Labour admits conspiracy for mass immigration

#1
Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser
Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor
Published: 6:42PM BST 23 Oct 2009

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said the revelations showed a "conspiracy" within Government to impose mass immigration for "cynical" political reasons.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.

Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the "major shift" in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.

He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.

He wrote: "Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

"I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn't its main purpose – to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date."

The "deliberate policy", from late 2000 until "at least February last year", when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.

On Question Time on Thursday, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour's immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.

In his column, Mr Neather said that as well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a "driving political purpose" behind immigration policy.

He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has "enriched" Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.

But he acknowledged that "nervous" ministers made no mention of the policy at the time for fear of alienating Labour voters.

"Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom.

"But ministers wouldn't talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn't necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men's clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland."

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: "Now at least the truth is out, and it's dynamite.

"Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right.

"This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage."

The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said: "We welcome this statement by an ex-adviser, which the whole country knows to be true.

"It is the first beam of truth that has officially been shone on the immigration issue in Britain."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...K-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html
 
#4
"He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has "enriched" Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place. "

You really do have to wonder how much you would have to hate, indeed loathe, your culture, your country and your fellow citizens, before you would even contemplate something like this. One can only marvel at the sheer contempt which the people responsible for this hold for their constituents. As he says, this kind of thing wouldn't play well in Sheffield or Sunderland. Anyone still thinking of voting Labour in the coming election?
 
#5
The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
I think that in all honesty that the feckwits didn't have a fecking clue what their fcuked up policies would do and that this is just a dreamt up story to make it sound that it was all planned and that it was all part of the Zanu-Labour plan.
 
#6
jaspery said:
He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".
No s**t Sherlock!

The Skeletons are starting to come out of the cupboard now, hopefully many more of these stories will appear before next May!
 
#7
All you can expect from the Marxist scum that despite the lies peddled over the last decades have ruled Labour from day one.

The only good communist is a dead communist.

The next step is for Labour to export their Marxism to the EU(which has been going on with quite some sucess) ,and then rule unchallenged by the inconvienience of national elections.
 
#8
Jaeger said:
"He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has "enriched" Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place. "

You really do have to wonder how much you would have to hate, indeed loathe, your culture, your country and your fellow citizens, before you would even contemplate something like this. One can only marvel at the sheer contempt which the people responsible for this hold for their constituents. As he says, this kind of thing wouldn't play well in Sheffield or Sunderland. Anyone still thinking of voting Labour in the coming election?
Voting for them wasnt a thought that entered my head. More that these vile treacherous scum should be hanging from lamposts.
 
#9
Jaeger said:
"He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has "enriched" Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place. "

You really do have to wonder how much you would have to hate, indeed loathe, your culture, your country and your fellow citizens, before you would even contemplate something like this. One can only marvel at the sheer contempt which the people responsible for this hold for their constituents. As he says, this kind of thing wouldn't play well in Sheffield or Sunderland. Anyone still thinking of voting Labour in the coming election?
It goes much further than "contempt for their constituents", I hope I'm wrong,but is it possible they set out to manipulate the votes to allow them to hang on to power,and if it came to it,a YES vote for pro-Europe would be assured?
 
#10
I'll say it again, anyone who still plans to vote New Labour needs sectioned.

An utter shower of cnuts, no redeeming features, not one decent thing has this government done in all it's time in power. And now it's clear that they are indeed actually fcuking up the UK on purpose. Wonderful people aren't they :x
 
#11
I've been saying for years that this was a deliberate policy of social engineering by New Liebour.

Historically, Immigrants tend to vote for the party in power when they arrive. Liebour has imported a huge client state of voters too keep it in power.
 
#13
wommit said:
And Broon still won't call an election until the law forces him to.

The next general election will be on June 3rd 2010.

And just before it, Broon will announce some nebulous and indeterminate 'grave' terrorist threat.


People tend to vote for the sitting government when they feel threatened.
 
#14
wommit said:
And Broon still won't call an election until the law forces him to.

The next general election will be on June 3rd 2010.
And by then how many more"vote riggers" will they have allowed in? No wonder Straw kept his gob shut on Q.T. last night, guilty secrets?
 
#15
countymounty said:
wommit said:
And Broon still won't call an election until the law forces him to.

The next general election will be on June 3rd 2010.
And by then how many more"vote riggers" will they have allowed in? No wonder Straw kept his gob shut on Q.T. last night, guilty secrets?

Currently, we have about 7 million 'extra' NI numbers than the official figures say there should be.


As our American cousins say… Go figure!
 
#16
Oil_Slick said:
countymounty said:
wommit said:
And Broon still won't call an election until the law forces him to.

The next general election will be on June 3rd 2010.
And by then how many more"vote riggers" will they have allowed in? No wonder Straw kept his gob shut on Q.T. last night, guilty secrets?

Currently, we have about 7 million 'extra' NI numbers than the official figures say there should be.


As our American cousins say… Go figure!
It would be interesting to know into whose "marginal" seats they have "chosen" to live in.
 
#17
countymounty said:
Oil_Slick said:
countymounty said:
wommit said:
And Broon still won't call an election until the law forces him to.

The next general election will be on June 3rd 2010.
And by then how many more"vote riggers" will they have allowed in? No wonder Straw kept his gob shut on Q.T. last night, guilty secrets?

Currently, we have about 7 million 'extra' NI numbers than the official figures say there should be.


As our American cousins say… Go figure!
It would be interesting to know into whose "marginal" seats they have "chosen" to live in.

I wonder which constituencies have the highest levels of postal votes…

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4387027.stm
 
#18
Oil_Slick said:
countymounty said:
Oil_Slick said:
countymounty said:
wommit said:
And Broon still won't call an election until the law forces him to.

The next general election will be on June 3rd 2010.
And by then how many more"vote riggers" will they have allowed in? No wonder Straw kept his gob shut on Q.T. last night, guilty secrets?

Currently, we have about 7 million 'extra' NI numbers than the official figures say there should be.


As our American cousins say… Go figure!
It would be interesting to know into whose "marginal" seats they have "chosen" to live in.

I wonder which constituencies have the highest levels of postal votes…

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4387027.stm
Day canno spik de lingo yet,neva mund wrote or spulls it,so's ah fulledit in fur dem. all 90 papers! They've only bin here 20yrs!
 
#20
wommit said:
And Broon still won't call an election until the law forces him to.

The next general election will be on June 3rd 2010.
Someone - it might have been Guido Fawkes reckoned the election will be the same day as the local council elctions (May 4th?). Reason being Labour is skint and can only afford one campaign fund.
 

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top