Can't believe that one of our eagle-eyed monket fanciers has not spotted this by this time on a Sunday If - please Mr Mod note I said IF - there is anything in this story, the sybills seem to have covered all bases. A dodgy basis for the enquiry, poor execution of what was supposed to happen and a outright failure to cover-up an abortion of a case. All calculated, it would seem, to draw maximum attention to what they did. On something that should be a simple bread and butter case for a team that is supposed to be top notch on the question of drugs. Mind you, old scallywags like me would have been against it right from the start - how can you have a SIB officer with a name like Andre? Everyone makes mistakes and should be given allowances but this Branch seem to be getting into the habit. What would IPCC have recommended if the proposed supervision had been in place? Irrelevent I suspect given the somewhat inconclusive reports we are getting back about the Brazilian incident where they don't seem to know what they will recommend to CPS.