John Bercow redecorates his flat, and it costs us £45,000

Biped

LE
Book Reviewer
#1
Remember the apartment that Michael Martin decorated for £700,000 at tax-payer's expense?

Well, good old Bercow, the new Speaker has just made it a bit nicer, and cheaply too. His redecoration only cost £45,000!

Good on him I say. I could only just build a whole bungalow for that sort of money, let alone put some wallpaper up too!

Telegraph

Speaker John Bercow's official residence refurbished for £45,000
The Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, has had his grace-and-favour Westminster apartment refurbished at a cost of £45,000 to the taxpayer.

Mr Bercow ordered the makeover, covering work from child-friendly redecorating to new televisions and furniture, within weeks of his election as Speaker in June.

His wife, Sally, oversaw most of the work and the couple pushed ahead with the overhaul despite being warned by Parliamentary officials that the costs may be seen as excessive.

Emails reveal that Mrs Bercow compiled a lengthy “shopping list” of items that she wished to have changed in the Speaker’s historic official residence within days of her husband’s election.

The new documents, released under Freedom of Information laws, also disclose that Mr Bercow has spent almost £13,000 on entertaining and hospitality - including a three-night trip to Rome costing almost £4,000 - in just three months.

Mr Bercow had faced criticism over his use of expenses when he was a backbench Conservative MP, claiming the maximum amount permissible to fund another Westminster flat.

The new disclosures about Mr Bercow's spending are likely to prove embarrassing for the new Speaker who was elected on a promise to restore trust in Parliament in the wake of the MPs' expenses scandal.

During his campaign to become speaker, he said: “It is high time the House (of Commons) was run by professionals on a transparent basis, ensuring that we are accountable to the people who put us here.”

Michael Martin, his predecessor as speaker, had been criticised for his use of taxpayers’ money, including extensive renovations of the speaker’s official residence which ran to more than £700,000.

After succeeding him, Mr Bercow vowed to modernise Parliament and make it “accountable to the people” and transparent in its operation.

He pledged to surrender the MP's second homes allowance worth more than £24,000. However, the new documents disclose, he has already ordered renovations on his new Westminster appartment worth more.

In August, the Speaker admitted that he spent just over £20,000 on refurbishing his official apartment before moving in with his wife and children.

However, documents have now revealed how the true cost was actually £45,581, as Commons officials agreed to account for extensive redecoration and other work as 'routine maintenance' which Mr Bercow did not declare publicly.
 
#2
Well, that will be nice for his Socialist wifey!

Is there some sort of infection, exclusive to politicians, that makes the recipient wholly insensitive to the disdain in which they, the politicians, are held by most of us - the tax-payers?
 
#3
They have kids, Lord Gorbals' Mick did not. Given the heritage I assume is all over the Speaker's Apartment, some work is likely to be necessary.

It's a Grade 1 listed building, you can't just pop down to B&Q for a tin of egg-shell Magnolia.

Never gone in to a quarter and spotted faults that the previous occupant had lived with?

Non-story.
 
#4
Idrach said:
They have kids, Lord Gorbals' Mick did not. Given the heritage I assume is all over the Speaker's Apartment, some work is likely to be necessary.

It's a Grade 1 listed building, you can't just pop down to B&Q for a tin of egg-shell Magnolia.

Never gone in to a quarter and spotted faults that the previous occupant had lived with?

Non-story.
No it isn't

Whilst I agree that kiddy proof windows and socket covers are a must requesting a bigger tv- to replace the one in situ- and dvd player are bang out of order!

They both work so those items come from their salary and not my taxes!
 
#5
archer said:
Idrach said:
They have kids, Lord Gorbals' Mick did not. Given the heritage I assume is all over the Speaker's Apartment, some work is likely to be necessary.

It's a Grade 1 listed building, you can't just pop down to B&Q for a tin of egg-shell Magnolia.

Never gone in to a quarter and spotted faults that the previous occupant had lived with?

Non-story.
No it isn't

Whilst I agree that kiddy proof windows and socket covers are a must requesting a bigger tv- to replace the one in situ- and dvd player are bang out of order!

They both work so those items come from their salary and not my taxes!
Speaker John Bercow's official residence refurbished for £45,000
The Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, has had his grace-and-favour Westminster apartment refurbished at a cost of £45,000 to the taxpayer.

By Robert Winnett, Deputy Political Editor
Published: 10:00PM GMT 13 Nov 2009

John Bercow with wife Sally Photo: PA
Mr Bercow ordered the makeover, covering work from child-friendly redecorating to new televisions and furniture, within weeks of his election as Speaker in June.

His wife, Sally, oversaw most of the work and the couple pushed ahead with the overhaul despite being warned by Parliamentary officials that the costs may be seen as excessive.


Related Articles
MPs' Expenses: The Telegraph's investigation
Cameron and Osborne mocked up as Jedward by Labour
Queen's Speech: pay to have your DNA removed from database
Labour 'can win fourth general election after Glasgow North East'
John Bercow spent £45,000 on Speaker's apartments Emails reveal that Mrs Bercow compiled a lengthy “shopping list” of items that she wished to have changed in the Speaker’s historic official residence within days of her husband’s election.

The new documents, released under Freedom of Information laws, also disclose that Mr Bercow has spent almost £13,000 on entertaining and hospitality - including a three-night trip to Rome costing almost £4,000 - in just three months.

Mr Bercow had faced criticism over his use of expenses when he was a backbench Conservative MP, claiming the maximum amount permissible to fund another Westminster flat.

The new disclosures about Mr Bercow's spending are likely to prove embarrassing for the new Speaker who was elected on a promise to restore trust in Parliament in the wake of the MPs' expenses scandal.

During his campaign to become speaker, he said: “It is high time the House (of Commons) was run by professionals on a transparent basis, ensuring that we are accountable to the people who put us here.”

Michael Martin, his predecessor as speaker, had been criticised for his use of taxpayers’ money, including extensive renovations of the speaker’s official residence which ran to more than £700,000.

After succeeding him, Mr Bercow vowed to modernise Parliament and make it “accountable to the people” and transparent in its operation.

He pledged to surrender the MP's second homes allowance worth more than £24,000. However, the new documents disclose, he has already ordered renovations on his new Westminster appartment worth more.

In August, the Speaker admitted that he spent just over £20,000 on refurbishing his official apartment before moving in with his wife and children.

However, documents have now revealed how the true cost was actually £45,581, as Commons officials agreed to account for extensive redecoration and other work as 'routine maintenance' which Mr Bercow did not declare publicly.


Mr Bercow is expected to be under pressure to release a breakdown of the work conducted as 'routine maintenance'.

Emails show how Mrs Bercow, who last week declared her desire to become a Labour councillor in Westminster, communicated with Parliamentary officials over the refurbishment requirements.

“The existing wall paper is very office/board-roomy,” she wrote on June 30th.. “So, if at all possible, can the walls be redecorated.

“Can the TV be replaced with a larger one and moved into a more central location (like it or not, it will be a focal point for the kids!!!),” she continued. “I assume it will have SKY and we’ll need a DVD player too if possible.”


The work – initially estimated to have cost £23,400 by July 8th - had almost doubled in price by the end of the same month.

The emails show that Commons officials were becoming concerned about the spiralling cost of the work. However, they agreed to allow the Bercows to continue with the renovations.

One official wrote on July 1st: “My concern is that the list is getting longer, which isn’t technically a problem, but I know that you are very mindful of the costs and only wish to do what is considered as ‘reasonable’.

“The latest version [of the renovations spreadsheet] has everything included and I think that the best way to view it, is as a shopping/wish list. If any costs come out as excessive…we can always review the options and make the necessary decisions.”

An email discloses that the £45,000 cost of the work was split into two spreadsheets before the lower £20,000 figure was released in August.

Any redecorating which had not been done for at least five years was described as the 'routine maintenance' and excluded.

However, it can also be revealed how the costs of this routine maintenance doubled between an estimate in early July of £11,500 and the final cost of £24,922 just three weeks later.

A source close to the Speaker said that most of the extra work was to parts of the official residence which are not used as the family’s private living quarters.

He said that the £20,000 figure which had been released originally represented the additional cost to the taxpayer of the Speaker being someone with children.

“We tried to isolate the costs to the taxpayer of Mr Bercow and his family moving in,” he said. “A lot of the other work is beyond the control of the Speaker and is determined by English Heritage and other bodies.

“Mr Bercow has no plans to do anything, this is a one off.”

The new Speaker has also spent £12,812 on entertaining and official functions during his first three months. This is far higher than the amounts spent by Lord Martin of Springburn during his final three years in office.

Mr Bercow’s entertainment costs include £3,599 on a three night trip to Rome to attend a G8 Speaker’s conference. He was accompanied by three other people whose identities are not disclosed in the released documents but are thought to be officials.

He is the second youngest Speaker in history and the first in living memory to have three young children – Oliver, Freddie and Jemima, who are all under six.

The official speaker's residence is underneath Big Ben in the Palace of Westminster. It was designed by Charles Barry and contains a state dining room and a canopied bed to be slept in by the monarch on the night before a coronation.

Mr Bercow has previously said that much of the renovation work was necessary to make the apartment child-friendly. For example, locks had to be fitted to the windows for the safety of his young children.

He previously lived in another flat in Westminster which was also funded by the taxpayer. He repaid almost £8,000 earlier this year after The Daily Telegraph raised questions about his lawful avoidance of capital-gains tax on the sale of two properties.

However, Mr Bercow is thought to have refused to surrender his gold-plated pension – which guarantees to pay half his income when he retires regardless of how long he remains in the job. As he is only currently aged 46, this is a very valuable perk.

In an interview to be broadcast on Sunday, Mr Bercow will defend his wife’s right to stand as a Labour candidate in next year’s council elections.

But he acknowledged that he could expect the mother of his three children to be portrayed as “a cross between Jerry Hall, Lady Macbeth and Eva Peron” because of her decision to get involved in electoral politics.

“My wife isn't my chattel, she's my wife,” he will say on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show.

“She is a private citizen who has her own views and is an independent person. And it has long been known that my wife is a supporter of the Labour Party, so I don't think there's anything odd, embarrassing and certainly there's nothing underhand about it.”
 
#7
archer said:
The work – initially estimated to have cost £23,400 by July 8th - had almost doubled in price by the end of the same month.
Why tis great value for the tax payer so it is.

And can I tarmac y'drive as well now sir? Ah go on, go on, go on...
 
#8
We need pads quarters... lots of them in London. So the MPs and their lackeys can live in them.

It would be a come down for her, to be lived in by MPs, but maybe HMS Invincible could be used as a sort of Thames floating hotel.
 
#10
Idrach said:
They have kids, Lord Gorbals' Mick did not. Given the heritage I assume is all over the Speaker's Apartment, some work is likely to be necessary.

It's a Grade 1 listed building, you can't just pop down to B&Q for a tin of egg-shell Magnolia.

Never gone in to a quarter and spotted faults that the previous occupant had lived with?

Non-story.
What like rising damp and holes in the walls? Yes. So what?

I had to bring my own telly by the way....
 
#11
We shouldn't be surprised. He was vote in as Speaker by the Labour party. They recognised one of their own.
 
#12
Idrach said:
Never gone in to a quarter and spotted faults that the previous occupant had lived with?

Non-story.

You forgot .....faults that other people caused. Stained carpets and matresses that would not be replaced until they had reached a certain age. Thats why we BOUGHT our own from OUR OWN MONEY!!
 
#13
Kids or neh kids, are these cnuts above doing a bit of self help....

It's a bsatrad free cnuting house, surely the fricking time bandit can get a bit of decorating done, or is he that fecking useless.
 
#14
From the BBC

Commons Speaker John Bercow has denied allegations that he spent £45,000 re-decorating his grace-and-favour apartment in the Palace of Westminster.

The Daily Telegraph reported he spent £45,581 on work, including new wallpaper, furniture and televisions

It says Mr Bercow previously admitted spending £20,000 making his apartment suitable for his family, but the true cost was more than twice this.

However the Speaker said he had no say in much of the spending.

In an e-mail to Telegraph editor William Lewis, Mr Bercow said the difference between the two sums, £20,000 and £45,581, was accounted for by the cost of maintenance required by the House authorities,.

He stressed he had not personally asked for the work to be done.

'Invariably expensive'

Mr Bercow said: "The entire difference between that sum (£20,000) and the £45,000 figure you have publicised is due to maintenance that the House authorities contended was long overdue according to their own rulebook.

He added: "It is a matter of regret that, because of its status as a grade one listed building and a world heritage site, almost anything to do with the repair or refurbishment of Parliament is invariably expensive."

The £45,581 figure was obtained by the Telegraph under a freedom of information request.

The documents retrieved also show Mr Bercow has spent almost £13,000 over three months on entertaining and hospitality, including £3,599 on a three-night trip to Rome to attend a G8 Speakers' conference.

So a bona fide story? Not on your nelly. Right wingers didn't want Berkow as Speaker, the Torygraph starts slinging non existant mud.
 
#15
John Bercow now being defended by Sven/Whet and the BBC.

Draw your own conclusions.

With a bit of luck the normal convention of the Speaker not being opposed at the election will be ignored pretty soon. If Cameron does not have the balls to de-select him and field a proper candidate then it may be a golden opportunity for an independant candidate to stand on an anti-sleaze ticket
 
#16
So he paid the £20'000 from his own pocket then??
No I thought not.
Tell me how does a bigger TV, Sky TV & a DVD player make it more child friendly?
He earns enough those items should be bought from his own bloody income!
 
#17
I suppose there will be a rush to gets things done now before they lose the right, voting for a UK government is as much use as voting for an x-factor contestant, they're all a bunch of fcuktard cnuts!
 
#18
Herrumph said:
John Bercow now being defended by Sven/Whet and the BBC.

Draw your own conclusions.

With a bit of luck the normal convention of the Speaker not being opposed at the election will be ignored pretty soon. If Cameron does not have the balls to de-select him and field a proper candidate then it may be a golden opportunity for an independant candidate to stand on an anti-sleaze ticket

Berkow will not be deseected, nor will there be an independent taking his seat. In fact, I would be surprised if any who are foolish enough to stand don't lose their deposit.
 
#19
I'm afraid that I'm going to partly agree with Whet here.

Why does the online version of the Torygraph not contain the sentence which made clear that when Bercow (either Mr or Mrs, forget which) asked for the wallpaper to be replaced, they suggested painting over it to keep the cost down? Supporting the suggestion by noting that it would be easier (read cheaper) to remove kiddie's fingermarks from the wall if this were done...

Bigger TV? IIRC, this is one of those daft things which the state provides for the Speaker's apartment because the taxpayers generously furnishes said location. Daft rule which Bercow should've ended, or refused to abide by.

That trip to Rome? Torygraph doesn't seem to mention that it was a meeting of the Speakers of the G8 nations, so whoever was Speaker would've gone to it, nor do they note that the British party was one of the smallest to go, thus costing rather less (I'd hate to have the bill for the Chinese party, which would've constituted an invasion force in some countries, so large was it). Purely an oversight, of course, and I'm sure that the Torygraph didn't want to create a situation where readers might have inferred he was on some personal jolly because they weren't fully appraised of the facts....

Could we have a scenario where the Torygraph is having a pop at Bercow (a man it doesn't like who is married to a woman said 'paper likes even less) while being a little selective?

I am no fan of Bercow and his journey from right to left seems to me to have been conducted more for reason of personal ambition than principle - but I'm afraid that I'm beginning to get a bit tired of the Torygraph's regular bid to inspire some sort of Pavlovian reaction with expenses stories, particularly when it appears that we're now being treated to the sort of selective quoting and spin that we'd expect from Mandelson and Campbell.
 
#20
In an interview to be broadcast on Sunday, Mr Bercow will defend his wife’s right to stand as a Labour candidate in next year’s council elections.
How can he seriously criticise Labour whilst married to one?

If my missis told me she had decided to support Labour, I'd have no option but to bury her under the patio.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top