I'm not going to answer or entertain any more circular debates on the above cos' I can't be fukin arsed arguing with thickos who lack critical thinking skills. Particularly when it comes to "applying" those limited cognitive abilities to heart-eaters who will very shortly be on our shores and influencing other would-be jihadists with their tales of derring-do.
Anyway, it’s funny how the Russophiles and ‘useful idiots’ paint a ‘picture’ of people exposing RuAF and SAAF war crimes. Them hopping from one organisation to another has also been explained. I can’t say I’m happy with their canonisation any more than I am with their demonisation.
As for ‘flimsy evidence’, they’re helped by Israel so they must be Israeli tools? Imagine if such ‘evidence’ was used to say the same thing about IS and Assad’s govt? After all, somebody was buying their oil.
Critical thinking is a two way street. If you blindly accept what the agitprop says about anything then your thinking isn’t critical. It’s blinkered.