk away from any contract on the basis that the incumbent politicians didn't like it.

    You may be quite content to give HMG that kind of power, personally I'm not keen, and not least because of the impact on costs. We live in an essentially capitalist economy, underpinned by a trust in the contracts that govern commercial relationships. The concept that HMG can consider itself above the law with respect to contract leads to two issues, the practicality of contracting with HMG and the more general concept of what powers we allow HMG to give itself.

    Future government is not being bound to the programme, they can walk away, but have to account for the fact that it costs money to do so.

    And they reflect that risk in the prices they charge. Is it any surprise that HMG pays higher costs for commoditised products and services when one considers the amount of governance, and the frequency with which requirements change and special cases are included.

    Methinks you miss the point of how the commercial risk is reflected in the pricing. companies exist to give value to their shareholders. The executives have a responsibility to ensure that value is maintained and cost models will reflect that. This is not about insurance companies but the maintenance of a capitalist economy.

    Governments should be tightly constrained in what they can do, the way to deal with a government that isn't, our present one, is not to ease those controls still further in the future.
     
  11. msr

    msr LE

  12. Getting a UK Passport from the British Consulate in Duesseldorf costs over 140 Euros.
    The application for is different from the one you get in the UK and you can't self certify the photos, there are extra bits to fill in if you are born abroad.

    If you need help you can call up an IRISH call-center at 2 Euros a minute(British jobs for British Workers).

    The difference is price between the £77 paid in the UK and the 140 Euros here is called a Consulate Fee and is used to keep to the good work of the Consulates going, however, if you need a Consulate official outside of normal working hours you are charged 160 Euros/hour.

    When I visit the UK they don't even attempt to match the face to the photo and just scan/record the document number.
     

  13. Well the data base should be going the ways of the ID card, and government contracts are there for companies to do business should they choose and rightly give them a fair profit for services supplied, not to be the tail wagging the dog.

    If a business does not like the terms they don't have to take the risk. For to long now many business see providing service to the country as a cash cow to be bleed dry with no limits or requirement to provide said services timely as asked and to a agreedd budget.

    And i am well aware also that at times the government buy bad.
     
  14. I had to renew my passports (x2) at a British Embassy. Cost about £300. Month or two later, I was turned away from a USA flight because my new passport was not of the latest type. When I complained to the Passport "Service" that my expensive new passports were not usable, they said "oh yeah, the British Embassies have to use up their old stock before they get the new type of passport"...... Unbelievable. There are African countries with better civil institutions....
     
  15. This happened to me in Switzerland, I got a Passport with no machine markings on it in 1999.My previous one,1989, was machine readable.

    After a few years of jetting around Europe, my new Passport started looking a bit tatty, causing every Bundesgrenzschutz official to examine it with a magnifying glass as the plastic was peeling away over the picture. I called up about a replacement(when visiting my parents)and was told I had to report to a Passport center in the UK if I wanted a new one in anything under 1 week.It would have been less hassle to report it lost or stolen and re-apply.