Jeremy Bamber-Fitted up or wot?

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by fingers_1661, Apr 26, 2012.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. i've scanned him....creepy ******
  2. I've spoke to him on e mail (honest!). It was part of a Uni project. Having studied this case at length, there were so many **** ups by the police, he shouldn't be in jail. Their SOCO and Crime Scene Management was a joke. if the same thing was to happen today, they'd have had their arses handed to them in a Tesco bag and he'd have walked. I'm pretty convince of that.
    • Like Like x 4
  3. Justice would give him a retrial with all the available evidence released, as large amount is locked away under PII for reasons I cannot understand.
  4. No reflection of guilt or innocence...I just personally found him to be a creepy bloke and was very glad of the armed guard with him. He made my hair stand on end.
  5. How many times does he appeal? Until he gets the answer he wants?

    Essex plod f#cked up beyond doubt, because they actually believed him.

    He's convinced himself of his own innocence now and nothing will persuade him otherwise, not even a seance with his dead relatives
    • Like Like x 1
  6. He's done 25 years inside , whether he did it or not.
    Tha's a long sentence whichever way you look at it.
    I say let him go on the off chance he IS innnocent , but don't re- settle him
    anywhere near me in case he isn't , as he has probably got some serious anger management issues .
  7. 1. I would imagine that's the general idea, unless you think that he's doing it for fun?

    2. They did, but not for the reason which you believe.

    3. Do you really, really, really think that would hold water in the Appeals process?
    • Like Like x 1
  8. He didn't seem that creepy on University Challenge.
    • Like Like x 13
  9. I know, but there's a limit. It's like screaming for an ice cream and no you can't have one.

    Really? You've read the police reports then? Or are you just repeating what he says?

    He's offered if not taken a lie detector. Doesn't mean he didn't do it. I'm saying that he has convinced himself of his own innocence. Not sure why you think I would raise that in any appeal process.
  10. Isn't there some controversy over how the rifle suppressor was found?

    Saw something on telly about this case a while ago and there does seem to be something a bit iffy from the police/authorities area.
  11. He spoke highly of you. He said that you'd get it. Peter Sutcliffe has the hots for you as well.
  12. A friend of mine is an officer at his prison and has know Bamber for a fair while. His verdict is that he is an evil scheming bastard who is in exactly the right place.

  13. 1. He's been screaming for that ice cream a long time then.

    2. As a matter of fact I've read substantially on the matter.

    3. Of course he has. Ever thought that he might just be innocent. As for the seance...hey, you started it.
  14. I know, doesn't mean he should get one

    So you've read (guesstimate) thirty or so storage boxes of police reports then?

    Me? Based on discussions I've had, no. But then I could be wrong.

    There's plenty who believe him, particularly the closer you get to the village. IMO there just needs to be a limit where he's told there's no new evidence. Yes Essex plod f#cked up but you are guilty beyond reasonable doubt and have been proved as such repeatedly.