Judges free child images man over fears of abuse in jail

#1
FFS, are all judges now recruited from the Planet Cretin?

Judges free child images man over fears of abuse in jail
A man who was jailed for possessing child abuse images has been freed by a judge who said he was at risk of becoming "another inmate's bitch".
Dean Aaron Gee, 29, of Esplanade, Scarborough, was sentenced to 10 months in prison on 11 May after admitting possessing indecent images of children.
But the Appeal Court has replaced it with a three-year community order.

Freeing Gee, judge Mr Justice Stadlen said: "He would probably be abused and made another inmate's bitch."

'Exemplary life' Lord Justice Rix, Mr Justice Stadlen and Mr Justice Hickinbottom, sitting at London's Criminal Appeal Court on Tuesday, quashed the jail sentence in light of "exceptional mitigation" in his case. He will instead be required to attend a sex offenders treatment programme.

The court heard that Gee had "lived an exemplary life" and set up a charity to help young people after suffering an "appallingly dysfunctional" childhood himself.
His possession of child sex images was exposed after a thief broke into his car in a Manchester street last year and stole his laptop computer.
He was jailed at Manchester Crown Court after admitting 17 counts of possessing an indecent photograph of a child.
'Utterly abhorrent'

His lawyers told the Appeal Court that psychiatric reports had revealed he was looking at the images as a result of trauma he had suffered during his own "persecution" as a child and "didn't pose a risk to real children in the future".

Mr Justice Stadlen said: "The material on the computer was utterly abhorrent."

However, the judge added that Gee had "devoted his life to charity work", despite his bad start in life, and his background and his reaction to it made his case exceptional.
The judge also said there was a real risk that prison would be "devastating" for Gee and potentially leave him suicidal if he himself were sexually abused.
He concluded: "This is one of those very rare and exceptional cases in which the public interest didn't lie in a sentence of imprisonment."

From: BBC News - Judges free child images man over fears of abuse in jail
 
#2
Community order so that all those outside can have a pop instead
 
#4
He should be released only to run the gauntlet, Scarborough promenade, well advertised for those wishing to take part. I have just the thing!

 
#5
Indeed - isn't that the whole point of imprisoning nonces?
 
#6
Unbelievable.

At least the world now knows Dean Aaron Gee's name and address. Let's just hope that good burghers of Scarborough give him what he deserves now that the limp wristed ******* Judge hasn't.
 
#7
.................................. "didn't pose a risk to real children in the future".
This sort of statement really grips my s**t. Was there no risk to the children featured in the downloaded images? Maybe they weren't "real" children.
This thing, along with any other child molester, should be locked in a room with the mothers of child victims.
 
#8
All depends on what you think prison if for, purely for punishment or to keep them away from the rest of us and to facilitate re-integration into society?

If it is for punishment then why do we leave it to other criminals to do our punishing for us?

If you really think that a bit of male rape along with a good beating is the correct sentence then why not vote for politicians that will impose that?
 
#9
Another way of saying, "As the prison authorities have abandoned any attempt to maintain proper order in the institutions they supposedly control, it is necessary to release any prisoner incapable of defending himself from sexual assault."

No doubt many prisoners will seek to take advantage of this new convention.
 
#10
If you really think that a bit of male rape along with a good beating is the correct sentence then why not vote for politicians that will impose that?
I would but sadly none of the parasites are man enough to agree to implement punishments according to the will of those who elected them.
 
#11
I would but sadly none of the parasites are man enough to agree to implement punishments according to the will of those who elected them.
Yes there are. Most of them go by the name of Mohammed or the like but they are well keen on a bit of hand chopping off and beating with canes and hanging in football stadiums and so forth, so vote for one of them.

Civilisation is over rated any way. :evil:
 

jarrod248

LE
Gallery Guru
#12
I assume they still have wings for 'vulnerable prisoners' or healthcare wings? Judges and magistrates know very little about prisons, they used to come and visit on a bus trip.
 
#13
Yes there are. Most of them go by the name of Mohammed or the like but they are well keen on a bit of hand chopping off and beating with canes and hanging in football stadiums and so forth, so vote for one of them.

Democracy is over rated any way. :evil:
Fixed that for you. No need to thank me.

Most judges are so far out of touch with Reality they could'nt make contact by shouting loudly and hitting it with a big stick. There are some exceptions, but the majority are part of the problem, not the solution. In fairness to the Jurassic Transvestites(thank you, Drop the Dead Donkey)the entire UK criminal "justice" system is not fit for purpose and needs root and branch reforms.

And that will happen on the day after Never.
 
#14
Yes there are. Most of them go by the name of Mohammed or the like but they are well keen on a bit of hand chopping off and beating with canes and hanging in football stadiums and so forth, so vote for one of them.

Civilisation is over rated any way. :evil:
Whilst you are quite correct, I was thinking more along the lines of ones who are not hypocritical. The ones you mention tend to be doing lots of the very things they like to punish other for.
 
#15
I really do not understand the title of this thread, read it three times, still no. On the subject, there you go, job jobbed and he can stay in prison, where he belongs.
 

Attachments

#16
There's a fairly senior member of the Navy still in employment with them, who has 2, yes 2 courts martial proceedings behind him for collecting kiddie porn images. They were categorised as being only one level below the highest grading there is. He's still a serving Navy bummer only because some senior army officers saw fit not to jail him as it would be 'detrimental to his career' . No shit Sherlock! Judges and senior officers - they're all ******* barking.
 
#17
There's a fairly senior member of the Navy still in employment with them, who has 2, yes 2 courts martial proceedings behind him for collecting kiddie porn images. They were categorised as being only one level below the highest grading there is. He's still a serving Navy bummer only because some senior army officers saw fit not to jail him as it would be 'detrimental to his career' . No shit Sherlock! Judges and senior officers - they're all ******* barking.
Why should obsessively masturbating over images of children being raped stand as an impediment to further promotion, or even render one persona non grata in the Mess?

You'll be telling me next that a fellow can't bugger his cabin boy anymore....
 
#18
.................................. "didn't pose a risk to real children in the future".
This sort of statement really grips my s**t. Was there no risk to the children featured in the downloaded images? Maybe they weren't "real" children.
This thing, along with any other child molester, should be locked in a room with the mothers of child victims.
Those who make such declarations should be held to account, should the inevitable happen and the 'reformed' nonce/rapist/murderer harms another victim. I'd even go so far as to state that such people shouldn't be realeased to a hostel or similar. They should go to their lead supporters house. And live there for 3 months.
 
#19
'His lawyers told the Appeal Court that psychiatric reports had revealed he was looking at the images as a result of trauma he had suffered during his own "persecution" as a child and "didn't pose a risk to real children in the future".'

It's always the same pissing excuse from them when they get caught! Always trying to worm their way out of it with some contrived/bullshit sob story. Always some slimy 'lawyer' defending them when they're blatantly guilty.

The really sad thing is the real victims get painted with the same brush as the abusers, when some of them actually go on to dedicate years bringing those pieces of shit to justice.

The bloke in question may have got off lightly for now, but justice has a very long arm and an infallible memory, and his past will catch up with him.
 
#20
I hope I'm only give a community order when they find my secret stash of Bros LP's and threaten to lock me up.
 

Latest Threads

Top