kicking fcuk outta priest "one off mistake"

#1
A drunken teenager who beat up a priest walked free yesterday after the judge accepted the attack was a 'one-off mistake'.

Babul Islam was one of three Asian youths who attacked Canon Michael Ainsworth in his churchyard.

The 19-year-old punched the vicar in the head while others kicked him ' one allegedly shouting 'f*****g priest' ' only stopping when passers-by intervened.

His battered victim spent nearly two weeks in hospital after the assault.
Anyone else think that if it was the other way round, with a British teenager attacking a Muslim priest it would be different?

BBC linky

METRO linky
 
#2
Hell yes, it would be a whole different story.

Just how far would these youths have gone had passers by not intervened? Would it still have been "a one off mistake" had the man died?

I fail to see how this country is going to reduce violence when idiot Judges let yobs like this off!
 
#3
Nice idea Mr_Deputy but nothing will happen.

Elders and cmmunity leaders will do nothing so as to avoid keeping this incident in the public eye, nor will anyone else do anything for fear of being accused of racism.

Race aside, any attack regardless of whether the perpetrators were drunk/stoned/depressed/etc should be dealt with severly. This attack may well have been the first comitted by those youths but having got away with it once...

First offences should carry a harsh penalty, few would reoffend.
 
#4
:evil: bring back hard labour( no not the political cnuts) beast the **** out these criminal scum . They should earn basic privilages and enough of this sitting in a cell playing playstation wii etc .

Police should be given discretion to put little shites like this in the van and kick crap out of them with batons and pepper spray used as well .
 
#5
I could understand it if was some random in a pub .Everyone allowed one mistake and seen things kick off in a pub for no reason,but, A Preist
there is no excuse for that he should have gone down .
 
#7
Striking a priest is of course a mortal sin. As however Mr Islam is already a heretic and will deservedly fry in the pits of hell, then we'll just be taking this one into consideration...
 
#12
smudge67 said:
Where was God?!
What many people fail to understand is that God is spending so much time on tablets of stone these days that he is forced to reduce commitment to beat duties in order to cope. He has been on sick leave with stress related illness since the period of the fourth crusade in any case. In the meantime God Community Support Officers are doing their best to pick up the slack.
 
#13
This is just the PITS, I mean doing a PRIEST over and saying it was "A one off mistake". Bullbagels!. It may take a few years but I can see a time when Corporal Punishment is brought back and scum like these are FLOGGED till their cowardly backbones shine through the gory mess, but meantime I call down Curses on them and the likes of them
 
#14
I don´t see how this was a "one off mistake". If they shouted "F*****g Preist", alledgedly, then surely it was not a mistake.

Likewise, even if it was a mistake that they attacked a preist, they STILL attacked somebody.

String the fcukers up. Don´t care if they are Muslim, Moony or Christian. They should go down, for a long time..... pref hard labour.
 
#15
chocolate_frog said:
I don´t see how this was a "one off mistake". If they shouted "F*****g Preist", alledgedly, then surely it was not a mistake.

Likewise, even if it was a mistake that they attacked a preist, they STILL attacked somebody.

String the fcukers up. Don´t care if they are Muslim, Moony or Christian. They should go down, for a long time..... pref hard labour.
I think the "Mistake" was being caught.....
 
#16
Can I suggest that everyone who has posted on this thread meet me at Limehouse Station, where we shall proceed to call on Mr Islam and beat him and his "crew" to a bloody pulp.
 
#17
Islam, of nearby Limehouse, deserved a prison term for his crimes, Judge Brasse told him at Snaresbrook Crown Court. But he was told 'under the circumstances' a four-month suspended sentence, paying his victim £1,000 and 100 hours of unpaid work would suffice
Hopefully the unpaid work will be on a pig farm. can't claim religious exemption as , apparently, at the time of the attack, he was drunk and I seem to remember alcohol being taboo in islam.
 
#18
boobs said:
A drunken teenager who beat up a priest walked free yesterday after the judge accepted the attack was a 'one-off mistake'.

Babul Islam was one of three Asian youths who attacked Canon Michael Ainsworth in his churchyard.

The 19-year-old punched the vicar in the head while others kicked him ' one allegedly shouting 'f*****g priest' ' only stopping when passers-by intervened.

His battered victim spent nearly two weeks in hospital after the assault.
Anyone else think that if it was the other way round, with a British teenager attacking a Muslim priest it would be different?

BBC linky

METRO linky
Perhaps they wanted to see how far they could go, and to that end they proved to themselves and everyone else that if your muslim you can get away with a lot more than being of any other faith.
They are just a bunch of Cowards that need a good leason, for the law is an ass.
 
#19
Bullbagels? FFS bullbagels?? :wink:
 
#20
I could be mistake but can't sentences like these be appealed if they're considered to be too lenient? Doubt it would come to anything though what with the government trying to encourage the judiciary to stop sending people to prison as they've run out of spaces.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top