Island Covenant aka Rules

#1
Do we need a few?

I'd like to start off with - if someone isnt playing your game of war and is trying to do some building or chatting to another user, dont sit on the top of hills and continually blow them out to sea.

Whilst SL is good fun, its bloody easy to ruin it for others.

Hurumph.
 
#2
boney_m said:
Do we need a few?

I'd like to start off with - if someone isnt playing your game of war and is trying to do some building or chatting to another user, dont sit on the top of hills and continually blow them out to sea.

Whilst SL is good fun, its bloody easy to ruin it for others.

Hurumph.
Speaking from experience there boney!

I aggree though, maybe those ivolved in waging war on each other should wear DPM :numberone:
 

Fugly

LE
DirtyBAT
#4
boney_m said:
Do we need a few?

I'd like to start off with - if someone isnt playing your game of war and is trying to do some building or chatting to another user, dont sit on the top of hills and continually blow them out to sea.

Whilst SL is good fun, its bloody easy to ruin it for others.

Hurumph.
Boney - I think I am (indirectly) responsible for your annoyance.

Mrs Fugly wanted to see what all the fuss was about, and logged into SL as me. She took a few people out with the Melon Launcher, and one of them was blatently you, and you were otherwise involved in other stuff.

So, Sorry!!!!

I agree, ROE need to be established.

Can we get a SL card Alpha produced?

- No engagement of members involved in chat/building activities

- No engagement of members not sporting an equipped weapon

etc.

Chubbs are outside of the ROE, and can be engaged at will.
 
#5
I think it definately boils down to not engaging anyone without a gat of some description. (apart from trolls and the odd sneak attack where you know the receiver will apreciate it).
 
#6
There seems to be some confusion over the 'regulations' for the Island.

The covenant for the Island can be found if you right click on the land, select about land and click the covenant tab.

Regulations for use of land on RnR Island (for rent or sale)

No pornographic or obscene buildings, objects, text or images, or linking via hyperlink or second life links to web sites / SL places offering such content. The NAAFI Bar regulations from ARRSE are a good guideline, but if in doubt, ask.

No casinos or gambling except fruit machines

No business use without permission from ARRSE / Rum Ration / Rear Party Admin ( admin@arrse.co.uk ). This will not normally be a problem.

No signs larger than 5m x 5m x 1m and not more than 10m in height from the surrounding land or substantial building.

When renting land, land use rules and rental price are subject to change.
 
#8
sniper_bob said:
I'm confused - are these rules or just guidelines? (specifically referring to para 2!)
Oh look Bob, dont make me come and kick your arse, again.

They are Regulations - Para 2 is a regulation - regarding things outside those specific regulations, NAAFI rules and etiquette which you will find on the forum are a good guideline..
 
#9
Thank you ma'am.

So let's get this right. The Regulations are there because a. we're all naughty boys who need regulating? b. SHEF (if we're not regulated we could self-harm)? c. it's a PR thing to make us look respectable because anything else doesn't look good in the papers and upsets civilians at their breakfast?

I'm bending over in anticipation.
 
#10
I admit they're over the top. I had it in my mind that as soon as we rented land the island would be overshowed by a 100m tall round pink building with a helmet-like bit on the end or some of the other porn junk you see around SL. That should be the choice of you lot of course so when I finally get 5 minutes to look at the island again I'll get rid of it - the covenant, not the cock.
 
#11
Shooting someone in the face for wearing pink speedos should be acceptable.


As should any attack on Ed Foden, at any time, for any reason, just shoot the little turd on sight.
 
#12
Bullet Sponge said:
Shooting someone in the face for wearing pink speedos should be acceptable.


As should any attack on Ed Foden, at any time, for any reason, just shoot the little turd on sight.
Make that man a General ! Well said Sponge.
 
#13
if only i had known he was a nuisance I have many weapons as yet untested
mwaaaaah mwaaaahaa *cough*
 
#14
Bullet Sponge said:
Shooting someone in the face for wearing pink speedos should be acceptable.
Well its not acceptable and its not big and its not funny. Will we be having dress regulations as well now? Why don't we all get into DPMs while we're at it? Pink speedos are easily recognisable in a fight and avoid those nasty friendly fire incidents. Have you ever seen Ed Foden in pink speedos? No, thought not. I rest my case.

Agree with the rest of your statement though.
 
#15
sniper_bob said:
Bullet Sponge said:
Shooting someone in the face for wearing pink speedos should be acceptable.
Well its not acceptable and its not big and its not funny. Will we be having dress regulations as well now? Why don't we all get into DPMs while we're at it? Pink speedos are easily recognisable in a fight and avoid those nasty friendly fire incidents. Have you ever seen Ed Foden in pink speedos? No, thought not. I rest my case.

Agree with the rest of your statement though.
The lime green ones were a bit better than the pink ones......not a lot in it though....
 
#16
sniper_bob said:
Bullet Sponge said:
Shooting someone in the face for wearing pink speedos should be acceptable.
Well its not acceptable and its not big and its not funny. Will we be having dress regulations as well now? Why don't we all get into DPMs while we're at it? Pink speedos are easily recognisable in a fight and avoid those nasty friendly fire incidents. Have you ever seen Ed Foden in pink speedos? No, thought not. I rest my case.

Agree with the rest of your statement though.
Alright alright, keep your knickers (pink speedos) on love :winkrazz:
 
#17
I have an idea, why doesn't someone make a group saying " ARRSE do not shoot" then the people during the shoot up do not shoot at them. Just a stupid idea by me.
 
#18
Romeo_47 said:
I have an idea, why doesn't someone make a group saying " ARRSE do not shoot" then the people during the shoot up do not shoot at them. Just a stupid idea by me.
Yep you're right Romeo! But it might just work, but will we have to do judgemental shooting training though, so we can immediately recognise the do not shoot, or maybe the non-combatants could wear a french uniform and carry a white flag - just an idea mind ! :plotting:
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top